Catalyzing ecologies of transformative community partnerships

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Introduction “Community partnership” is a contested concept with many meanings ranging across a broad spectrum (Boyte & Farr, 1997; Butin, 2010; Jacoby & Associates, 1996). At one end, we find charitable service events that are relatively thin on collaboration, have few pedagogical implications, and avoid questions of power and genuine change. At the other end, we see a variety of long-term collaborative relationships for public work and political action built on patient dialogue; discernment of mutual and intersecting interests; sharply articulated and shared goals; careful definitions of roles, responsibilities, resources, and risks; reciprocal accountability; attention and efforts to thwart unacknowledged inequalities in power relationships; and regular critical evaluations leading to corresponding adjustments. Crafting partnerships in this way can have transformative democratic implications for communities, teaching and learning, scholarship, civic agency, and public power. I focus my discussion on these latter frontiers, where I think the work on community partnerships is most promising because it has the richest implications for enlivening our pedagogy, knowledge, and capacities for work and action that co-create change in response to challenges faced by polities, ecosystems, and institutions of higher education. I suggest that we ought to explore ways to move beyond a one-to-one community partner model to an approach that strives to catalyze transformative democratic ecologies among a variety of community partners. This approach to catalyzing community partnerships is inspired and informed by a vision at the heart of the community organizing tradition in the United States – that one of the most profound aspirations of public work and political action concerns revitalizing and co-creating publics (Boyte, 2015; Coles & Scarnati, 2015). By “publics,” I mean diverse groups of people with capacities, relationships, and passions for democratic action that enable us to resist the worst modes of power and related suffering while imaginatively engendering commonwealth in all sectors of life. Public work and political action always vitally concern specific challenges and possibilities. Yet, at the same time, the sharpest forms of community engagement inhabit these as opportunities for nurturing the demos in ways that exceed the issues at hand.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages147-157
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781316650011
ISBN (Print)9781107153783
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ecology
community
political action
responsibility
dialogue
event
Teaching
evaluation
resources
learning
education
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Coles, R. (2017). Catalyzing ecologies of transformative community partnerships. In The Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement (pp. 147-157). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316650011.015

Catalyzing ecologies of transformative community partnerships. / Coles, Romand.

The Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement. Cambridge University Press, 2017. p. 147-157.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Coles, R 2017, Catalyzing ecologies of transformative community partnerships. in The Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement. Cambridge University Press, pp. 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316650011.015
Coles R. Catalyzing ecologies of transformative community partnerships. In The Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement. Cambridge University Press. 2017. p. 147-157 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316650011.015
Coles, Romand. / Catalyzing ecologies of transformative community partnerships. The Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement. Cambridge University Press, 2017. pp. 147-157
@inbook{f73c3f5609694b1db31ccf32ea68cd01,
title = "Catalyzing ecologies of transformative community partnerships",
abstract = "Introduction “Community partnership” is a contested concept with many meanings ranging across a broad spectrum (Boyte & Farr, 1997; Butin, 2010; Jacoby & Associates, 1996). At one end, we find charitable service events that are relatively thin on collaboration, have few pedagogical implications, and avoid questions of power and genuine change. At the other end, we see a variety of long-term collaborative relationships for public work and political action built on patient dialogue; discernment of mutual and intersecting interests; sharply articulated and shared goals; careful definitions of roles, responsibilities, resources, and risks; reciprocal accountability; attention and efforts to thwart unacknowledged inequalities in power relationships; and regular critical evaluations leading to corresponding adjustments. Crafting partnerships in this way can have transformative democratic implications for communities, teaching and learning, scholarship, civic agency, and public power. I focus my discussion on these latter frontiers, where I think the work on community partnerships is most promising because it has the richest implications for enlivening our pedagogy, knowledge, and capacities for work and action that co-create change in response to challenges faced by polities, ecosystems, and institutions of higher education. I suggest that we ought to explore ways to move beyond a one-to-one community partner model to an approach that strives to catalyze transformative democratic ecologies among a variety of community partners. This approach to catalyzing community partnerships is inspired and informed by a vision at the heart of the community organizing tradition in the United States – that one of the most profound aspirations of public work and political action concerns revitalizing and co-creating publics (Boyte, 2015; Coles & Scarnati, 2015). By “publics,” I mean diverse groups of people with capacities, relationships, and passions for democratic action that enable us to resist the worst modes of power and related suffering while imaginatively engendering commonwealth in all sectors of life. Public work and political action always vitally concern specific challenges and possibilities. Yet, at the same time, the sharpest forms of community engagement inhabit these as opportunities for nurturing the demos in ways that exceed the issues at hand.",
author = "Romand Coles",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/9781316650011.015",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107153783",
pages = "147--157",
booktitle = "The Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Catalyzing ecologies of transformative community partnerships

