Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional rearfoot motion during walking

Mark W Cornwall, TG G. McPoil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of two-dimensional (2-D) analysis with respect to three-dimensional (3-D) analysis for recording rearfoot motion during walking. The results of this study indicated that rearfoot motion measured with either 2-D or 3-D analysis is essentially the same for the initial 60% of the stance phase. There was no significant difference between the two methods on variables typically measured in studies dealing with rearfoot motion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-40
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Walking

Keywords

  • 2-dimensional analysis
  • 3-dimensional analysis
  • rearfoot motion
  • Walking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional rearfoot motion during walking. / Cornwall, Mark W; McPoil, TG G.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1995, p. 36-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{795d80d9402b429b9ae0475f167c8917,
title = "Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional rearfoot motion during walking",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of two-dimensional (2-D) analysis with respect to three-dimensional (3-D) analysis for recording rearfoot motion during walking. The results of this study indicated that rearfoot motion measured with either 2-D or 3-D analysis is essentially the same for the initial 60{\%} of the stance phase. There was no significant difference between the two methods on variables typically measured in studies dealing with rearfoot motion.",
keywords = "2-dimensional analysis, 3-dimensional analysis, rearfoot motion, Walking",
author = "Cornwall, {Mark W} and McPoil, {TG G.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0268-0033(95)90435-C",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "36--40",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional rearfoot motion during walking

AU - Cornwall, Mark W

AU - McPoil, TG G.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of two-dimensional (2-D) analysis with respect to three-dimensional (3-D) analysis for recording rearfoot motion during walking. The results of this study indicated that rearfoot motion measured with either 2-D or 3-D analysis is essentially the same for the initial 60% of the stance phase. There was no significant difference between the two methods on variables typically measured in studies dealing with rearfoot motion.

AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of two-dimensional (2-D) analysis with respect to three-dimensional (3-D) analysis for recording rearfoot motion during walking. The results of this study indicated that rearfoot motion measured with either 2-D or 3-D analysis is essentially the same for the initial 60% of the stance phase. There was no significant difference between the two methods on variables typically measured in studies dealing with rearfoot motion.

KW - 2-dimensional analysis

KW - 3-dimensional analysis

KW - rearfoot motion

KW - Walking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028830675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028830675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0268-0033(95)90435-C

DO - 10.1016/0268-0033(95)90435-C

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 36

EP - 40

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

IS - 1

ER -