Clinical comparisons: Phonological processes and their relationship to traditional phoneme acquisition norms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Two psycholinguistic philosophies of speech articulation development in children are the traditional and the phonological approaches. The traditional approach is perhaps the most widely used, and it is most useful for children whose speech differs from standard speech by only a few phonemes or who need oral sensorimotor stimulation. For severely unintelligible speech, many clinicians and teachers favor the phonological approach, with its emphasis on linguistic rules governing syllable formation. This article compares and contrasts the two approaches and the underlying psycholinguistic philosophies inherent in each.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-25
Number of pages11
JournalInfant-Toddler Intervention
Volume11
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Psycholinguistics
Linguistics
Child Development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{e250253a465241b9b45eebb4180df258,
title = "Clinical comparisons: Phonological processes and their relationship to traditional phoneme acquisition norms",
abstract = "Two psycholinguistic philosophies of speech articulation development in children are the traditional and the phonological approaches. The traditional approach is perhaps the most widely used, and it is most useful for children whose speech differs from standard speech by only a few phonemes or who need oral sensorimotor stimulation. For severely unintelligible speech, many clinicians and teachers favor the phonological approach, with its emphasis on linguistic rules governing syllable formation. This article compares and contrasts the two approaches and the underlying psycholinguistic philosophies inherent in each.",
author = "Culbertson, {William R} and Tanner, {Dennis C}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "15--25",
journal = "Infant-Toddler Intervention",
issn = "1053-5586",
publisher = "Delmar Learning",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical comparisons

T2 - Phonological processes and their relationship to traditional phoneme acquisition norms

AU - Culbertson, William R

AU - Tanner, Dennis C

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Two psycholinguistic philosophies of speech articulation development in children are the traditional and the phonological approaches. The traditional approach is perhaps the most widely used, and it is most useful for children whose speech differs from standard speech by only a few phonemes or who need oral sensorimotor stimulation. For severely unintelligible speech, many clinicians and teachers favor the phonological approach, with its emphasis on linguistic rules governing syllable formation. This article compares and contrasts the two approaches and the underlying psycholinguistic philosophies inherent in each.

AB - Two psycholinguistic philosophies of speech articulation development in children are the traditional and the phonological approaches. The traditional approach is perhaps the most widely used, and it is most useful for children whose speech differs from standard speech by only a few phonemes or who need oral sensorimotor stimulation. For severely unintelligible speech, many clinicians and teachers favor the phonological approach, with its emphasis on linguistic rules governing syllable formation. This article compares and contrasts the two approaches and the underlying psycholinguistic philosophies inherent in each.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035081309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035081309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035081309

VL - 11

SP - 15

EP - 25

JO - Infant-Toddler Intervention

JF - Infant-Toddler Intervention

SN - 1053-5586

IS - 1

ER -