Comparison of central pit craters on Mars, Mercury, Ganymede, and the Saturnian satellites

Nadine Barlow, Sierra N. Ferguson, Ryan M. Horstman, Aviva Maine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report on the first results of a large-scale comparison study of central pit craters throughout the solar system, focused on Mars, Mercury, Ganymede, Rhea, Dione, and Tethys. We have identified 10 more central pit craters on Rhea, Dione, and Tethys than have previously been reported. We see a general trend that the median ratio of the pit to crater diameter (Dp/Dc) decreases with increasing gravity and decreasing volatile content of the crust. Floor pits are more common on volatile-rich bodies while summit pits become more common as crustal volatile content decreases. Uplifted bedrock from below the crater floor occurs in the central peak upon which summit pits are found and in rims around floor pits, which may or may not break the surface. Peaks on which summit pits are found on Mars and Mercury share similar characteristics to those of nonpitted central peaks, indicating that some normal central peaks undergo an additional process to create summit pits. Martian floor pits do not appear to be the result of a central peak collapse as the median ratio of the peak to crater diameter (Dpk/Dc) is about twice as high for central peaks/summit pits than Dp/Dc values for floor pits. Median Dpk/Dc is twice as high for Mars as for Mercury, reflecting differing crustal strength between the two bodies. Results indicate that a complicated interplay of crustal volatiles, target strength, surface gravity, and impactor energy along with both uplift and collapse are involved in central pit formation. Multiple formation models may be required to explain the range of central pits seen throughout the solar system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMeteoritics and Planetary Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Ganymede
craters
mars
crater
Mars
Tethys
solar system
gravity
target strength
bedrock
Dione
uplift
comparison
mercury
crust
gravitation
energy
impactors
rims

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Comparison of central pit craters on Mars, Mercury, Ganymede, and the Saturnian satellites. / Barlow, Nadine; Ferguson, Sierra N.; Horstman, Ryan M.; Maine, Aviva.

In: Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e134c06bcb094945a6c71c7d31a235ed,
title = "Comparison of central pit craters on Mars, Mercury, Ganymede, and the Saturnian satellites",
abstract = "We report on the first results of a large-scale comparison study of central pit craters throughout the solar system, focused on Mars, Mercury, Ganymede, Rhea, Dione, and Tethys. We have identified 10 more central pit craters on Rhea, Dione, and Tethys than have previously been reported. We see a general trend that the median ratio of the pit to crater diameter (Dp/Dc) decreases with increasing gravity and decreasing volatile content of the crust. Floor pits are more common on volatile-rich bodies while summit pits become more common as crustal volatile content decreases. Uplifted bedrock from below the crater floor occurs in the central peak upon which summit pits are found and in rims around floor pits, which may or may not break the surface. Peaks on which summit pits are found on Mars and Mercury share similar characteristics to those of nonpitted central peaks, indicating that some normal central peaks undergo an additional process to create summit pits. Martian floor pits do not appear to be the result of a central peak collapse as the median ratio of the peak to crater diameter (Dpk/Dc) is about twice as high for central peaks/summit pits than Dp/Dc values for floor pits. Median Dpk/Dc is twice as high for Mars as for Mercury, reflecting differing crustal strength between the two bodies. Results indicate that a complicated interplay of crustal volatiles, target strength, surface gravity, and impactor energy along with both uplift and collapse are involved in central pit formation. Multiple formation models may be required to explain the range of central pits seen throughout the solar system.",
author = "Nadine Barlow and Ferguson, {Sierra N.} and Horstman, {Ryan M.} and Aviva Maine",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/maps.12857",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Meteoritics and Planetary Science",
issn = "1086-9379",
publisher = "The University of Arkansas Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of central pit craters on Mars, Mercury, Ganymede, and the Saturnian satellites

AU - Barlow, Nadine

AU - Ferguson, Sierra N.

AU - Horstman, Ryan M.

AU - Maine, Aviva

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We report on the first results of a large-scale comparison study of central pit craters throughout the solar system, focused on Mars, Mercury, Ganymede, Rhea, Dione, and Tethys. We have identified 10 more central pit craters on Rhea, Dione, and Tethys than have previously been reported. We see a general trend that the median ratio of the pit to crater diameter (Dp/Dc) decreases with increasing gravity and decreasing volatile content of the crust. Floor pits are more common on volatile-rich bodies while summit pits become more common as crustal volatile content decreases. Uplifted bedrock from below the crater floor occurs in the central peak upon which summit pits are found and in rims around floor pits, which may or may not break the surface. Peaks on which summit pits are found on Mars and Mercury share similar characteristics to those of nonpitted central peaks, indicating that some normal central peaks undergo an additional process to create summit pits. Martian floor pits do not appear to be the result of a central peak collapse as the median ratio of the peak to crater diameter (Dpk/Dc) is about twice as high for central peaks/summit pits than Dp/Dc values for floor pits. Median Dpk/Dc is twice as high for Mars as for Mercury, reflecting differing crustal strength between the two bodies. Results indicate that a complicated interplay of crustal volatiles, target strength, surface gravity, and impactor energy along with both uplift and collapse are involved in central pit formation. Multiple formation models may be required to explain the range of central pits seen throughout the solar system.

AB - We report on the first results of a large-scale comparison study of central pit craters throughout the solar system, focused on Mars, Mercury, Ganymede, Rhea, Dione, and Tethys. We have identified 10 more central pit craters on Rhea, Dione, and Tethys than have previously been reported. We see a general trend that the median ratio of the pit to crater diameter (Dp/Dc) decreases with increasing gravity and decreasing volatile content of the crust. Floor pits are more common on volatile-rich bodies while summit pits become more common as crustal volatile content decreases. Uplifted bedrock from below the crater floor occurs in the central peak upon which summit pits are found and in rims around floor pits, which may or may not break the surface. Peaks on which summit pits are found on Mars and Mercury share similar characteristics to those of nonpitted central peaks, indicating that some normal central peaks undergo an additional process to create summit pits. Martian floor pits do not appear to be the result of a central peak collapse as the median ratio of the peak to crater diameter (Dpk/Dc) is about twice as high for central peaks/summit pits than Dp/Dc values for floor pits. Median Dpk/Dc is twice as high for Mars as for Mercury, reflecting differing crustal strength between the two bodies. Results indicate that a complicated interplay of crustal volatiles, target strength, surface gravity, and impactor energy along with both uplift and collapse are involved in central pit formation. Multiple formation models may be required to explain the range of central pits seen throughout the solar system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019118855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019118855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/maps.12857

DO - 10.1111/maps.12857

M3 - Article

JO - Meteoritics and Planetary Science

JF - Meteoritics and Planetary Science

SN - 1086-9379

ER -