DISTRIBUTIONAL TESTING OF DATA FROM MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

Fredric Jacobs, Kenneth S Lorek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A common characteristic of classical variance investigation models includes the assumptions that the in‐control cost observations from manufacturing processes are independently and normally distributed. The purpose of this paper is to empirically assess the appropriateness of the above assumptions in an accounting setting. Several sets of data generated from manufacturing processes were examined, with the following results. First, normality and independence assumptions appeared to be violated with the daily data. In addition, several transformations commonly employed in the statistics literature did not alter this conclusion. Second, the above assumptions were not violated with the weekly data. It was then demonstrated that these findings will, in general, hold. These results, subject to the inherent limitations of a case study approach, led to the following inferences and recommendations. Using classical statistical techniques and daily data to control a process incurs costs that have been previously overlooked, costs resulting from distributional assumption violations. If these costs exceed the benefits of using daily data, a manager should (1) use classical techniques to monitor weekly data, (2) use Tchebycheff inequalities to monitor daily data, and/or (3) use variance investigation models that more formally incorporate the serial dependencies of daily data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-271
Number of pages13
JournalDecision Sciences
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1980
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Testing
Costs
Managers
Statistics
Manufacturing process
Inference
Serials
Normality
Violations
Appropriateness

Keywords

  • Budgeting
  • Control Systems
  • Managerial Accounting
  • Planning and Control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

DISTRIBUTIONAL TESTING OF DATA FROM MANUFACTURING PROCESSES. / Jacobs, Fredric; Lorek, Kenneth S.

In: Decision Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1980, p. 259-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d17e9d8e0baa47f5a1afc417794fd827,
title = "DISTRIBUTIONAL TESTING OF DATA FROM MANUFACTURING PROCESSES",
abstract = "A common characteristic of classical variance investigation models includes the assumptions that the in‐control cost observations from manufacturing processes are independently and normally distributed. The purpose of this paper is to empirically assess the appropriateness of the above assumptions in an accounting setting. Several sets of data generated from manufacturing processes were examined, with the following results. First, normality and independence assumptions appeared to be violated with the daily data. In addition, several transformations commonly employed in the statistics literature did not alter this conclusion. Second, the above assumptions were not violated with the weekly data. It was then demonstrated that these findings will, in general, hold. These results, subject to the inherent limitations of a case study approach, led to the following inferences and recommendations. Using classical statistical techniques and daily data to control a process incurs costs that have been previously overlooked, costs resulting from distributional assumption violations. If these costs exceed the benefits of using daily data, a manager should (1) use classical techniques to monitor weekly data, (2) use Tchebycheff inequalities to monitor daily data, and/or (3) use variance investigation models that more formally incorporate the serial dependencies of daily data.",
keywords = "Budgeting, Control Systems, Managerial Accounting, Planning and Control",
author = "Fredric Jacobs and Lorek, {Kenneth S}",
year = "1980",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-5915.1980.tb01137.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "259--271",
journal = "Decision Sciences",
issn = "0011-7315",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - DISTRIBUTIONAL TESTING OF DATA FROM MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

AU - Jacobs, Fredric

AU - Lorek, Kenneth S

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - A common characteristic of classical variance investigation models includes the assumptions that the in‐control cost observations from manufacturing processes are independently and normally distributed. The purpose of this paper is to empirically assess the appropriateness of the above assumptions in an accounting setting. Several sets of data generated from manufacturing processes were examined, with the following results. First, normality and independence assumptions appeared to be violated with the daily data. In addition, several transformations commonly employed in the statistics literature did not alter this conclusion. Second, the above assumptions were not violated with the weekly data. It was then demonstrated that these findings will, in general, hold. These results, subject to the inherent limitations of a case study approach, led to the following inferences and recommendations. Using classical statistical techniques and daily data to control a process incurs costs that have been previously overlooked, costs resulting from distributional assumption violations. If these costs exceed the benefits of using daily data, a manager should (1) use classical techniques to monitor weekly data, (2) use Tchebycheff inequalities to monitor daily data, and/or (3) use variance investigation models that more formally incorporate the serial dependencies of daily data.

AB - A common characteristic of classical variance investigation models includes the assumptions that the in‐control cost observations from manufacturing processes are independently and normally distributed. The purpose of this paper is to empirically assess the appropriateness of the above assumptions in an accounting setting. Several sets of data generated from manufacturing processes were examined, with the following results. First, normality and independence assumptions appeared to be violated with the daily data. In addition, several transformations commonly employed in the statistics literature did not alter this conclusion. Second, the above assumptions were not violated with the weekly data. It was then demonstrated that these findings will, in general, hold. These results, subject to the inherent limitations of a case study approach, led to the following inferences and recommendations. Using classical statistical techniques and daily data to control a process incurs costs that have been previously overlooked, costs resulting from distributional assumption violations. If these costs exceed the benefits of using daily data, a manager should (1) use classical techniques to monitor weekly data, (2) use Tchebycheff inequalities to monitor daily data, and/or (3) use variance investigation models that more formally incorporate the serial dependencies of daily data.

KW - Budgeting

KW - Control Systems

KW - Managerial Accounting

KW - Planning and Control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989455483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989455483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1980.tb01137.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1980.tb01137.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84989455483

VL - 11

SP - 259

EP - 271

JO - Decision Sciences

JF - Decision Sciences

SN - 0011-7315

IS - 2

ER -