Characterizations of a quality certified athletic trainer

Scot Raab, Brent D. Wolfe, Trenton E. Gould, Scott G. Piland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Didactic proficiency does not ensure clinical aptitude. Quality athletic health care requires clinical knowledge and affective traits. Objective: To develop a grounded theory explaining the constructs of a quality certified athletic trainer (AT). Design: Delphi study. Setting: Interviews in conference rooms or business offices and by telephone. Patients or Other Participants: Thirteen ATs (men = 8, women = 5) stratified across the largest employment settings (high school, college, clinical) in the 4 largest districts of the National Athletic Trainers' Association (2, 3, 4, 9). Data Collection and Analysis: Open-ended interview questions were audio recorded, transcribed, and reviewed before condensing. Two member checks ensured trustworthiness. Open coding reduced text to descriptive adjectives. Results: We grouped adjectives into 5 constructs (care, communication, commitment, integrity, knowledge) and grouped these constructs into 2 higher-order constructs (affective traits, effective traits). Conclusions: According to participants, ATs who demonstrate the ability to care, show commitment and integrity, value professional knowledge, and communicate effectively with others can be identified as quality ATs. These abilities facilitate the creation of positive relationships. These relationships allow the quality AT to interact with patients and other health care professionals on a knowledgeable basis that ultimately improves health care delivery. Our resulting theory supported the examination of characteristics not traditionally assessed in an athletic training education program. If researchers can show that these characteristics develop ATs into quality ATs (eg, those who work better with others, relate meaningfully with patients, and improve the standard of health care), they must be cultivated in the educational setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)672-679
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Athletic Training
Volume46
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Sports
Aptitude
Delivery of Health Care
Interviews
Delphi Technique
Education
Quality of Health Care
Standard of Care
Telephone
Communication
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Constructs
  • Data immersion
  • Think display

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Raab, S., Wolfe, B. D., Gould, T. E., & Piland, S. G. (2011). Characterizations of a quality certified athletic trainer. Journal of Athletic Training, 46(6), 672-679.

Characterizations of a quality certified athletic trainer. / Raab, Scot; Wolfe, Brent D.; Gould, Trenton E.; Piland, Scott G.

In: Journal of Athletic Training, Vol. 46, No. 6, 12.2011, p. 672-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raab, S, Wolfe, BD, Gould, TE & Piland, SG 2011, 'Characterizations of a quality certified athletic trainer', Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 672-679.
Raab, Scot ; Wolfe, Brent D. ; Gould, Trenton E. ; Piland, Scott G. / Characterizations of a quality certified athletic trainer. In: Journal of Athletic Training. 2011 ; Vol. 46, No. 6. pp. 672-679.
@article{5c2e88e4748349cfb11649ade0dba86a,
title = "Characterizations of a quality certified athletic trainer",
abstract = "Context: Didactic proficiency does not ensure clinical aptitude. Quality athletic health care requires clinical knowledge and affective traits. Objective: To develop a grounded theory explaining the constructs of a quality certified athletic trainer (AT). Design: Delphi study. Setting: Interviews in conference rooms or business offices and by telephone. Patients or Other Participants: Thirteen ATs (men = 8, women = 5) stratified across the largest employment settings (high school, college, clinical) in the 4 largest districts of the National Athletic Trainers' Association (2, 3, 4, 9). Data Collection and Analysis: Open-ended interview questions were audio recorded, transcribed, and reviewed before condensing. Two member checks ensured trustworthiness. Open coding reduced text to descriptive adjectives. Results: We grouped adjectives into 5 constructs (care, communication, commitment, integrity, knowledge) and grouped these constructs into 2 higher-order constructs (affective traits, effective traits). Conclusions: According to participants, ATs who demonstrate the ability to care, show commitment and integrity, value professional knowledge, and communicate effectively with others can be identified as quality ATs. These abilities facilitate the creation of positive relationships. These relationships allow the quality AT to interact with patients and other health care professionals on a knowledgeable basis that ultimately improves health care delivery. Our resulting theory supported the examination of characteristics not traditionally assessed in an athletic training education program. If researchers can show that these characteristics develop ATs into quality ATs (eg, those who work better with others, relate meaningfully with patients, and improve the standard of health care), they must be cultivated in the educational setting.",
keywords = "Constructs, Data immersion, Think display",
author = "Scot Raab and Wolfe, {Brent D.} and Gould, {Trenton E.} and Piland, {Scott G.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "672--679",
journal = "Journal of Athletic Training",
issn = "1062-6050",
publisher = "National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterizations of a quality certified athletic trainer

