Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching?

Kiisa C Nishikawa, Sara T. Murray, Martha Flanders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For reaching movements in one plane, the hand has been observed to follow a similar path regardless of speed. Recent work on the control of more complex reaching movements raises the question of whether a similar 'speed invariance' also holds for the additional degrees of freedom. Therefore we examined human arm movements involving initial and final hand locations distributed throughout the three-dimensional (3D) workspace of the arm. Despite this added complexity, arm kinematics (summarized by the spatial orientation of the 'plane of the arm' and the 3D curvature of the hand path) changed very little for movements performed over a wide range of speeds. If the total force (dynamic + quasistatic) had been optimized by the control system (e.g., as in a minimization of the change in joint torques or the change in muscular forces), the optimal solution would change with speed; slow movements would reflect the minimal antigravity torques, whereas fast movements would be more strongly influenced by dynamic factors. The speed- invariant postures observed in this study are instead consistent with a hypothesized optimization of only the dynamic forces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2582-2586
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume81
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Posture
Arm
Hand
Torque
Biomechanical Phenomena
Joints

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Nishikawa, K. C., Murray, S. T., & Flanders, M. (1999). Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching? Journal of Neurophysiology, 81(5), 2582-2586.

Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching? / Nishikawa, Kiisa C; Murray, Sara T.; Flanders, Martha.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 81, No. 5, 1999, p. 2582-2586.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nishikawa, KC, Murray, ST & Flanders, M 1999, 'Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching?', Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 2582-2586.
Nishikawa, Kiisa C ; Murray, Sara T. ; Flanders, Martha. / Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching?. In: Journal of Neurophysiology. 1999 ; Vol. 81, No. 5. pp. 2582-2586.
@article{ebaa7af21bc143738bed911b423c0148,
title = "Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching?",
abstract = "For reaching movements in one plane, the hand has been observed to follow a similar path regardless of speed. Recent work on the control of more complex reaching movements raises the question of whether a similar 'speed invariance' also holds for the additional degrees of freedom. Therefore we examined human arm movements involving initial and final hand locations distributed throughout the three-dimensional (3D) workspace of the arm. Despite this added complexity, arm kinematics (summarized by the spatial orientation of the 'plane of the arm' and the 3D curvature of the hand path) changed very little for movements performed over a wide range of speeds. If the total force (dynamic + quasistatic) had been optimized by the control system (e.g., as in a minimization of the change in joint torques or the change in muscular forces), the optimal solution would change with speed; slow movements would reflect the minimal antigravity torques, whereas fast movements would be more strongly influenced by dynamic factors. The speed- invariant postures observed in this study are instead consistent with a hypothesized optimization of only the dynamic forces.",
author = "Nishikawa, {Kiisa C} and Murray, {Sara T.} and Martha Flanders",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "2582--2586",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching?

AU - Nishikawa, Kiisa C

AU - Murray, Sara T.

AU - Flanders, Martha

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - For reaching movements in one plane, the hand has been observed to follow a similar path regardless of speed. Recent work on the control of more complex reaching movements raises the question of whether a similar 'speed invariance' also holds for the additional degrees of freedom. Therefore we examined human arm movements involving initial and final hand locations distributed throughout the three-dimensional (3D) workspace of the arm. Despite this added complexity, arm kinematics (summarized by the spatial orientation of the 'plane of the arm' and the 3D curvature of the hand path) changed very little for movements performed over a wide range of speeds. If the total force (dynamic + quasistatic) had been optimized by the control system (e.g., as in a minimization of the change in joint torques or the change in muscular forces), the optimal solution would change with speed; slow movements would reflect the minimal antigravity torques, whereas fast movements would be more strongly influenced by dynamic factors. The speed- invariant postures observed in this study are instead consistent with a hypothesized optimization of only the dynamic forces.

AB - For reaching movements in one plane, the hand has been observed to follow a similar path regardless of speed. Recent work on the control of more complex reaching movements raises the question of whether a similar 'speed invariance' also holds for the additional degrees of freedom. Therefore we examined human arm movements involving initial and final hand locations distributed throughout the three-dimensional (3D) workspace of the arm. Despite this added complexity, arm kinematics (summarized by the spatial orientation of the 'plane of the arm' and the 3D curvature of the hand path) changed very little for movements performed over a wide range of speeds. If the total force (dynamic + quasistatic) had been optimized by the control system (e.g., as in a minimization of the change in joint torques or the change in muscular forces), the optimal solution would change with speed; slow movements would reflect the minimal antigravity torques, whereas fast movements would be more strongly influenced by dynamic factors. The speed- invariant postures observed in this study are instead consistent with a hypothesized optimization of only the dynamic forces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033054297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033054297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 2582

EP - 2586

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 5

ER -