Confirmatory factor analysis of the Teacher Efficacy Scale for prospective teachers

Gypsy M Denzine, John B. Cooney, Rita McKenzie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Research on teacher self-efficacy has revealed substantive problems concerning the validity of instruments used to measure teacher self-efficacy beliefs. Although claims about the influence of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs on student achievement, success with curriculum innovation, and so on, may be true statements, one cannot make those claims on the basis of that body of evidence if the instruments are not valid measures of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs. Aims. The purpose of this investigation is to employ the use of modern confirmatory factor-analytic techniques to investigate the validity of the hypothesized dimensions of the Teacher Efficacy Scale (Gibson & Dembo, 1984; Woolfolk & Hoy, 1990). Sample. Participants for this investigation were 387 prospective teachers recruited from a university located in the south-western region of the DA. Participants for Study 2 were 131 prospective elementary teachers recruited from the same university as in Study I. Results. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) procedure was used to evaluate the goodness-of-fit for two theoretical models of the TES items. The proposed two- and three-factor models of teacher self-efficacy for prospective teachers were rejected. A re-specified three-factor model of the TES was then derived from theoretical and empirical considerations. The re-specified model hypothesized three dimensions: self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and external locus-of-causality. In Study 2, the re-specified three-factor measurement model was evaluated in a new sample. Results of the CFA procedure indicated satisfactory fit of the re-specified model to the data; however, the results were not consistent with predictions derived from social learning theory. Conclusions. The results of this study call into question the use of the TES and the interpretation of a large body of literature purporting to study the relationship of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs to important educational outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)689-708
Number of pages20
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Psychology
Volume75
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Self Efficacy
Statistical Factor Analysis
factor analysis
self-efficacy
teacher
analysis procedure
Causality
Curriculum
university
Theoretical Models
social learning
learning theory
Students
causality
Research
innovation
curriculum
TES
interpretation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Teacher Efficacy Scale for prospective teachers. / Denzine, Gypsy M; Cooney, John B.; McKenzie, Rita.

In: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 4, 12.2005, p. 689-708.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{071d1d4bd8a44be990f2b2243b7c6284,
title = "Confirmatory factor analysis of the Teacher Efficacy Scale for prospective teachers",
abstract = "Background. Research on teacher self-efficacy has revealed substantive problems concerning the validity of instruments used to measure teacher self-efficacy beliefs. Although claims about the influence of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs on student achievement, success with curriculum innovation, and so on, may be true statements, one cannot make those claims on the basis of that body of evidence if the instruments are not valid measures of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs. Aims. The purpose of this investigation is to employ the use of modern confirmatory factor-analytic techniques to investigate the validity of the hypothesized dimensions of the Teacher Efficacy Scale (Gibson & Dembo, 1984; Woolfolk & Hoy, 1990). Sample. Participants for this investigation were 387 prospective teachers recruited from a university located in the south-western region of the DA. Participants for Study 2 were 131 prospective elementary teachers recruited from the same university as in Study I. Results. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) procedure was used to evaluate the goodness-of-fit for two theoretical models of the TES items. The proposed two- and three-factor models of teacher self-efficacy for prospective teachers were rejected. A re-specified three-factor model of the TES was then derived from theoretical and empirical considerations. The re-specified model hypothesized three dimensions: self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and external locus-of-causality. In Study 2, the re-specified three-factor measurement model was evaluated in a new sample. Results of the CFA procedure indicated satisfactory fit of the re-specified model to the data; however, the results were not consistent with predictions derived from social learning theory. Conclusions. The results of this study call into question the use of the TES and the interpretation of a large body of literature purporting to study the relationship of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs to important educational outcomes.",
author = "Denzine, {Gypsy M} and Cooney, {John B.} and Rita McKenzie",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1348/000709905X37253",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "689--708",
journal = "British Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0007-0998",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confirmatory factor analysis of the Teacher Efficacy Scale for prospective teachers

AU - Denzine, Gypsy M

AU - Cooney, John B.

AU - McKenzie, Rita

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Background. Research on teacher self-efficacy has revealed substantive problems concerning the validity of instruments used to measure teacher self-efficacy beliefs. Although claims about the influence of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs on student achievement, success with curriculum innovation, and so on, may be true statements, one cannot make those claims on the basis of that body of evidence if the instruments are not valid measures of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs. Aims. The purpose of this investigation is to employ the use of modern confirmatory factor-analytic techniques to investigate the validity of the hypothesized dimensions of the Teacher Efficacy Scale (Gibson & Dembo, 1984; Woolfolk & Hoy, 1990). Sample. Participants for this investigation were 387 prospective teachers recruited from a university located in the south-western region of the DA. Participants for Study 2 were 131 prospective elementary teachers recruited from the same university as in Study I. Results. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) procedure was used to evaluate the goodness-of-fit for two theoretical models of the TES items. The proposed two- and three-factor models of teacher self-efficacy for prospective teachers were rejected. A re-specified three-factor model of the TES was then derived from theoretical and empirical considerations. The re-specified model hypothesized three dimensions: self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and external locus-of-causality. In Study 2, the re-specified three-factor measurement model was evaluated in a new sample. Results of the CFA procedure indicated satisfactory fit of the re-specified model to the data; however, the results were not consistent with predictions derived from social learning theory. Conclusions. The results of this study call into question the use of the TES and the interpretation of a large body of literature purporting to study the relationship of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs to important educational outcomes.

AB - Background. Research on teacher self-efficacy has revealed substantive problems concerning the validity of instruments used to measure teacher self-efficacy beliefs. Although claims about the influence of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs on student achievement, success with curriculum innovation, and so on, may be true statements, one cannot make those claims on the basis of that body of evidence if the instruments are not valid measures of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs. Aims. The purpose of this investigation is to employ the use of modern confirmatory factor-analytic techniques to investigate the validity of the hypothesized dimensions of the Teacher Efficacy Scale (Gibson & Dembo, 1984; Woolfolk & Hoy, 1990). Sample. Participants for this investigation were 387 prospective teachers recruited from a university located in the south-western region of the DA. Participants for Study 2 were 131 prospective elementary teachers recruited from the same university as in Study I. Results. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) procedure was used to evaluate the goodness-of-fit for two theoretical models of the TES items. The proposed two- and three-factor models of teacher self-efficacy for prospective teachers were rejected. A re-specified three-factor model of the TES was then derived from theoretical and empirical considerations. The re-specified model hypothesized three dimensions: self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and external locus-of-causality. In Study 2, the re-specified three-factor measurement model was evaluated in a new sample. Results of the CFA procedure indicated satisfactory fit of the re-specified model to the data; however, the results were not consistent with predictions derived from social learning theory. Conclusions. The results of this study call into question the use of the TES and the interpretation of a large body of literature purporting to study the relationship of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs to important educational outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28744450193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28744450193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1348/000709905X37253

DO - 10.1348/000709905X37253

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 689

EP - 708

JO - British Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - British Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0007-0998

IS - 4

ER -