Dueling tragedies

A critical read of the Lautenberg story

Phoebe A Morgan, Madelaine Adelman, J. Stephen Soli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Every law tells a story and some of the stories we tell become the law. Conceptualizing law as literature and taking a social science approach, we examine the dynamics of a storytelling contest between the National Network to End Domestic Violence and a coalition of law enforcement professional organizations regarding the most stringent federal gun control legislation in the United States - the 1997 Lautenberg Amendment. Relying upon qualitative content analysis, we discovered that contestants drew upon the same elements of classic tragedy to compose different stories. Our analysis compares the resources and experiences available to each coalition and examines how differences between them affected the stories told. We discuss the role that dueling tragedies play in public policy controversies and evaluate the implications our case study has for understanding the competition for legislation, storytelling research and the conceptualization of law as literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)424-451
Number of pages28
JournalLaw, Culture and the Humanities
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Law
coalition
legislation
professional association
law enforcement
domestic violence
amendment
content analysis
public policy
social science
Tragedy
resources
experience
literature
Legislation
Storytelling
Law Enforcement
Resources
Domestic Violence
Conceptualization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Cultural Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Dueling tragedies : A critical read of the Lautenberg story. / Morgan, Phoebe A; Adelman, Madelaine; Soli, J. Stephen.

In: Law, Culture and the Humanities, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2008, p. 424-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morgan, Phoebe A ; Adelman, Madelaine ; Soli, J. Stephen. / Dueling tragedies : A critical read of the Lautenberg story. In: Law, Culture and the Humanities. 2008 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 424-451.
@article{760111a62eff4b98b9dc2835a1de9e86,
title = "Dueling tragedies: A critical read of the Lautenberg story",
abstract = "Every law tells a story and some of the stories we tell become the law. Conceptualizing law as literature and taking a social science approach, we examine the dynamics of a storytelling contest between the National Network to End Domestic Violence and a coalition of law enforcement professional organizations regarding the most stringent federal gun control legislation in the United States - the 1997 Lautenberg Amendment. Relying upon qualitative content analysis, we discovered that contestants drew upon the same elements of classic tragedy to compose different stories. Our analysis compares the resources and experiences available to each coalition and examines how differences between them affected the stories told. We discuss the role that dueling tragedies play in public policy controversies and evaluate the implications our case study has for understanding the competition for legislation, storytelling research and the conceptualization of law as literature.",
author = "Morgan, {Phoebe A} and Madelaine Adelman and Soli, {J. Stephen}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1177/1743872108093106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "424--451",
journal = "Law, Culture and the Humanities",
issn = "1743-8721",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dueling tragedies

T2 - A critical read of the Lautenberg story

AU - Morgan, Phoebe A

AU - Adelman, Madelaine

AU - Soli, J. Stephen

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Every law tells a story and some of the stories we tell become the law. Conceptualizing law as literature and taking a social science approach, we examine the dynamics of a storytelling contest between the National Network to End Domestic Violence and a coalition of law enforcement professional organizations regarding the most stringent federal gun control legislation in the United States - the 1997 Lautenberg Amendment. Relying upon qualitative content analysis, we discovered that contestants drew upon the same elements of classic tragedy to compose different stories. Our analysis compares the resources and experiences available to each coalition and examines how differences between them affected the stories told. We discuss the role that dueling tragedies play in public policy controversies and evaluate the implications our case study has for understanding the competition for legislation, storytelling research and the conceptualization of law as literature.

AB - Every law tells a story and some of the stories we tell become the law. Conceptualizing law as literature and taking a social science approach, we examine the dynamics of a storytelling contest between the National Network to End Domestic Violence and a coalition of law enforcement professional organizations regarding the most stringent federal gun control legislation in the United States - the 1997 Lautenberg Amendment. Relying upon qualitative content analysis, we discovered that contestants drew upon the same elements of classic tragedy to compose different stories. Our analysis compares the resources and experiences available to each coalition and examines how differences between them affected the stories told. We discuss the role that dueling tragedies play in public policy controversies and evaluate the implications our case study has for understanding the competition for legislation, storytelling research and the conceptualization of law as literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50849122663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50849122663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1743872108093106

DO - 10.1177/1743872108093106

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 424

EP - 451

JO - Law, Culture and the Humanities

JF - Law, Culture and the Humanities

SN - 1743-8721

IS - 3

ER -