Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior?

Peter Z Fule, Joseph E. Crouse, John Paul Roccaforte, Elizabeth L. Kalies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

117 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of forest thinning and burning treatments on restoring fire behavior attributes in western USA pine forests. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi), with co-occurring species, are adapted to a disturbance regime of frequent surface fires, but extended fire exclusion and other factors have led to historically uncharacteristically dense stands and high fuel loadings, supporting high-severity fires. Treatments to begin to reverse these changes and reduce fuel hazards have been tested experimentally and observations of wildfire behavior in treated stands have also been reported. Using a systematic review methodology, we found 54 studies with quantitative data suitable for meta-analysis. Combined treatments (thinning. +. burning) tended to have the greatest effect on reducing surface fuels and stand density, and raising modeled crowning and torching indices, as compared to burning or thinning alone. However, changes in canopy base height and canopy bulk density were not consistently related to treatment intensity, as measured by basal area reduction. There are a number of qualifications to the findings. First, because it is not feasible to subject treated areas to severe fire experimentally, inferences about potential fire behavior rely on imperfect modeling techniques. Second, research has not been carried uniformly over the ranges of the pine forests, although we found no significant differences in treatment effects between regions or forest types. Overall, however, meta-analysis of the literature to date strongly indicates that thinning and/or burning treatments do have effects consistent with the restoration of low-severity fire behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-81
Number of pages14
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume269
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

Pinus jeffreyi
fire behavior
Pinus ponderosa
thinning (plants)
coniferous forests
thinning
meta-analysis
fuels (fire ecology)
systematic review
fuel loading
canopy
forest thinning
fire severity
stand density
wildfires
forest types
wildfire
basal area
bulk density
hazard

Keywords

  • Fuel
  • Meta-analysis
  • Pinus jeffreyi
  • Pinus ponderosa
  • Wildfire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior? / Fule, Peter Z; Crouse, Joseph E.; Roccaforte, John Paul; Kalies, Elizabeth L.

In: Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 269, 01.04.2012, p. 68-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{674784ac21674471a268db99a875bbce,
title = "Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior?",
abstract = "We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of forest thinning and burning treatments on restoring fire behavior attributes in western USA pine forests. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi), with co-occurring species, are adapted to a disturbance regime of frequent surface fires, but extended fire exclusion and other factors have led to historically uncharacteristically dense stands and high fuel loadings, supporting high-severity fires. Treatments to begin to reverse these changes and reduce fuel hazards have been tested experimentally and observations of wildfire behavior in treated stands have also been reported. Using a systematic review methodology, we found 54 studies with quantitative data suitable for meta-analysis. Combined treatments (thinning. +. burning) tended to have the greatest effect on reducing surface fuels and stand density, and raising modeled crowning and torching indices, as compared to burning or thinning alone. However, changes in canopy base height and canopy bulk density were not consistently related to treatment intensity, as measured by basal area reduction. There are a number of qualifications to the findings. First, because it is not feasible to subject treated areas to severe fire experimentally, inferences about potential fire behavior rely on imperfect modeling techniques. Second, research has not been carried uniformly over the ranges of the pine forests, although we found no significant differences in treatment effects between regions or forest types. Overall, however, meta-analysis of the literature to date strongly indicates that thinning and/or burning treatments do have effects consistent with the restoration of low-severity fire behavior.",
keywords = "Fuel, Meta-analysis, Pinus jeffreyi, Pinus ponderosa, Wildfire",
author = "Fule, {Peter Z} and Crouse, {Joseph E.} and Roccaforte, {John Paul} and Kalies, {Elizabeth L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "269",
pages = "68--81",
journal = "Forest Ecology and Management",
issn = "0378-1127",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior?

AU - Fule, Peter Z

AU - Crouse, Joseph E.

AU - Roccaforte, John Paul

AU - Kalies, Elizabeth L.

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of forest thinning and burning treatments on restoring fire behavior attributes in western USA pine forests. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi), with co-occurring species, are adapted to a disturbance regime of frequent surface fires, but extended fire exclusion and other factors have led to historically uncharacteristically dense stands and high fuel loadings, supporting high-severity fires. Treatments to begin to reverse these changes and reduce fuel hazards have been tested experimentally and observations of wildfire behavior in treated stands have also been reported. Using a systematic review methodology, we found 54 studies with quantitative data suitable for meta-analysis. Combined treatments (thinning. +. burning) tended to have the greatest effect on reducing surface fuels and stand density, and raising modeled crowning and torching indices, as compared to burning or thinning alone. However, changes in canopy base height and canopy bulk density were not consistently related to treatment intensity, as measured by basal area reduction. There are a number of qualifications to the findings. First, because it is not feasible to subject treated areas to severe fire experimentally, inferences about potential fire behavior rely on imperfect modeling techniques. Second, research has not been carried uniformly over the ranges of the pine forests, although we found no significant differences in treatment effects between regions or forest types. Overall, however, meta-analysis of the literature to date strongly indicates that thinning and/or burning treatments do have effects consistent with the restoration of low-severity fire behavior.

AB - We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of forest thinning and burning treatments on restoring fire behavior attributes in western USA pine forests. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi), with co-occurring species, are adapted to a disturbance regime of frequent surface fires, but extended fire exclusion and other factors have led to historically uncharacteristically dense stands and high fuel loadings, supporting high-severity fires. Treatments to begin to reverse these changes and reduce fuel hazards have been tested experimentally and observations of wildfire behavior in treated stands have also been reported. Using a systematic review methodology, we found 54 studies with quantitative data suitable for meta-analysis. Combined treatments (thinning. +. burning) tended to have the greatest effect on reducing surface fuels and stand density, and raising modeled crowning and torching indices, as compared to burning or thinning alone. However, changes in canopy base height and canopy bulk density were not consistently related to treatment intensity, as measured by basal area reduction. There are a number of qualifications to the findings. First, because it is not feasible to subject treated areas to severe fire experimentally, inferences about potential fire behavior rely on imperfect modeling techniques. Second, research has not been carried uniformly over the ranges of the pine forests, although we found no significant differences in treatment effects between regions or forest types. Overall, however, meta-analysis of the literature to date strongly indicates that thinning and/or burning treatments do have effects consistent with the restoration of low-severity fire behavior.

KW - Fuel

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Pinus jeffreyi

KW - Pinus ponderosa

KW - Wildfire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856448904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856448904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.025

DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.025

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84856448904

VL - 269

SP - 68

EP - 81

JO - Forest Ecology and Management

JF - Forest Ecology and Management

SN - 0378-1127

ER -