AU - Raab, Scot

AU - Wolfe, Brent D.

AU - Gould, Trenton E.

AU - Piland, Scott G.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Context: Didactic proficiency does not ensure clinical aptitude. Quality athletic health care requires clinical knowledge and affective traits. Objective: To develop a grounded theory explaining the constructs of a quality certified athletic trainer (AT). Design: Delphi study. Setting: Interviews in conference rooms or business offices and by telephone. Patients or Other Participants: Thirteen ATs (men = 8, women = 5) stratified across the largest employment settings (high school, college, clinical) in the 4 largest districts of the National Athletic Trainers' Association (2, 3, 4, 9). Data Collection and Analysis: Open-ended interview questions were audio recorded, transcribed, and reviewed before condensing. Two member checks ensured trustworthiness. Open coding reduced text to descriptive adjectives. Results: We grouped adjectives into 5 constructs (care, communication, commitment, integrity, knowledge) and grouped these constructs into 2 higher-order constructs (affective traits, effective traits). Conclusions: According to participants, ATs who demonstrate the ability to care, show commitment and integrity, value professional knowledge, and communicate effectively with others can be identified as quality ATs. These abilities facilitate the creation of positive relationships. These relationships allow the quality AT to interact with patients and other health care professionals on a knowledgeable basis that ultimately improves health care delivery. Our resulting theory supported the examination of characteristics not traditionally assessed in an athletic training education program. If researchers can show that these characteristics develop ATs into quality ATs (eg, those who work better with others, relate meaningfully with patients, and improve the standard of health care), they must be cultivated in the educational setting.

AB - Context: Didactic proficiency does not ensure clinical aptitude. Quality athletic health care requires clinical knowledge and affective traits. Objective: To develop a grounded theory explaining the constructs of a quality certified athletic trainer (AT). Design: Delphi study. Setting: Interviews in conference rooms or business offices and by telephone. Patients or Other Participants: Thirteen ATs (men = 8, women = 5) stratified across the largest employment settings (high school, college, clinical) in the 4 largest districts of the National Athletic Trainers' Association (2, 3, 4, 9). Data Collection and Analysis: Open-ended interview questions were audio recorded, transcribed, and reviewed before condensing. Two member checks ensured trustworthiness. Open coding reduced text to descriptive adjectives. Results: We grouped adjectives into 5 constructs (care, communication, commitment, integrity, knowledge) and grouped these constructs into 2 higher-order constructs (affective traits, effective traits). Conclusions: According to participants, ATs who demonstrate the ability to care, show commitment and integrity, value professional knowledge, and communicate effectively with others can be identified as quality ATs. These abilities facilitate the creation of positive relationships. These relationships allow the quality AT to interact with patients and other health care professionals on a knowledgeable basis that ultimately improves health care delivery. Our resulting theory supported the examination of characteristics not traditionally assessed in an athletic training education program. If researchers can show that these characteristics develop ATs into quality ATs (eg, those who work better with others, relate meaningfully with patients, and improve the standard of health care), they must be cultivated in the educational setting.

KW - Constructs

KW - Data immersion

KW - Think display

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84555190294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84555190294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 672

EP - 679

JO - Journal of Athletic Training

JF - Journal of Athletic Training

SN - 1062-6050

IS - 6

ER -