Current progress and future opportunities in applications of bioinformatics for biodefense and pathogen detection: Report from the Winter Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up, College Park, MD, January 10, 2018

Jacquelyn S. Meisel, Daniel J. Nasko, Brian Brubach, Victoria Cepeda-Espinoza, Jessica Chopyk, Héctor Corrada-Bravo, Marcus Fedarko, Jay Ghurye, Kiran Javkar, Nathan D. Olson, Nidhi Shah, Sarah M. Allard, Adam L. Bazinet, Nicholas H. Bergman, Alexis Brown, James G Caporaso, Sean Conlan, Jocelyne Diruggiero, Samuel P. Forry, Nur A. HasanJason Kralj, Paul M. Luethy, Donald K. Milton, Brian D. Ondov, Sarah Preheim, Shashikala Ratnayake, Stephanie M. Rogers, M. J. Rosovitz, Eric G. Sakowski, Nils Oliver Schliebs, Daniel D. Sommer, Krista L. Ternus, Gherman Uritskiy, Sean X. Zhang, Mihai Pop, Todd J. Treangen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up (M 3 ) organization brings together academic, government, and industry groups to share ideas and develop best practices for microbiome research. In January of 2018, M 3 held its fourth meeting, which focused on recent advances in biodefense, specifically those relating to infectious disease, and the use of metagenomic methods for pathogen detection. Presentations highlighted the utility of next-generation sequencing technologies for identifying and tracking microbial community members across space and time. However, they also stressed the current limitations of genomic approaches for biodefense, including insufficient sensitivity to detect low-abundance pathogens and the inability to quantify viable organisms. Participants discussed ways in which the community can improve software usability and shared new computational tools for metagenomic processing, assembly, annotation, and visualization. Looking to the future, they identified the need for better bioinformatics toolkits for longitudinal analyses, improved sample processing approaches for characterizing viruses and fungi, and more consistent maintenance of database resources. Finally, they addressed the necessity of improving data standards to incentivize data sharing. Here, we summarize the presentations and discussions from the meeting, identifying the areas where microbiome analyses have improved our ability to detect and manage biological threats and infectious disease, as well as gaps of knowledge in the field that require future funding and focus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number197
JournalMicrobiome
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 5 2018

Fingerprint

Microbiota
Computational Biology
Metagenomics
Communicable Diseases
Information Dissemination
Practice Guidelines
Industry
Fungi
Software
Maintenance
Organizations
Databases
Viruses
Technology
Research

Keywords

  • Biodefense
  • Bioinformatics
  • Biothreats
  • Longitudinal analysis
  • Metagenomics
  • Microbiome
  • Pathogen detection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Current progress and future opportunities in applications of bioinformatics for biodefense and pathogen detection : Report from the Winter Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up, College Park, MD, January 10, 2018. / Meisel, Jacquelyn S.; Nasko, Daniel J.; Brubach, Brian; Cepeda-Espinoza, Victoria; Chopyk, Jessica; Corrada-Bravo, Héctor; Fedarko, Marcus; Ghurye, Jay; Javkar, Kiran; Olson, Nathan D.; Shah, Nidhi; Allard, Sarah M.; Bazinet, Adam L.; Bergman, Nicholas H.; Brown, Alexis; Caporaso, James G; Conlan, Sean; Diruggiero, Jocelyne; Forry, Samuel P.; Hasan, Nur A.; Kralj, Jason; Luethy, Paul M.; Milton, Donald K.; Ondov, Brian D.; Preheim, Sarah; Ratnayake, Shashikala; Rogers, Stephanie M.; Rosovitz, M. J.; Sakowski, Eric G.; Schliebs, Nils Oliver; Sommer, Daniel D.; Ternus, Krista L.; Uritskiy, Gherman; Zhang, Sean X.; Pop, Mihai; Treangen, Todd J.

