Detecting extrasolar planets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The detection of extrasolar planets presents a good case in which to clarify the distinction between observation and inference from evidence. By asking whether these planets have been observed or inferred from evidence, and by using the scientific details to answer the question, we will get a clearer understanding of the epistemic difference between these two forms of information. The issue of scientific realism pivots on this distinction, and the results of this case will help to articulate the epistemically important factors in assessing theoretical claims.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224-236
Number of pages13
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Planet
Inference
Scientific Realism

Keywords

  • Observation
  • Planetary systems
  • Scientific method
  • Scientific realism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History

Cite this

Detecting extrasolar planets. / Kosso, Peter.

In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 37, No. 2, 06.2006, p. 224-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1ca71119b2e43efbb22bbb4988928f1,
title = "Detecting extrasolar planets",
abstract = "The detection of extrasolar planets presents a good case in which to clarify the distinction between observation and inference from evidence. By asking whether these planets have been observed or inferred from evidence, and by using the scientific details to answer the question, we will get a clearer understanding of the epistemic difference between these two forms of information. The issue of scientific realism pivots on this distinction, and the results of this case will help to articulate the epistemically important factors in assessing theoretical claims.",
keywords = "Observation, Planetary systems, Scientific method, Scientific realism",
author = "Peter Kosso",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "224--236",
journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A",
issn = "0039-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting extrasolar planets

AU - Kosso, Peter

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - The detection of extrasolar planets presents a good case in which to clarify the distinction between observation and inference from evidence. By asking whether these planets have been observed or inferred from evidence, and by using the scientific details to answer the question, we will get a clearer understanding of the epistemic difference between these two forms of information. The issue of scientific realism pivots on this distinction, and the results of this case will help to articulate the epistemically important factors in assessing theoretical claims.

AB - The detection of extrasolar planets presents a good case in which to clarify the distinction between observation and inference from evidence. By asking whether these planets have been observed or inferred from evidence, and by using the scientific details to answer the question, we will get a clearer understanding of the epistemic difference between these two forms of information. The issue of scientific realism pivots on this distinction, and the results of this case will help to articulate the epistemically important factors in assessing theoretical claims.

KW - Observation

KW - Planetary systems

KW - Scientific method

KW - Scientific realism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744938470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744938470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.05.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33744938470

VL - 37

SP - 224

EP - 236

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

SN - 0039-3681

IS - 2

ER -