Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements?

Thomas G. McPoil, Drew Carrell, Derrik Ehlers, Holly Kuhlman, Judy Mufti, Mary Pomeroy, Olivia Taylor, Mark W Cornwall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have reported conflicting results on whether different foot placements in standing can affect static measurements of foot posture. We sought to determine whether three measurements of static foot posture could be consistently measured in three different foot placements while standing. Methods: Twenty individuals, 12 women and eight men, with a mean age of 24.8 years consented to participate. Two raters assessed the dorsal arch height, midfoot width, and heel width of each foot while the participant stood in the following three foot placements: a standardized placement, a participant-determined placement after marching in place, and a rater-determined foot placement based on observation of the participant's angle of gait and base of support while walking. Results: All three measurements of static foot posture were shown to have high levels of intrarater and interrater reliability. Significant differences in the measurements of dorsal arch height, midfoot width, and heel width were found among all three of the foot placements. There were no differences between the two raters for any of the three measurements of foot posture. Conclusions: Based on these findings, we recommend that clinicians perform measurements of static foot posture using the same standing foot placement between sessions to ensure a high level of measurement consistency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-42
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume104
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Posture
Foot
Heel
Gait
Walking
Observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Podiatry

Cite this

McPoil, T. G., Carrell, D., Ehlers, D., Kuhlman, H., Mufti, J., Pomeroy, M., ... Cornwall, M. W. (2014). Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements? Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 104(1), 34-42.

Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements? / McPoil, Thomas G.; Carrell, Drew; Ehlers, Derrik; Kuhlman, Holly; Mufti, Judy; Pomeroy, Mary; Taylor, Olivia; Cornwall, Mark W.

In: Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol. 104, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 34-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McPoil, TG, Carrell, D, Ehlers, D, Kuhlman, H, Mufti, J, Pomeroy, M, Taylor, O & Cornwall, MW 2014, 'Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements?', Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 34-42.
McPoil TG, Carrell D, Ehlers D, Kuhlman H, Mufti J, Pomeroy M et al. Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements? Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2014 Jan;104(1):34-42.
McPoil, Thomas G. ; Carrell, Drew ; Ehlers, Derrik ; Kuhlman, Holly ; Mufti, Judy ; Pomeroy, Mary ; Taylor, Olivia ; Cornwall, Mark W. / Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements?. In: Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2014 ; Vol. 104, No. 1. pp. 34-42.
@article{d7977be37b2d4f71832ff82c361c9bd4,
title = "Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements?",
abstract = "Background: Previous studies have reported conflicting results on whether different foot placements in standing can affect static measurements of foot posture. We sought to determine whether three measurements of static foot posture could be consistently measured in three different foot placements while standing. Methods: Twenty individuals, 12 women and eight men, with a mean age of 24.8 years consented to participate. Two raters assessed the dorsal arch height, midfoot width, and heel width of each foot while the participant stood in the following three foot placements: a standardized placement, a participant-determined placement after marching in place, and a rater-determined foot placement based on observation of the participant's angle of gait and base of support while walking. Results: All three measurements of static foot posture were shown to have high levels of intrarater and interrater reliability. Significant differences in the measurements of dorsal arch height, midfoot width, and heel width were found among all three of the foot placements. There were no differences between the two raters for any of the three measurements of foot posture. Conclusions: Based on these findings, we recommend that clinicians perform measurements of static foot posture using the same standing foot placement between sessions to ensure a high level of measurement consistency.",
author = "McPoil, {Thomas G.} and Drew Carrell and Derrik Ehlers and Holly Kuhlman and Judy Mufti and Mary Pomeroy and Olivia Taylor and Cornwall, {Mark W}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "34--42",
journal = "Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association",
issn = "8750-7315",
publisher = "American Podiatric Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements?

AU - McPoil, Thomas G.

AU - Carrell, Drew

AU - Ehlers, Derrik

AU - Kuhlman, Holly

AU - Mufti, Judy

AU - Pomeroy, Mary

AU - Taylor, Olivia

AU - Cornwall, Mark W

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Background: Previous studies have reported conflicting results on whether different foot placements in standing can affect static measurements of foot posture. We sought to determine whether three measurements of static foot posture could be consistently measured in three different foot placements while standing. Methods: Twenty individuals, 12 women and eight men, with a mean age of 24.8 years consented to participate. Two raters assessed the dorsal arch height, midfoot width, and heel width of each foot while the participant stood in the following three foot placements: a standardized placement, a participant-determined placement after marching in place, and a rater-determined foot placement based on observation of the participant's angle of gait and base of support while walking. Results: All three measurements of static foot posture were shown to have high levels of intrarater and interrater reliability. Significant differences in the measurements of dorsal arch height, midfoot width, and heel width were found among all three of the foot placements. There were no differences between the two raters for any of the three measurements of foot posture. Conclusions: Based on these findings, we recommend that clinicians perform measurements of static foot posture using the same standing foot placement between sessions to ensure a high level of measurement consistency.

AB - Background: Previous studies have reported conflicting results on whether different foot placements in standing can affect static measurements of foot posture. We sought to determine whether three measurements of static foot posture could be consistently measured in three different foot placements while standing. Methods: Twenty individuals, 12 women and eight men, with a mean age of 24.8 years consented to participate. Two raters assessed the dorsal arch height, midfoot width, and heel width of each foot while the participant stood in the following three foot placements: a standardized placement, a participant-determined placement after marching in place, and a rater-determined foot placement based on observation of the participant's angle of gait and base of support while walking. Results: All three measurements of static foot posture were shown to have high levels of intrarater and interrater reliability. Significant differences in the measurements of dorsal arch height, midfoot width, and heel width were found among all three of the foot placements. There were no differences between the two raters for any of the three measurements of foot posture. Conclusions: Based on these findings, we recommend that clinicians perform measurements of static foot posture using the same standing foot placement between sessions to ensure a high level of measurement consistency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893575016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893575016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 34

EP - 42

JO - Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

JF - Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

SN - 8750-7315

IS - 1

ER -