In: Microbiome, Vol. 6, No. 1, 197, 05.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meisel, JS, Nasko, DJ, Brubach, B, Cepeda-Espinoza, V, Chopyk, J, Corrada-Bravo, H, Fedarko, M, Ghurye, J, Javkar, K, Olson, ND, Shah, N, Allard, SM, Bazinet, AL, Bergman, NH, Brown, A, Caporaso, JG, Conlan, S, Diruggiero, J, Forry, SP, Hasan, NA, Kralj, J, Luethy, PM, Milton, DK, Ondov, BD, Preheim, S, Ratnayake, S, Rogers, SM, Rosovitz, MJ, Sakowski, EG, Schliebs, NO, Sommer, DD, Ternus, KL, Uritskiy, G, Zhang, SX, Pop, M & Treangen, TJ 2018, 'Current progress and future opportunities in applications of bioinformatics for biodefense and pathogen detection: Report from the Winter Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up, College Park, MD, January 10, 2018', Microbiome, vol. 6, no. 1, 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0582-5
Meisel, Jacquelyn S. ; Nasko, Daniel J. ; Brubach, Brian ; Cepeda-Espinoza, Victoria ; Chopyk, Jessica ; Corrada-Bravo, Héctor ; Fedarko, Marcus ; Ghurye, Jay ; Javkar, Kiran ; Olson, Nathan D. ; Shah, Nidhi ; Allard, Sarah M. ; Bazinet, Adam L. ; Bergman, Nicholas H. ; Brown, Alexis ; Caporaso, James G ; Conlan, Sean ; Diruggiero, Jocelyne ; Forry, Samuel P. ; Hasan, Nur A. ; Kralj, Jason ; Luethy, Paul M. ; Milton, Donald K. ; Ondov, Brian D. ; Preheim, Sarah ; Ratnayake, Shashikala ; Rogers, Stephanie M. ; Rosovitz, M. J. ; Sakowski, Eric G. ; Schliebs, Nils Oliver ; Sommer, Daniel D. ; Ternus, Krista L. ; Uritskiy, Gherman ; Zhang, Sean X. ; Pop, Mihai ; Treangen, Todd J. / Current progress and future opportunities in applications of bioinformatics for biodefense and pathogen detection : Report from the Winter Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up, College Park, MD, January 10, 2018. In: Microbiome. 2018 ; Vol. 6, No. 1.
@article{47412d78f16944ffb48c2aeadd7cc595,
title = "Current progress and future opportunities in applications of bioinformatics for biodefense and pathogen detection: Report from the Winter Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up, College Park, MD, January 10, 2018",
abstract = "The Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up (M 3 ) organization brings together academic, government, and industry groups to share ideas and develop best practices for microbiome research. In January of 2018, M 3 held its fourth meeting, which focused on recent advances in biodefense, specifically those relating to infectious disease, and the use of metagenomic methods for pathogen detection. Presentations highlighted the utility of next-generation sequencing technologies for identifying and tracking microbial community members across space and time. However, they also stressed the current limitations of genomic approaches for biodefense, including insufficient sensitivity to detect low-abundance pathogens and the inability to quantify viable organisms. Participants discussed ways in which the community can improve software usability and shared new computational tools for metagenomic processing, assembly, annotation, and visualization. Looking to the future, they identified the need for better bioinformatics toolkits for longitudinal analyses, improved sample processing approaches for characterizing viruses and fungi, and more consistent maintenance of database resources. Finally, they addressed the necessity of improving data standards to incentivize data sharing. Here, we summarize the presentations and discussions from the meeting, identifying the areas where microbiome analyses have improved our ability to detect and manage biological threats and infectious disease, as well as gaps of knowledge in the field that require future funding and focus.",
keywords = "Biodefense, Bioinformatics, Biothreats, Longitudinal analysis, Metagenomics, Microbiome, Pathogen detection",
author = "Meisel, {Jacquelyn S.} and Nasko, {Daniel J.} and Brian Brubach and Victoria Cepeda-Espinoza and Jessica Chopyk and H{\'e}ctor Corrada-Bravo and Marcus Fedarko and Jay Ghurye and Kiran Javkar and Olson, {Nathan D.} and Nidhi Shah and Allard, {Sarah M.} and Bazinet, {Adam L.} and Bergman, {Nicholas H.} and Alexis Brown and Caporaso, {James G} and Sean Conlan and Jocelyne Diruggiero and Forry, {Samuel P.} and Hasan, {Nur A.} and Jason Kralj and Luethy, {Paul M.} and Milton, {Donald K.} and Ondov, {Brian D.} and Sarah Preheim and Shashikala Ratnayake and Rogers, {Stephanie M.} and Rosovitz, {M. J.} and Sakowski, {Eric G.} and Schliebs, {Nils Oliver} and Sommer, {Daniel D.} and Ternus, {Krista L.} and Gherman Uritskiy and Zhang, {Sean X.} and Mihai Pop and Treangen, {Todd J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1186/s40168-018-0582-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Microbiome",
issn = "2049-2618",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current progress and future opportunities in applications of bioinformatics for biodefense and pathogen detection

T2 - Report from the Winter Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up, College Park, MD, January 10, 2018

AU - Meisel, Jacquelyn S.

