Decentralisation Policy as Recentralisation Strategy: Forest Management Units and Community Forestry in Indonesia

M. A.K. Sahide, S. Supratman, A. Maryudi, Yeon-Su Kim, L. Giessen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critical political analyses on decentralisation policies have revealed that such approaches may not achieve their formal goal, and might even support centralisation efforts. A number of previous studies on decentralisation separated the analyses of administrative process from the analyses of political power of administrative actors across levels of government. Using bureaucratic politics theory, this article presents close examinations of both process and power relations reconfigured by decentralising and recentralising forces across governmental levels. This study illustrates how the Indonesian central government is on its way to reclaiming its authority for forest administration and management through so-called Forest Management Units (FMU) and closely related community forestry programmes. This study reveals that the sources of real contention in KPH and community forestry policies are the power struggles between national, provincial and district bureaucracies. The conceptual model and the results of this study contribute to the understanding of underlying dynamics of bureaucratic politics in the process of political power reconfigurations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)78-95
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Forestry Review
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

community forestry
political power
politics
decentralization
forestry
forest management
Indonesia
forestry policy
centralization
bureaucracy
power relations
management
community
power struggle
district
examination
policy
programme
central government

Keywords

  • bureaucratic politics
  • community forestry
  • Forest Management Units (FMU)
  • Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH)
  • power politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Ecology

Cite this

Decentralisation Policy as Recentralisation Strategy : Forest Management Units and Community Forestry in Indonesia. / Sahide, M. A.K.; Supratman, S.; Maryudi, A.; Kim, Yeon-Su; Giessen, L.

In: International Forestry Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 78-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07bcd99285244e59a09ec58e60e2c301,
title = "Decentralisation Policy as Recentralisation Strategy: Forest Management Units and Community Forestry in Indonesia",
abstract = "Critical political analyses on decentralisation policies have revealed that such approaches may not achieve their formal goal, and might even support centralisation efforts. A number of previous studies on decentralisation separated the analyses of administrative process from the analyses of political power of administrative actors across levels of government. Using bureaucratic politics theory, this article presents close examinations of both process and power relations reconfigured by decentralising and recentralising forces across governmental levels. This study illustrates how the Indonesian central government is on its way to reclaiming its authority for forest administration and management through so-called Forest Management Units (FMU) and closely related community forestry programmes. This study reveals that the sources of real contention in KPH and community forestry policies are the power struggles between national, provincial and district bureaucracies. The conceptual model and the results of this study contribute to the understanding of underlying dynamics of bureaucratic politics in the process of political power reconfigurations.",
keywords = "bureaucratic politics, community forestry, Forest Management Units (FMU), Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH), power politics",
author = "Sahide, {M. A.K.} and S. Supratman and A. Maryudi and Yeon-Su Kim and L. Giessen",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1505/146554816818206168",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "78--95",
journal = "International Forestry Review",
issn = "1465-5489",
publisher = "Commonwealth Forestry Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decentralisation Policy as Recentralisation Strategy

T2 - Forest Management Units and Community Forestry in Indonesia

AU - Sahide, M. A.K.

AU - Supratman, S.

AU - Maryudi, A.

AU - Kim, Yeon-Su

AU - Giessen, L.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Critical political analyses on decentralisation policies have revealed that such approaches may not achieve their formal goal, and might even support centralisation efforts. A number of previous studies on decentralisation separated the analyses of administrative process from the analyses of political power of administrative actors across levels of government. Using bureaucratic politics theory, this article presents close examinations of both process and power relations reconfigured by decentralising and recentralising forces across governmental levels. This study illustrates how the Indonesian central government is on its way to reclaiming its authority for forest administration and management through so-called Forest Management Units (FMU) and closely related community forestry programmes. This study reveals that the sources of real contention in KPH and community forestry policies are the power struggles between national, provincial and district bureaucracies. The conceptual model and the results of this study contribute to the understanding of underlying dynamics of bureaucratic politics in the process of political power reconfigurations.

AB - Critical political analyses on decentralisation policies have revealed that such approaches may not achieve their formal goal, and might even support centralisation efforts. A number of previous studies on decentralisation separated the analyses of administrative process from the analyses of political power of administrative actors across levels of government. Using bureaucratic politics theory, this article presents close examinations of both process and power relations reconfigured by decentralising and recentralising forces across governmental levels. This study illustrates how the Indonesian central government is on its way to reclaiming its authority for forest administration and management through so-called Forest Management Units (FMU) and closely related community forestry programmes. This study reveals that the sources of real contention in KPH and community forestry policies are the power struggles between national, provincial and district bureaucracies. The conceptual model and the results of this study contribute to the understanding of underlying dynamics of bureaucratic politics in the process of political power reconfigurations.

KW - bureaucratic politics

KW - community forestry

KW - Forest Management Units (FMU)

KW - Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH)

KW - power politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961661975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961661975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1505/146554816818206168

DO - 10.1505/146554816818206168

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961661975

VL - 18

SP - 78

EP - 95

JO - International Forestry Review

JF - International Forestry Review

SN - 1465-5489

IS - 1

ER -