Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity

M. G. Anderson, P. J. Comer, Paul Beier, J. J. Lawler, C. A. Schloss, S. Buttrick, C. M. Albano, D. P. Faith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Geodiversity has been used as a surrogate for biodiversity when species locations are unknown, and this utility can be extended to situations where species locations are in flux. Recently, scientists have designed conservation networks that aim to explicitly represent the range of geophysical environments, identifying a network of physical stages that could sustain biodiversity while allowing for change in species composition in response to climate change. Because there is no standard approach to designing such networks, we compiled 8 case studies illustrating a variety of ways scientists have approached the challenge. These studies show how geodiversity has been partitioned and used to develop site portfolios and connectivity designs; how geodiversity-based portfolios compare with those derived from species and communities; and how the selection and combination of variables influences the results. Collectively, they suggest 4 key steps when using geodiversity to augment traditional biodiversity-based conservation planning: create land units from species-relevant variables combined in an ecologically meaningful way; represent land units in a logical spatial configuration and integrate with species locations when possible, apply selection criteria to individual sites to ensure they are appropriate for conservation; and develop connectivity among sites to maintain movements and processes. With these considerations, conservationists can design more effective site portfolios to ensure the lasting conservation of biodiversity under a changing climate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)680-691
Number of pages12
JournalConservation Biology
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

geodiversity
biodiversity
case studies
climate change
connectivity
selection criteria
planning
conservation planning
species diversity
plan
climate

Keywords

  • Abiotic surrogates
  • Conservation planning
  • Conserving nature's stage
  • Geodiversity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Anderson, M. G., Comer, P. J., Beier, P., Lawler, J. J., Schloss, C. A., Buttrick, S., ... Faith, D. P. (2015). Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity. Conservation Biology, 29(3), 680-691. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12503

Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity. / Anderson, M. G.; Comer, P. J.; Beier, Paul; Lawler, J. J.; Schloss, C. A.; Buttrick, S.; Albano, C. M.; Faith, D. P.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 680-691.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, MG, Comer, PJ, Beier, P, Lawler, JJ, Schloss, CA, Buttrick, S, Albano, CM & Faith, DP 2015, 'Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity', Conservation Biology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 680-691. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12503
Anderson MG, Comer PJ, Beier P, Lawler JJ, Schloss CA, Buttrick S et al. Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity. Conservation Biology. 2015 Jun 1;29(3):680-691. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12503
Anderson, M. G. ; Comer, P. J. ; Beier, Paul ; Lawler, J. J. ; Schloss, C. A. ; Buttrick, S. ; Albano, C. M. ; Faith, D. P. / Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity. In: Conservation Biology. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 680-691.
@article{8db2039a78d742c4bc6e91e7dbe26aac,
title = "Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity",
abstract = "Geodiversity has been used as a surrogate for biodiversity when species locations are unknown, and this utility can be extended to situations where species locations are in flux. Recently, scientists have designed conservation networks that aim to explicitly represent the range of geophysical environments, identifying a network of physical stages that could sustain biodiversity while allowing for change in species composition in response to climate change. Because there is no standard approach to designing such networks, we compiled 8 case studies illustrating a variety of ways scientists have approached the challenge. These studies show how geodiversity has been partitioned and used to develop site portfolios and connectivity designs; how geodiversity-based portfolios compare with those derived from species and communities; and how the selection and combination of variables influences the results. Collectively, they suggest 4 key steps when using geodiversity to augment traditional biodiversity-based conservation planning: create land units from species-relevant variables combined in an ecologically meaningful way; represent land units in a logical spatial configuration and integrate with species locations when possible, apply selection criteria to individual sites to ensure they are appropriate for conservation; and develop connectivity among sites to maintain movements and processes. With these considerations, conservationists can design more effective site portfolios to ensure the lasting conservation of biodiversity under a changing climate.",
keywords = "Abiotic surrogates, Conservation planning, Conserving nature's stage, Geodiversity",
author = "Anderson, {M. G.} and Comer, {P. J.} and Paul Beier and Lawler, {J. J.} and Schloss, {C. A.} and S. Buttrick and Albano, {C. M.} and Faith, {D. P.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cobi.12503",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "680--691",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case studies of conservation plans that incorporate geodiversity

AU - Anderson, M. G.

AU - Comer, P. J.

AU - Beier, Paul

AU - Lawler, J. J.

AU - Schloss, C. A.

AU - Buttrick, S.

AU - Albano, C. M.

AU - Faith, D. P.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Geodiversity has been used as a surrogate for biodiversity when species locations are unknown, and this utility can be extended to situations where species locations are in flux. Recently, scientists have designed conservation networks that aim to explicitly represent the range of geophysical environments, identifying a network of physical stages that could sustain biodiversity while allowing for change in species composition in response to climate change. Because there is no standard approach to designing such networks, we compiled 8 case studies illustrating a variety of ways scientists have approached the challenge. These studies show how geodiversity has been partitioned and used to develop site portfolios and connectivity designs; how geodiversity-based portfolios compare with those derived from species and communities; and how the selection and combination of variables influences the results. Collectively, they suggest 4 key steps when using geodiversity to augment traditional biodiversity-based conservation planning: create land units from species-relevant variables combined in an ecologically meaningful way; represent land units in a logical spatial configuration and integrate with species locations when possible, apply selection criteria to individual sites to ensure they are appropriate for conservation; and develop connectivity among sites to maintain movements and processes. With these considerations, conservationists can design more effective site portfolios to ensure the lasting conservation of biodiversity under a changing climate.

AB - Geodiversity has been used as a surrogate for biodiversity when species locations are unknown, and this utility can be extended to situations where species locations are in flux. Recently, scientists have designed conservation networks that aim to explicitly represent the range of geophysical environments, identifying a network of physical stages that could sustain biodiversity while allowing for change in species composition in response to climate change. Because there is no standard approach to designing such networks, we compiled 8 case studies illustrating a variety of ways scientists have approached the challenge. These studies show how geodiversity has been partitioned and used to develop site portfolios and connectivity designs; how geodiversity-based portfolios compare with those derived from species and communities; and how the selection and combination of variables influences the results. Collectively, they suggest 4 key steps when using geodiversity to augment traditional biodiversity-based conservation planning: create land units from species-relevant variables combined in an ecologically meaningful way; represent land units in a logical spatial configuration and integrate with species locations when possible, apply selection criteria to individual sites to ensure they are appropriate for conservation; and develop connectivity among sites to maintain movements and processes. With these considerations, conservationists can design more effective site portfolios to ensure the lasting conservation of biodiversity under a changing climate.

KW - Abiotic surrogates

KW - Conservation planning

KW - Conserving nature's stage

KW - Geodiversity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929283379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929283379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.12503

DO - 10.1111/cobi.12503

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 680

EP - 691

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 3

ER -