Diagnostic classification of patients with low back pain

Report on a survey of physical therapy experts

J. Binkley, E. Finch, J. Hall, T. Black, C. Gowland, Carl P DeRosa, P. Beattie, S. H. Roy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose. A survey of expert orthopedic physical therapists was conducted to assist in the development of a classification system for patients with low back pain (LBP). The goal of the survey was to measure levels of agreement on labels and accompanying constellations of signs and symptoms for subgroups of patients with LBP. Subjects. Twenty-four of the 30 expert orthopedic physical therapists who were originally contacted responded to the survey request. Methods. A modified Delphi technique was used. The first stage involved a review of the literature and identification of 25 diagnostic classes of LBP. Experts were asked to rate the 'appropriateness' of each diagnostic class for inclusion in a classification scheme. Clinical findings relevant to each diagnostic class were identified and rated on the degree of 'essentialness' to that class. Results. Three diagnostic classes- hypomobility dysfunction, nerve root adhesion, and sacroiliac hypermobility- were distinct in that the agreement criteria for the appropriateness of diagnostic classes as well as the surveyed essential signs and symptoms were met. Six of the 25 diagnostic classes did not meet the minimum levels required for agreement as appropriate diagnostic classes: facet syndrome, chronic pain behavior, muscle strain, iliolumbar ligament sprain, posterior ligament sprain, and myofascial dysfunction. Conclusion and Discussion. The importance of developing homogeneous subgroups of patients with LBP based on constellations of reliable clinical findings is emphasized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-155
Number of pages18
JournalPhysical Therapy
Volume73
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Sprains and Strains
Physical Therapists
Ligaments
Signs and Symptoms
Orthopedics
Delphi Technique
Therapeutics
Chronic Pain
Muscles
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Delphi technique
  • Diagnosis
  • Low back pain
  • Lumbar spine
  • Syndromes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Binkley, J., Finch, E., Hall, J., Black, T., Gowland, C., DeRosa, C. P., ... Roy, S. H. (1993). Diagnostic classification of patients with low back pain: Report on a survey of physical therapy experts. Physical Therapy, 73(3), 138-155.

Diagnostic classification of patients with low back pain : Report on a survey of physical therapy experts. / Binkley, J.; Finch, E.; Hall, J.; Black, T.; Gowland, C.; DeRosa, Carl P; Beattie, P.; Roy, S. H.

In: Physical Therapy, Vol. 73, No. 3, 1993, p. 138-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Binkley, J, Finch, E, Hall, J, Black, T, Gowland, C, DeRosa, CP, Beattie, P & Roy, SH 1993, 'Diagnostic classification of patients with low back pain: Report on a survey of physical therapy experts', Physical Therapy, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 138-155.
Binkley, J. ; Finch, E. ; Hall, J. ; Black, T. ; Gowland, C. ; DeRosa, Carl P ; Beattie, P. ; Roy, S. H. / Diagnostic classification of patients with low back pain : Report on a survey of physical therapy experts. In: Physical Therapy. 1993 ; Vol. 73, No. 3. pp. 138-155.
@article{f44a0ea9deae4cbd8aaf32dda6125616,
title = "Diagnostic classification of patients with low back pain: Report on a survey of physical therapy experts",
abstract = "Background and Purpose. A survey of expert orthopedic physical therapists was conducted to assist in the development of a classification system for patients with low back pain (LBP). The goal of the survey was to measure levels of agreement on labels and accompanying constellations of signs and symptoms for subgroups of patients with LBP. Subjects. Twenty-four of the 30 expert orthopedic physical therapists who were originally contacted responded to the survey request. Methods. A modified Delphi technique was used. The first stage involved a review of the literature and identification of 25 diagnostic classes of LBP. Experts were asked to rate the 'appropriateness' of each diagnostic class for inclusion in a classification scheme. Clinical findings relevant to each diagnostic class were identified and rated on the degree of 'essentialness' to that class. Results. Three diagnostic classes- hypomobility dysfunction, nerve root adhesion, and sacroiliac hypermobility- were distinct in that the agreement criteria for the appropriateness of diagnostic classes as well as the surveyed essential signs and symptoms were met. Six of the 25 diagnostic classes did not meet the minimum levels required for agreement as appropriate diagnostic classes: facet syndrome, chronic pain behavior, muscle strain, iliolumbar ligament sprain, posterior ligament sprain, and myofascial dysfunction. Conclusion and Discussion. The importance of developing homogeneous subgroups of patients with LBP based on constellations of reliable clinical findings is emphasized.",
keywords = "Delphi technique, Diagnosis, Low back pain, Lumbar spine, Syndromes",
author = "J. Binkley and E. Finch and J. Hall and T. Black and C. Gowland and DeRosa, {Carl P} and P. Beattie and Roy, {S. H.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "138--155",
journal = "Physical Therapy",
issn = "0031-9023",
publisher = "American Physical Therapy Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic classification of patients with low back pain