AU - Coles, Romand

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Introduction “Community partnership” is a contested concept with many meanings ranging across a broad spectrum (Boyte & Farr, 1997; Butin, 2010; Jacoby & Associates, 1996). At one end, we find charitable service events that are relatively thin on collaboration, have few pedagogical implications, and avoid questions of power and genuine change. At the other end, we see a variety of long-term collaborative relationships for public work and political action built on patient dialogue; discernment of mutual and intersecting interests; sharply articulated and shared goals; careful definitions of roles, responsibilities, resources, and risks; reciprocal accountability; attention and efforts to thwart unacknowledged inequalities in power relationships; and regular critical evaluations leading to corresponding adjustments. Crafting partnerships in this way can have transformative democratic implications for communities, teaching and learning, scholarship, civic agency, and public power. I focus my discussion on these latter frontiers, where I think the work on community partnerships is most promising because it has the richest implications for enlivening our pedagogy, knowledge, and capacities for work and action that co-create change in response to challenges faced by polities, ecosystems, and institutions of higher education. I suggest that we ought to explore ways to move beyond a one-to-one community partner model to an approach that strives to catalyze transformative democratic ecologies among a variety of community partners. This approach to catalyzing community partnerships is inspired and informed by a vision at the heart of the community organizing tradition in the United States – that one of the most profound aspirations of public work and political action concerns revitalizing and co-creating publics (Boyte, 2015; Coles & Scarnati, 2015). By “publics,” I mean diverse groups of people with capacities, relationships, and passions for democratic action that enable us to resist the worst modes of power and related suffering while imaginatively engendering commonwealth in all sectors of life. Public work and political action always vitally concern specific challenges and possibilities. Yet, at the same time, the sharpest forms of community engagement inhabit these as opportunities for nurturing the demos in ways that exceed the issues at hand.

AB - Introduction “Community partnership” is a contested concept with many meanings ranging across a broad spectrum (Boyte & Farr, 1997; Butin, 2010; Jacoby & Associates, 1996). At one end, we find charitable service events that are relatively thin on collaboration, have few pedagogical implications, and avoid questions of power and genuine change. At the other end, we see a variety of long-term collaborative relationships for public work and political action built on patient dialogue; discernment of mutual and intersecting interests; sharply articulated and shared goals; careful definitions of roles, responsibilities, resources, and risks; reciprocal accountability; attention and efforts to thwart unacknowledged inequalities in power relationships; and regular critical evaluations leading to corresponding adjustments. Crafting partnerships in this way can have transformative democratic implications for communities, teaching and learning, scholarship, civic agency, and public power. I focus my discussion on these latter frontiers, where I think the work on community partnerships is most promising because it has the richest implications for enlivening our pedagogy, knowledge, and capacities for work and action that co-create change in response to challenges faced by polities, ecosystems, and institutions of higher education. I suggest that we ought to explore ways to move beyond a one-to-one community partner model to an approach that strives to catalyze transformative democratic ecologies among a variety of community partners. This approach to catalyzing community partnerships is inspired and informed by a vision at the heart of the community organizing tradition in the United States – that one of the most profound aspirations of public work and political action concerns revitalizing and co-creating publics (Boyte, 2015; Coles & Scarnati, 2015). By “publics,” I mean diverse groups of people with capacities, relationships, and passions for democratic action that enable us to resist the worst modes of power and related suffering while imaginatively engendering commonwealth in all sectors of life. Public work and political action always vitally concern specific challenges and possibilities. Yet, at the same time, the sharpest forms of community engagement inhabit these as opportunities for nurturing the demos in ways that exceed the issues at hand.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047973942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047973942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/9781316650011.015

DO - 10.1017/9781316650011.015

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85047973942

SN - 9781107153783

SP - 147

EP - 157

BT - The Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -