Disparity in population structuring of Southwestern Willow Flycatchers based on geographic distance, movement patterns, and genetic analyses

Katie J. Stumpf, Tad Theimer, Mary Anne Mcleod, Thomas J. Koronkiewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Estimates of population connectivity often are based on demographic analysis of movements among subpopulations, but this approach may fail to detect rare migrants or overestimate the contribution of movements into populations when migrants fail to successfully reproduce. We compared movement data of endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatchers among isolated populations in Nevada and Arizona from 1997 to 2008 to genetic analyses of samples collected between 2004 and 2008 to determine the degree to which these two methods were concordant in their estimates of population structuring. Given that documented movements of 13 color-banded adults and 23 juveniles over 10 years indicated low rates of long-distance movements, we predicted that genetic analyses would show significant population structuring between a northern (Nevada) deme and a southern (Arizona) deme. We genotyped 93 adult individuals at seven microsatellite loci and used two Bayesian clustering programs, STRUCTURE and GENELAND, to predict population structure. Both clustering algorithms produced the same structuring pattern; a cluster containing birds breeding in Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuge, the northern-most Nevada site, and a cluster comprised of all other populations. These results highlight that estimates of subpopulation connectivity based on demographic analyses may differ from those based on genetics, suggesting either temporal changes in the pattern of movements, the importance of undetected movements, or differential contribution of migrants to the subpopulations they enter.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)577-585
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology
Volume321
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Salix
Songbirds
Population
subpopulation
demographic statistics
Cluster Analysis
connectivity
Demography
isolated population
Empidonax trailii extimus
conservation areas
population structure
Microsatellite Repeats
refuge
Birds
Breeding
microsatellite repeats
Color
loci
color

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics
  • Physiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Disparity in population structuring of Southwestern Willow Flycatchers based on geographic distance, movement patterns, and genetic analyses. / Stumpf, Katie J.; Theimer, Tad; Mcleod, Mary Anne; Koronkiewicz, Thomas J.

In: Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology, Vol. 321, No. 10, 01.12.2014, p. 577-585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a7686e9ea354e40ad371d65c4d7217a,
title = "Disparity in population structuring of Southwestern Willow Flycatchers based on geographic distance, movement patterns, and genetic analyses",
abstract = "Estimates of population connectivity often are based on demographic analysis of movements among subpopulations, but this approach may fail to detect rare migrants or overestimate the contribution of movements into populations when migrants fail to successfully reproduce. We compared movement data of endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatchers among isolated populations in Nevada and Arizona from 1997 to 2008 to genetic analyses of samples collected between 2004 and 2008 to determine the degree to which these two methods were concordant in their estimates of population structuring. Given that documented movements of 13 color-banded adults and 23 juveniles over 10 years indicated low rates of long-distance movements, we predicted that genetic analyses would show significant population structuring between a northern (Nevada) deme and a southern (Arizona) deme. We genotyped 93 adult individuals at seven microsatellite loci and used two Bayesian clustering programs, STRUCTURE and GENELAND, to predict population structure. Both clustering algorithms produced the same structuring pattern; a cluster containing birds breeding in Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuge, the northern-most Nevada site, and a cluster comprised of all other populations. These results highlight that estimates of subpopulation connectivity based on demographic analyses may differ from those based on genetics, suggesting either temporal changes in the pattern of movements, the importance of undetected movements, or differential contribution of migrants to the subpopulations they enter.",
author = "Stumpf, {Katie J.} and Tad Theimer and Mcleod, {Mary Anne} and Koronkiewicz, {Thomas J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jez.1886",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "321",
pages = "577--585",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology",
issn = "1932-5223",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disparity in population structuring of Southwestern Willow Flycatchers based on geographic distance, movement patterns, and genetic analyses

AU - Stumpf, Katie J.

AU - Theimer, Tad

AU - Mcleod, Mary Anne

AU - Koronkiewicz, Thomas J.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Estimates of population connectivity often are based on demographic analysis of movements among subpopulations, but this approach may fail to detect rare migrants or overestimate the contribution of movements into populations when migrants fail to successfully reproduce. We compared movement data of endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatchers among isolated populations in Nevada and Arizona from 1997 to 2008 to genetic analyses of samples collected between 2004 and 2008 to determine the degree to which these two methods were concordant in their estimates of population structuring. Given that documented movements of 13 color-banded adults and 23 juveniles over 10 years indicated low rates of long-distance movements, we predicted that genetic analyses would show significant population structuring between a northern (Nevada) deme and a southern (Arizona) deme. We genotyped 93 adult individuals at seven microsatellite loci and used two Bayesian clustering programs, STRUCTURE and GENELAND, to predict population structure. Both clustering algorithms produced the same structuring pattern; a cluster containing birds breeding in Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuge, the northern-most Nevada site, and a cluster comprised of all other populations. These results highlight that estimates of subpopulation connectivity based on demographic analyses may differ from those based on genetics, suggesting either temporal changes in the pattern of movements, the importance of undetected movements, or differential contribution of migrants to the subpopulations they enter.

AB - Estimates of population connectivity often are based on demographic analysis of movements among subpopulations, but this approach may fail to detect rare migrants or overestimate the contribution of movements into populations when migrants fail to successfully reproduce. We compared movement data of endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatchers among isolated populations in Nevada and Arizona from 1997 to 2008 to genetic analyses of samples collected between 2004 and 2008 to determine the degree to which these two methods were concordant in their estimates of population structuring. Given that documented movements of 13 color-banded adults and 23 juveniles over 10 years indicated low rates of long-distance movements, we predicted that genetic analyses would show significant population structuring between a northern (Nevada) deme and a southern (Arizona) deme. We genotyped 93 adult individuals at seven microsatellite loci and used two Bayesian clustering programs, STRUCTURE and GENELAND, to predict population structure. Both clustering algorithms produced the same structuring pattern; a cluster containing birds breeding in Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuge, the northern-most Nevada site, and a cluster comprised of all other populations. These results highlight that estimates of subpopulation connectivity based on demographic analyses may differ from those based on genetics, suggesting either temporal changes in the pattern of movements, the importance of undetected movements, or differential contribution of migrants to the subpopulations they enter.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84909592376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84909592376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jez.1886

DO - 10.1002/jez.1886

M3 - Article

C2 - 25370444

AN - SCOPUS:84909592376

VL - 321

SP - 577

EP - 585

JO - Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology

JF - Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology

SN - 1932-5223

IS - 10

ER -