T2 - Report on a survey of physical therapy experts

AU - Binkley, J.

AU - Finch, E.

AU - Hall, J.

AU - Black, T.

AU - Gowland, C.

AU - DeRosa, Carl P

AU - Beattie, P.

AU - Roy, S. H.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Background and Purpose. A survey of expert orthopedic physical therapists was conducted to assist in the development of a classification system for patients with low back pain (LBP). The goal of the survey was to measure levels of agreement on labels and accompanying constellations of signs and symptoms for subgroups of patients with LBP. Subjects. Twenty-four of the 30 expert orthopedic physical therapists who were originally contacted responded to the survey request. Methods. A modified Delphi technique was used. The first stage involved a review of the literature and identification of 25 diagnostic classes of LBP. Experts were asked to rate the 'appropriateness' of each diagnostic class for inclusion in a classification scheme. Clinical findings relevant to each diagnostic class were identified and rated on the degree of 'essentialness' to that class. Results. Three diagnostic classes- hypomobility dysfunction, nerve root adhesion, and sacroiliac hypermobility- were distinct in that the agreement criteria for the appropriateness of diagnostic classes as well as the surveyed essential signs and symptoms were met. Six of the 25 diagnostic classes did not meet the minimum levels required for agreement as appropriate diagnostic classes: facet syndrome, chronic pain behavior, muscle strain, iliolumbar ligament sprain, posterior ligament sprain, and myofascial dysfunction. Conclusion and Discussion. The importance of developing homogeneous subgroups of patients with LBP based on constellations of reliable clinical findings is emphasized.

AB - Background and Purpose. A survey of expert orthopedic physical therapists was conducted to assist in the development of a classification system for patients with low back pain (LBP). The goal of the survey was to measure levels of agreement on labels and accompanying constellations of signs and symptoms for subgroups of patients with LBP. Subjects. Twenty-four of the 30 expert orthopedic physical therapists who were originally contacted responded to the survey request. Methods. A modified Delphi technique was used. The first stage involved a review of the literature and identification of 25 diagnostic classes of LBP. Experts were asked to rate the 'appropriateness' of each diagnostic class for inclusion in a classification scheme. Clinical findings relevant to each diagnostic class were identified and rated on the degree of 'essentialness' to that class. Results. Three diagnostic classes- hypomobility dysfunction, nerve root adhesion, and sacroiliac hypermobility- were distinct in that the agreement criteria for the appropriateness of diagnostic classes as well as the surveyed essential signs and symptoms were met. Six of the 25 diagnostic classes did not meet the minimum levels required for agreement as appropriate diagnostic classes: facet syndrome, chronic pain behavior, muscle strain, iliolumbar ligament sprain, posterior ligament sprain, and myofascial dysfunction. Conclusion and Discussion. The importance of developing homogeneous subgroups of patients with LBP based on constellations of reliable clinical findings is emphasized.

KW - Delphi technique

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Low back pain

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Syndromes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027497672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027497672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 138

EP - 155

JO - Physical Therapy

JF - Physical Therapy

SN - 0031-9023

IS - 3

ER -