Carbon credit possibilities and economic implications of fuel reduction treatments

Tibor Vegh, Ching-Hsun Huang, Alex Finkral

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We determined the difference in carbon (C) stocks and C emissions between treated and untreated ponderosa pine stands over 100 years on the Apache and Sitgreaves National Forests, Arizona, USA, under assumed treatment scenarios, wildfire frequency, and annual percentage of area burned. Compared with the no-action scenario, total C stocks (live and dead biomass) were lower in the treatment scenarios because of timber removals from thinnings, whereas aboveground live C stocks were higher in the treatment scenarios. When total C stocks were used as the baseline, net present values (NPVs) of treatments were in the range of -$759.42 and -$722.58 ha1 if timber and reduced requirement for C in a buffer pool were assumed to be creditable, and NPVs increased significantly if C in wood products was also eligible for C credit. When aboveground live C stocks were chosen as the baseline, NPVs ranged from -$759.42 to $2,700.44 ha-1 with revenues from timber stumpage value, reduced buffer pool, and/or C in wood products. C emissions from simulated wildfires were lower in the two treatment scenarios than in the no-action scenario. The heavier thinning treatment resulted in lower C emissions from wildfires than with the lighter thinning treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-65
Number of pages9
JournalWestern Journal of Applied Forestry
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest
carbon markets
wildfires
wildfire
thinning
timber
wood products
economics
carbon
buffers
stumpage
Pinus ponderosa
credit
income
biomass
wood product

Keywords

  • Carbon emissions
  • Carbon stocks
  • Long-lived wood products
  • Net present value
  • Reversal risk ratings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Carbon credit possibilities and economic implications of fuel reduction treatments. / Vegh, Tibor; Huang, Ching-Hsun; Finkral, Alex.

In: Western Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 28, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 57-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5522dccf2fe84f3e875ac66033fcc77b,
title = "Carbon credit possibilities and economic implications of fuel reduction treatments",
abstract = "We determined the difference in carbon (C) stocks and C emissions between treated and untreated ponderosa pine stands over 100 years on the Apache and Sitgreaves National Forests, Arizona, USA, under assumed treatment scenarios, wildfire frequency, and annual percentage of area burned. Compared with the no-action scenario, total C stocks (live and dead biomass) were lower in the treatment scenarios because of timber removals from thinnings, whereas aboveground live C stocks were higher in the treatment scenarios. When total C stocks were used as the baseline, net present values (NPVs) of treatments were in the range of -$759.42 and -$722.58 ha1 if timber and reduced requirement for C in a buffer pool were assumed to be creditable, and NPVs increased significantly if C in wood products was also eligible for C credit. When aboveground live C stocks were chosen as the baseline, NPVs ranged from -$759.42 to $2,700.44 ha-1 with revenues from timber stumpage value, reduced buffer pool, and/or C in wood products. C emissions from simulated wildfires were lower in the two treatment scenarios than in the no-action scenario. The heavier thinning treatment resulted in lower C emissions from wildfires than with the lighter thinning treatment.",
keywords = "Carbon emissions, Carbon stocks, Long-lived wood products, Net present value, Reversal risk ratings",
author = "Tibor Vegh and Ching-Hsun Huang and Alex Finkral",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.5849/wjaf.12-006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "57--65",
journal = "Western Journal of Applied Forestry",
issn = "0885-6095",
publisher = "Society of American Foresters",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carbon credit possibilities and economic implications of fuel reduction treatments

AU - Vegh, Tibor

AU - Huang, Ching-Hsun

AU - Finkral, Alex

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - We determined the difference in carbon (C) stocks and C emissions between treated and untreated ponderosa pine stands over 100 years on the Apache and Sitgreaves National Forests, Arizona, USA, under assumed treatment scenarios, wildfire frequency, and annual percentage of area burned. Compared with the no-action scenario, total C stocks (live and dead biomass) were lower in the treatment scenarios because of timber removals from thinnings, whereas aboveground live C stocks were higher in the treatment scenarios. When total C stocks were used as the baseline, net present values (NPVs) of treatments were in the range of -$759.42 and -$722.58 ha1 if timber and reduced requirement for C in a buffer pool were assumed to be creditable, and NPVs increased significantly if C in wood products was also eligible for C credit. When aboveground live C stocks were chosen as the baseline, NPVs ranged from -$759.42 to $2,700.44 ha-1 with revenues from timber stumpage value, reduced buffer pool, and/or C in wood products. C emissions from simulated wildfires were lower in the two treatment scenarios than in the no-action scenario. The heavier thinning treatment resulted in lower C emissions from wildfires than with the lighter thinning treatment.

AB - We determined the difference in carbon (C) stocks and C emissions between treated and untreated ponderosa pine stands over 100 years on the Apache and Sitgreaves National Forests, Arizona, USA, under assumed treatment scenarios, wildfire frequency, and annual percentage of area burned. Compared with the no-action scenario, total C stocks (live and dead biomass) were lower in the treatment scenarios because of timber removals from thinnings, whereas aboveground live C stocks were higher in the treatment scenarios. When total C stocks were used as the baseline, net present values (NPVs) of treatments were in the range of -$759.42 and -$722.58 ha1 if timber and reduced requirement for C in a buffer pool were assumed to be creditable, and NPVs increased significantly if C in wood products was also eligible for C credit. When aboveground live C stocks were chosen as the baseline, NPVs ranged from -$759.42 to $2,700.44 ha-1 with revenues from timber stumpage value, reduced buffer pool, and/or C in wood products. C emissions from simulated wildfires were lower in the two treatment scenarios than in the no-action scenario. The heavier thinning treatment resulted in lower C emissions from wildfires than with the lighter thinning treatment.

KW - Carbon emissions

KW - Carbon stocks

KW - Long-lived wood products

KW - Net present value

KW - Reversal risk ratings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877806095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877806095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5849/wjaf.12-006

DO - 10.5849/wjaf.12-006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877806095

VL - 28

SP - 57

EP - 65

JO - Western Journal of Applied Forestry

JF - Western Journal of Applied Forestry

SN - 0885-6095

IS - 2

ER -