Cross subsidies in overhead application

Paul R. Koogler, Roxanne Stell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The problem with conventional costing in multiproduct manufacturing is that volume-related allocation bases used to apply overhead to products fail to correspond with the unique resource demands of each of a firm's many products. This paper compares overhead applied in a conventional cost system with that applied in a two-stage, activity-based system to illustrate how cross-subsidies occur (where a high-volume product subsidizes a low-volume and complex product). The sensitivity of cross-subsidies to volume and product diversity is addressed. Both volume diversity and product diversity distort product costs in conventional costing; whereas, activity-based costing generally provides more accurate costs. The paper also shows that in conventional cost systems, departmental overhead rates do not necessarily yield more accurate product costs than plant-wide rates. The conditions necessary for advantageous use of departmental rates are discussed. In addition, cost behavior analysis and the dual rate method, both subjects of managerial accounting for decades, can be applied to function as a two-stage, activity-based cost system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-159
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Accounting Education
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

subsidy
costs
behavior analysis
Cross-subsidies
Costs
manufacturing
firm
resources
Product diversity
Product cost
Costing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Education

Cite this

Cross subsidies in overhead application. / Koogler, Paul R.; Stell, Roxanne.

In: Journal of Accounting Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1991, p. 149-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koogler, Paul R. ; Stell, Roxanne. / Cross subsidies in overhead application. In: Journal of Accounting Education. 1991 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 149-159.
@article{9e6cc29c990244f09a49172e4de6e5c2,
title = "Cross subsidies in overhead application",
abstract = "The problem with conventional costing in multiproduct manufacturing is that volume-related allocation bases used to apply overhead to products fail to correspond with the unique resource demands of each of a firm's many products. This paper compares overhead applied in a conventional cost system with that applied in a two-stage, activity-based system to illustrate how cross-subsidies occur (where a high-volume product subsidizes a low-volume and complex product). The sensitivity of cross-subsidies to volume and product diversity is addressed. Both volume diversity and product diversity distort product costs in conventional costing; whereas, activity-based costing generally provides more accurate costs. The paper also shows that in conventional cost systems, departmental overhead rates do not necessarily yield more accurate product costs than plant-wide rates. The conditions necessary for advantageous use of departmental rates are discussed. In addition, cost behavior analysis and the dual rate method, both subjects of managerial accounting for decades, can be applied to function as a two-stage, activity-based cost system.",
author = "Koogler, {Paul R.} and Roxanne Stell",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1016/0748-5751(91)90028-P",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "149--159",
journal = "Journal of Accounting Education",
issn = "0748-5751",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross subsidies in overhead application

AU - Koogler, Paul R.

AU - Stell, Roxanne

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The problem with conventional costing in multiproduct manufacturing is that volume-related allocation bases used to apply overhead to products fail to correspond with the unique resource demands of each of a firm's many products. This paper compares overhead applied in a conventional cost system with that applied in a two-stage, activity-based system to illustrate how cross-subsidies occur (where a high-volume product subsidizes a low-volume and complex product). The sensitivity of cross-subsidies to volume and product diversity is addressed. Both volume diversity and product diversity distort product costs in conventional costing; whereas, activity-based costing generally provides more accurate costs. The paper also shows that in conventional cost systems, departmental overhead rates do not necessarily yield more accurate product costs than plant-wide rates. The conditions necessary for advantageous use of departmental rates are discussed. In addition, cost behavior analysis and the dual rate method, both subjects of managerial accounting for decades, can be applied to function as a two-stage, activity-based cost system.

AB - The problem with conventional costing in multiproduct manufacturing is that volume-related allocation bases used to apply overhead to products fail to correspond with the unique resource demands of each of a firm's many products. This paper compares overhead applied in a conventional cost system with that applied in a two-stage, activity-based system to illustrate how cross-subsidies occur (where a high-volume product subsidizes a low-volume and complex product). The sensitivity of cross-subsidies to volume and product diversity is addressed. Both volume diversity and product diversity distort product costs in conventional costing; whereas, activity-based costing generally provides more accurate costs. The paper also shows that in conventional cost systems, departmental overhead rates do not necessarily yield more accurate product costs than plant-wide rates. The conditions necessary for advantageous use of departmental rates are discussed. In addition, cost behavior analysis and the dual rate method, both subjects of managerial accounting for decades, can be applied to function as a two-stage, activity-based cost system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44949271109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44949271109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0748-5751(91)90028-P

DO - 10.1016/0748-5751(91)90028-P

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 149

EP - 159

JO - Journal of Accounting Education

JF - Journal of Accounting Education

SN - 0748-5751

IS - 1

ER -