Cranial movements during suction feeding in teleost fishes: Are they modified to enhance suction production?

Alice C Gibb, Lara Ferry-Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Suction is produced during prey capture by most teleost fishes. Here, we ask two questions about the functional basis of suction feeding. First, is there variation in the kinematic pattern produced by different species while suction feeding? Second, do species termed 'suction specialists' demonstrate similar modifications to their feeding behavior? We used 10 kinematic variables in a principal component analysis to identify axes of variation among 14 suction feeding teleost species (representing nine families and five orders within the Euteleostei) that demonstrate different feeding habits and habitats. MANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were used to assess differences among species. Most species clustered together on the principal component axes, suggesting a generalized mechanism that facilitates unidirectional flow. Typically, only one species stood out as 'extreme' on each functional axis, and a species that stood out on one axis did not stand out on others. Only one species, the flatfish Pleuronichthys verticalis, an obligate benthic feeder, demonstrated modifications consistent with enhanced suction production. This species displayed a suite of changes that should enhance suction production, including large hyoid depression, large cranial rotation, and small gape. We suggest that suction performance may be greatest in such obligate benthic feeders because cranial morphology is highly modified and prey are captured from the substrate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-153
Number of pages13
JournalZoology
Volume108
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 24 2005

Fingerprint

fish feeding
kinematics
Pleuronectiformes
interspecific variation
feeding behavior
principal component analysis
habitats
fish
testing
Pleuronichthys verticalis

Keywords

  • Benthic feeder
  • Cranial morphology
  • Feeding habits
  • Kinematics
  • Prey capture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Cranial movements during suction feeding in teleost fishes : Are they modified to enhance suction production? / Gibb, Alice C; Ferry-Graham, Lara.

In: Zoology, Vol. 108, No. 2, 24.06.2005, p. 141-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4165aa02348343c69973a3c94d89ed15,
title = "Cranial movements during suction feeding in teleost fishes: Are they modified to enhance suction production?",
abstract = "Suction is produced during prey capture by most teleost fishes. Here, we ask two questions about the functional basis of suction feeding. First, is there variation in the kinematic pattern produced by different species while suction feeding? Second, do species termed 'suction specialists' demonstrate similar modifications to their feeding behavior? We used 10 kinematic variables in a principal component analysis to identify axes of variation among 14 suction feeding teleost species (representing nine families and five orders within the Euteleostei) that demonstrate different feeding habits and habitats. MANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were used to assess differences among species. Most species clustered together on the principal component axes, suggesting a generalized mechanism that facilitates unidirectional flow. Typically, only one species stood out as 'extreme' on each functional axis, and a species that stood out on one axis did not stand out on others. Only one species, the flatfish Pleuronichthys verticalis, an obligate benthic feeder, demonstrated modifications consistent with enhanced suction production. This species displayed a suite of changes that should enhance suction production, including large hyoid depression, large cranial rotation, and small gape. We suggest that suction performance may be greatest in such obligate benthic feeders because cranial morphology is highly modified and prey are captured from the substrate.",
keywords = "Benthic feeder, Cranial morphology, Feeding habits, Kinematics, Prey capture",
author = "Gibb, {Alice C} and Lara Ferry-Graham",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.zool.2005.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "141--153",
journal = "Zoology",
issn = "0944-2006",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cranial movements during suction feeding in teleost fishes

T2 - Are they modified to enhance suction production?

AU - Gibb, Alice C

AU - Ferry-Graham, Lara

PY - 2005/6/24

Y1 - 2005/6/24

N2 - Suction is produced during prey capture by most teleost fishes. Here, we ask two questions about the functional basis of suction feeding. First, is there variation in the kinematic pattern produced by different species while suction feeding? Second, do species termed 'suction specialists' demonstrate similar modifications to their feeding behavior? We used 10 kinematic variables in a principal component analysis to identify axes of variation among 14 suction feeding teleost species (representing nine families and five orders within the Euteleostei) that demonstrate different feeding habits and habitats. MANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were used to assess differences among species. Most species clustered together on the principal component axes, suggesting a generalized mechanism that facilitates unidirectional flow. Typically, only one species stood out as 'extreme' on each functional axis, and a species that stood out on one axis did not stand out on others. Only one species, the flatfish Pleuronichthys verticalis, an obligate benthic feeder, demonstrated modifications consistent with enhanced suction production. This species displayed a suite of changes that should enhance suction production, including large hyoid depression, large cranial rotation, and small gape. We suggest that suction performance may be greatest in such obligate benthic feeders because cranial morphology is highly modified and prey are captured from the substrate.

AB - Suction is produced during prey capture by most teleost fishes. Here, we ask two questions about the functional basis of suction feeding. First, is there variation in the kinematic pattern produced by different species while suction feeding? Second, do species termed 'suction specialists' demonstrate similar modifications to their feeding behavior? We used 10 kinematic variables in a principal component analysis to identify axes of variation among 14 suction feeding teleost species (representing nine families and five orders within the Euteleostei) that demonstrate different feeding habits and habitats. MANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were used to assess differences among species. Most species clustered together on the principal component axes, suggesting a generalized mechanism that facilitates unidirectional flow. Typically, only one species stood out as 'extreme' on each functional axis, and a species that stood out on one axis did not stand out on others. Only one species, the flatfish Pleuronichthys verticalis, an obligate benthic feeder, demonstrated modifications consistent with enhanced suction production. This species displayed a suite of changes that should enhance suction production, including large hyoid depression, large cranial rotation, and small gape. We suggest that suction performance may be greatest in such obligate benthic feeders because cranial morphology is highly modified and prey are captured from the substrate.

KW - Benthic feeder

KW - Cranial morphology

KW - Feeding habits

KW - Kinematics

KW - Prey capture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444427279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20444427279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.zool.2005.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.zool.2005.03.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 16351962

AN - SCOPUS:20444427279

VL - 108

SP - 141

EP - 153

JO - Zoology

JF - Zoology

SN - 0944-2006

IS - 2

ER -