Ecological potential for rabies virus transmission via scavenging of dead bats by mesocarnivores

Tad Theimer, Annie C. Dyer, Brian W. Keeley, Amy T. Gilbert, David L. Bergman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple species of bats are reservoirs of rabies virus in the Americas and are occasionally the source of spillover infections into mesocarnivore species. Although rabies transmission generally is assumed to occur via bite, laboratory studies have demonstrated the potential for rabies transmission via ingestion of rabid animals. We investigated the ecological potential for this mode of transmission by assessing mesocarnivore scavenging behavior of dead bats in suburban habitats of Flagstaff, Arizona, US. In autumn 2013, summer 2014, and autumn 2015, we placed 104 rabies-negative bat carcasses either near buildings, in wildland areas, or in residential yards and then monitored them with trail cameras for 5 d. Overall, 52 (50%) bat carcasses were scavenged, with 39 (75%) of those scavenged by striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Within our study area, striped skunks had a higher ecological potential to contract rabies via ingestion of bat carcasses compared to other mesocarnivore species, due both to a greater number of encounters and a higher probability of ingestion per encounter (91%), and they were significantly more likely to approach bat carcasses in yards than in wildland areas. Raccoons (Procyon lotor) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) had fewer encounters (nine and 13, respectively) and lower probability of ingesting bats (33% and 8%, respectively).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)382-385
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Wildlife Diseases
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

rabies
Rabies virus
virus transmission
bat
Chiroptera
virus
Urocyon cinereoargenteus
skunks
Procyon lotor
ingestion
scavenging behavior
autumn
Mephitis mephitis
cameras
animal
summer
habitat
habitats

Keywords

  • Bat
  • Mephitis mephitis
  • Procyon lotor
  • Rabies
  • Scavenging
  • Skunk
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Ecological potential for rabies virus transmission via scavenging of dead bats by mesocarnivores. / Theimer, Tad; Dyer, Annie C.; Keeley, Brian W.; Gilbert, Amy T.; Bergman, David L.

In: Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 382-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Theimer, Tad ; Dyer, Annie C. ; Keeley, Brian W. ; Gilbert, Amy T. ; Bergman, David L. / Ecological potential for rabies virus transmission via scavenging of dead bats by mesocarnivores. In: Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2017 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 382-385.
@article{e38ed82a494541bfb867f924aa2dbc64,
title = "Ecological potential for rabies virus transmission via scavenging of dead bats by mesocarnivores",
abstract = "Multiple species of bats are reservoirs of rabies virus in the Americas and are occasionally the source of spillover infections into mesocarnivore species. Although rabies transmission generally is assumed to occur via bite, laboratory studies have demonstrated the potential for rabies transmission via ingestion of rabid animals. We investigated the ecological potential for this mode of transmission by assessing mesocarnivore scavenging behavior of dead bats in suburban habitats of Flagstaff, Arizona, US. In autumn 2013, summer 2014, and autumn 2015, we placed 104 rabies-negative bat carcasses either near buildings, in wildland areas, or in residential yards and then monitored them with trail cameras for 5 d. Overall, 52 (50{\%}) bat carcasses were scavenged, with 39 (75{\%}) of those scavenged by striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Within our study area, striped skunks had a higher ecological potential to contract rabies via ingestion of bat carcasses compared to other mesocarnivore species, due both to a greater number of encounters and a higher probability of ingestion per encounter (91{\%}), and they were significantly more likely to approach bat carcasses in yards than in wildland areas. Raccoons (Procyon lotor) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) had fewer encounters (nine and 13, respectively) and lower probability of ingesting bats (33{\%} and 8{\%}, respectively).",
keywords = "Bat, Mephitis mephitis, Procyon lotor, Rabies, Scavenging, Skunk, Urocyon cinereoargenteus",
author = "Tad Theimer and Dyer, {Annie C.} and Keeley, {Brian W.} and Gilbert, {Amy T.} and Bergman, {David L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7589/2016-09-203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "382--385",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Diseases",
issn = "0090-3558",
publisher = "Wildlife Disease Association, Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecological potential for rabies virus transmission via scavenging of dead bats by mesocarnivores

AU - Theimer, Tad

AU - Dyer, Annie C.

AU - Keeley, Brian W.

AU - Gilbert, Amy T.

AU - Bergman, David L.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Multiple species of bats are reservoirs of rabies virus in the Americas and are occasionally the source of spillover infections into mesocarnivore species. Although rabies transmission generally is assumed to occur via bite, laboratory studies have demonstrated the potential for rabies transmission via ingestion of rabid animals. We investigated the ecological potential for this mode of transmission by assessing mesocarnivore scavenging behavior of dead bats in suburban habitats of Flagstaff, Arizona, US. In autumn 2013, summer 2014, and autumn 2015, we placed 104 rabies-negative bat carcasses either near buildings, in wildland areas, or in residential yards and then monitored them with trail cameras for 5 d. Overall, 52 (50%) bat carcasses were scavenged, with 39 (75%) of those scavenged by striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Within our study area, striped skunks had a higher ecological potential to contract rabies via ingestion of bat carcasses compared to other mesocarnivore species, due both to a greater number of encounters and a higher probability of ingestion per encounter (91%), and they were significantly more likely to approach bat carcasses in yards than in wildland areas. Raccoons (Procyon lotor) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) had fewer encounters (nine and 13, respectively) and lower probability of ingesting bats (33% and 8%, respectively).

AB - Multiple species of bats are reservoirs of rabies virus in the Americas and are occasionally the source of spillover infections into mesocarnivore species. Although rabies transmission generally is assumed to occur via bite, laboratory studies have demonstrated the potential for rabies transmission via ingestion of rabid animals. We investigated the ecological potential for this mode of transmission by assessing mesocarnivore scavenging behavior of dead bats in suburban habitats of Flagstaff, Arizona, US. In autumn 2013, summer 2014, and autumn 2015, we placed 104 rabies-negative bat carcasses either near buildings, in wildland areas, or in residential yards and then monitored them with trail cameras for 5 d. Overall, 52 (50%) bat carcasses were scavenged, with 39 (75%) of those scavenged by striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Within our study area, striped skunks had a higher ecological potential to contract rabies via ingestion of bat carcasses compared to other mesocarnivore species, due both to a greater number of encounters and a higher probability of ingestion per encounter (91%), and they were significantly more likely to approach bat carcasses in yards than in wildland areas. Raccoons (Procyon lotor) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) had fewer encounters (nine and 13, respectively) and lower probability of ingesting bats (33% and 8%, respectively).

KW - Bat

KW - Mephitis mephitis

KW - Procyon lotor

KW - Rabies

KW - Scavenging

KW - Skunk

KW - Urocyon cinereoargenteus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017236314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017236314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7589/2016-09-203

DO - 10.7589/2016-09-203

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 382

EP - 385

JO - Journal of Wildlife Diseases

JF - Journal of Wildlife Diseases

SN - 0090-3558

IS - 2

ER -