Conversion table for running on lower body positive pressure treadmills

John R. Kline, Scot Raab, Richard J Coast, Roger G Bounds, David K P McNeill, Hendrik de Heer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) or antigravity treadmills are becoming increasingly popular in sports and rehabilitation settings. Running at a decreased body weight (BW) reduces metabolic cost, which can be offset by running at faster speeds. To date, however, little is known about how much faster someone must run to offset the reduced metabolic cost. This study aimed to develop a user-friendly conversion table showing the speeds required on an LBPP treadmill to match the equivalent metabolic output on a regular, non-LBPP, treadmill across a range of body weight supports. A total of 20 recreational runners (11 males, 9 females) ran multiple 3-minute intervals on a regular treadmill and then on an LBPP treadmill at 6 different BWs (50-100%, 10% increments). Metabolic outputs were recorded and matched between the regular and LBPP treadmill sessions. Using regression analyses, a conversion table was successfully created for the speeds from 6.4 to 16.1 km·h -1 (4 to 10 mph) in 0.8 km·h -1 (0.5 mph) increments on the regular treadmill and BW proportions of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100% on an LBPP treadmill. The table showed that a greater increase in speed on the LBPP treadmill was needed with more support (p < 0.001) but that the proportion increase was smaller at higher speeds (p < 0.001). This research has implications for coaches or practitioners using or prescribing training on an LBPP treadmill.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)854-862
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 6 2015

Fingerprint

Running
Pressure
Body Weight
Metabolic Equivalent
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sports
Rehabilitation
Regression Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Alter-G®
  • Anti-gravity
  • Oxygen consumption
  • Rehabilitation
  • Running speed
  • Unloading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Conversion table for running on lower body positive pressure treadmills. / Kline, John R.; Raab, Scot; Coast, Richard J; Bounds, Roger G; McNeill, David K P; de Heer, Hendrik.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, 06.03.2015, p. 854-862.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d417d7b50c24903a377deef01083aef,
title = "Conversion table for running on lower body positive pressure treadmills",
abstract = "Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) or antigravity treadmills are becoming increasingly popular in sports and rehabilitation settings. Running at a decreased body weight (BW) reduces metabolic cost, which can be offset by running at faster speeds. To date, however, little is known about how much faster someone must run to offset the reduced metabolic cost. This study aimed to develop a user-friendly conversion table showing the speeds required on an LBPP treadmill to match the equivalent metabolic output on a regular, non-LBPP, treadmill across a range of body weight supports. A total of 20 recreational runners (11 males, 9 females) ran multiple 3-minute intervals on a regular treadmill and then on an LBPP treadmill at 6 different BWs (50-100{\%}, 10{\%} increments). Metabolic outputs were recorded and matched between the regular and LBPP treadmill sessions. Using regression analyses, a conversion table was successfully created for the speeds from 6.4 to 16.1 km·h -1 (4 to 10 mph) in 0.8 km·h -1 (0.5 mph) increments on the regular treadmill and BW proportions of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100{\%} on an LBPP treadmill. The table showed that a greater increase in speed on the LBPP treadmill was needed with more support (p < 0.001) but that the proportion increase was smaller at higher speeds (p < 0.001). This research has implications for coaches or practitioners using or prescribing training on an LBPP treadmill.",
keywords = "Alter-G{\circledR}, Anti-gravity, Oxygen consumption, Rehabilitation, Running speed, Unloading",
author = "Kline, {John R.} and Scot Raab and Coast, {Richard J} and Bounds, {Roger G} and McNeill, {David K P} and {de Heer}, Hendrik",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0000000000000658",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "854--862",
journal = "Strength and Conditioning Journal",
issn = "1524-1602",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conversion table for running on lower body positive pressure treadmills

AU - Kline, John R.

AU - Raab, Scot

AU - Coast, Richard J

AU - Bounds, Roger G

AU - McNeill, David K P

AU - de Heer, Hendrik

PY - 2015/3/6

Y1 - 2015/3/6

N2 - Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) or antigravity treadmills are becoming increasingly popular in sports and rehabilitation settings. Running at a decreased body weight (BW) reduces metabolic cost, which can be offset by running at faster speeds. To date, however, little is known about how much faster someone must run to offset the reduced metabolic cost. This study aimed to develop a user-friendly conversion table showing the speeds required on an LBPP treadmill to match the equivalent metabolic output on a regular, non-LBPP, treadmill across a range of body weight supports. A total of 20 recreational runners (11 males, 9 females) ran multiple 3-minute intervals on a regular treadmill and then on an LBPP treadmill at 6 different BWs (50-100%, 10% increments). Metabolic outputs were recorded and matched between the regular and LBPP treadmill sessions. Using regression analyses, a conversion table was successfully created for the speeds from 6.4 to 16.1 km·h -1 (4 to 10 mph) in 0.8 km·h -1 (0.5 mph) increments on the regular treadmill and BW proportions of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100% on an LBPP treadmill. The table showed that a greater increase in speed on the LBPP treadmill was needed with more support (p < 0.001) but that the proportion increase was smaller at higher speeds (p < 0.001). This research has implications for coaches or practitioners using or prescribing training on an LBPP treadmill.

AB - Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) or antigravity treadmills are becoming increasingly popular in sports and rehabilitation settings. Running at a decreased body weight (BW) reduces metabolic cost, which can be offset by running at faster speeds. To date, however, little is known about how much faster someone must run to offset the reduced metabolic cost. This study aimed to develop a user-friendly conversion table showing the speeds required on an LBPP treadmill to match the equivalent metabolic output on a regular, non-LBPP, treadmill across a range of body weight supports. A total of 20 recreational runners (11 males, 9 females) ran multiple 3-minute intervals on a regular treadmill and then on an LBPP treadmill at 6 different BWs (50-100%, 10% increments). Metabolic outputs were recorded and matched between the regular and LBPP treadmill sessions. Using regression analyses, a conversion table was successfully created for the speeds from 6.4 to 16.1 km·h -1 (4 to 10 mph) in 0.8 km·h -1 (0.5 mph) increments on the regular treadmill and BW proportions of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100% on an LBPP treadmill. The table showed that a greater increase in speed on the LBPP treadmill was needed with more support (p < 0.001) but that the proportion increase was smaller at higher speeds (p < 0.001). This research has implications for coaches or practitioners using or prescribing training on an LBPP treadmill.

KW - Alter-G®

KW - Anti-gravity

KW - Oxygen consumption

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Running speed

KW - Unloading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924071173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924071173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000658

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000658

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 854

EP - 862

JO - Strength and Conditioning Journal

JF - Strength and Conditioning Journal

SN - 1524-1602

IS - 3

ER -