AU - Nasko, Daniel J.

AU - Brubach, Brian

AU - Cepeda-Espinoza, Victoria

AU - Chopyk, Jessica

AU - Corrada-Bravo, Héctor

AU - Fedarko, Marcus

AU - Ghurye, Jay

AU - Javkar, Kiran

AU - Olson, Nathan D.

AU - Shah, Nidhi

AU - Allard, Sarah M.

AU - Bazinet, Adam L.

AU - Bergman, Nicholas H.

AU - Brown, Alexis

AU - Caporaso, James G

AU - Conlan, Sean

AU - Diruggiero, Jocelyne

AU - Forry, Samuel P.

AU - Hasan, Nur A.

AU - Kralj, Jason

AU - Luethy, Paul M.

AU - Milton, Donald K.

AU - Ondov, Brian D.

AU - Preheim, Sarah

AU - Ratnayake, Shashikala

AU - Rogers, Stephanie M.

AU - Rosovitz, M. J.

AU - Sakowski, Eric G.

AU - Schliebs, Nils Oliver

AU - Sommer, Daniel D.

AU - Ternus, Krista L.

AU - Uritskiy, Gherman

AU - Zhang, Sean X.

AU - Pop, Mihai

AU - Treangen, Todd J.

PY - 2018/11/5

Y1 - 2018/11/5

N2 - The Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up (M 3 ) organization brings together academic, government, and industry groups to share ideas and develop best practices for microbiome research. In January of 2018, M 3 held its fourth meeting, which focused on recent advances in biodefense, specifically those relating to infectious disease, and the use of metagenomic methods for pathogen detection. Presentations highlighted the utility of next-generation sequencing technologies for identifying and tracking microbial community members across space and time. However, they also stressed the current limitations of genomic approaches for biodefense, including insufficient sensitivity to detect low-abundance pathogens and the inability to quantify viable organisms. Participants discussed ways in which the community can improve software usability and shared new computational tools for metagenomic processing, assembly, annotation, and visualization. Looking to the future, they identified the need for better bioinformatics toolkits for longitudinal analyses, improved sample processing approaches for characterizing viruses and fungi, and more consistent maintenance of database resources. Finally, they addressed the necessity of improving data standards to incentivize data sharing. Here, we summarize the presentations and discussions from the meeting, identifying the areas where microbiome analyses have improved our ability to detect and manage biological threats and infectious disease, as well as gaps of knowledge in the field that require future funding and focus.

AB - The Mid-Atlantic Microbiome Meet-up (M 3 ) organization brings together academic, government, and industry groups to share ideas and develop best practices for microbiome research. In January of 2018, M 3 held its fourth meeting, which focused on recent advances in biodefense, specifically those relating to infectious disease, and the use of metagenomic methods for pathogen detection. Presentations highlighted the utility of next-generation sequencing technologies for identifying and tracking microbial community members across space and time. However, they also stressed the current limitations of genomic approaches for biodefense, including insufficient sensitivity to detect low-abundance pathogens and the inability to quantify viable organisms. Participants discussed ways in which the community can improve software usability and shared new computational tools for metagenomic processing, assembly, annotation, and visualization. Looking to the future, they identified the need for better bioinformatics toolkits for longitudinal analyses, improved sample processing approaches for characterizing viruses and fungi, and more consistent maintenance of database resources. Finally, they addressed the necessity of improving data standards to incentivize data sharing. Here, we summarize the presentations and discussions from the meeting, identifying the areas where microbiome analyses have improved our ability to detect and manage biological threats and infectious disease, as well as gaps of knowledge in the field that require future funding and focus.

KW - Biodefense

KW - Bioinformatics

KW - Biothreats

KW - Longitudinal analysis

KW - Metagenomics

KW - Microbiome

KW - Pathogen detection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056099496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056099496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40168-018-0582-5

DO - 10.1186/s40168-018-0582-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 30396371

AN - SCOPUS:85056099496

VL - 6

JO - Microbiome

JF - Microbiome

SN - 2049-2618

IS - 1

M1 - 197

ER -