Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems

Natasha MacBean, Russell L. Scott, Joel A. Biederman, Philippe Peylin, Thomas Kolb, Marcy E. Litvak, Praveena Krishnan, Tilden P. Meyers, Vivek K. Arora, Vladislav Bastrikov, Daniel Goll, Danica L. Lombardozzi, Julia E.M.S. Nabel, Julia Pongratz, Stephen Sitch, Anthony P. Walker, Sönke Zaehle, David J.P. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite their sparse vegetation, dryland regions exert a huge influence over global biogeochemical cycles because they cover more than 40% of the world surface (Schimel 2010 Science 327 418–9). It is thought that drylands dominate the inter-annual variability (IAV) and long-term trend in the global carbon (C) cycle (Poulter et al 2014 Nature 509 600–3, Ahlstrom et al 2015 Science 348 895–9, Zhang et al 2018 Glob. Change Biol. 24 3954–68). Projections of the global land C sink therefore rely on accurate representation of dryland C cycle processes; however, the dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) used in future projections have rarely been evaluated against dryland C flux data. Here, we carried out an evaluation of 14 DGVMs (TRENDY v7) against net ecosystem exchange (NEE) data from 12 dryland flux sites in the southwestern US encompassing a range of ecosystem types (forests, shrub- and grasslands). We find that all the models underestimate both mean annual C uptake/release as well as the magnitude of NEE IAV, suggesting that improvements in representing dryland regions may improve global C cycle projections. Across all models, the sensitivity and timing of ecosystem C uptake to plant available moisture was at fault. Spring biases in gross primary production (GPP) dominate the underestimate of mean annual NEE, whereas models’ lack of GPP response to water availability in both spring and summer monsoon are responsible for inability to capture NEE IAV. Errors in GPP moisture sensitivity at high elevation forested sites were more prominent during the spring, while errors at the low elevation shrub and grass-dominated sites were more important during the monsoon. We propose a range of hypotheses for why model GPP does not respond sufficiently to changing water availability that can serve as a guide for future dryland DGVM developments. Our analysis suggests that improvements in modeling C cycle processes across more than a quarter of the Earth’s land surface could be achieved by addressing the moisture sensitivity of dryland C uptake.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number094023
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume16
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

Keywords

  • Drylands
  • Dynamic global vegetation models
  • Global carbon cycle
  • Inter-annual variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO<sub>2</sub> flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this