Carbon and Water Use Efficiencies: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Terrestrial Ecosystem Models under Changing Climate

Bassil El Masri, Christopher Schwalm, Deborah N. Huntzinger, Jiafu Mao, Xiaoying Shi, Changhui Peng, Joshua B. Fisher, Atul K. Jain, Hanqin Tian, Benjamin Poulter, Anna M. Michalak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystems carbon and water cycles are tightly coupled through photosynthesis and evapotranspiration processes. The ratios of carbon stored to carbon uptake and water loss to carbon gain are key ecophysiological indicators essential to assess the magnitude and response of the terrestrial plant to the changing climate. Here, we use estimates from 10 terrestrial ecosystem models to quantify the impacts of climate, atmospheric CO2 concentration, and nitrogen (N) deposition on water use efficiency (WUE), and carbon use efficiency (CUE). We find that across models, WUE increases over the 20th Century particularly due to CO2 fertilization and N deposition and compares favorably to experimental studies. Also, the results show a decrease in WUE with climate for the last 3 decades, in contrasts with up-scaled flux observations that demonstrate a constant WUE. Modeled WUE responds minimally to climate with modeled CUE exhibiting no clear trend across space and time. The divergence between simulated and observationally-constrained WUE and CUE is driven by modeled NPP and autotrophic respiration, nitrogen cycle, carbon allocation, and soil moisture dynamics in current ecosystem models. We suggest that carbon-modeling community needs to reexamine stomatal conductance schemes and the soil-vegetation interactions for more robust modeling of carbon and water cycles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number14680
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

Climate
Ecosystem
Carbon
Water
Water Cycle
Carbon Cycle
Soil
Nitrogen Cycle
Photosynthesis
Fertilization
Respiration
Nitrogen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Carbon and Water Use Efficiencies : A Comparative Analysis of Ten Terrestrial Ecosystem Models under Changing Climate. / El Masri, Bassil; Schwalm, Christopher; Huntzinger, Deborah N.; Mao, Jiafu; Shi, Xiaoying; Peng, Changhui; Fisher, Joshua B.; Jain, Atul K.; Tian, Hanqin; Poulter, Benjamin; Michalak, Anna M.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, No. 1, 14680, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

El Masri, Bassil ; Schwalm, Christopher ; Huntzinger, Deborah N. ; Mao, Jiafu ; Shi, Xiaoying ; Peng, Changhui ; Fisher, Joshua B. ; Jain, Atul K. ; Tian, Hanqin ; Poulter, Benjamin ; Michalak, Anna M. / Carbon and Water Use Efficiencies : A Comparative Analysis of Ten Terrestrial Ecosystem Models under Changing Climate. In: Scientific Reports. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{daa661e1ba55406c86dcbe5144af79ce,
title = "Carbon and Water Use Efficiencies: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Terrestrial Ecosystem Models under Changing Climate",
abstract = "Terrestrial ecosystems carbon and water cycles are tightly coupled through photosynthesis and evapotranspiration processes. The ratios of carbon stored to carbon uptake and water loss to carbon gain are key ecophysiological indicators essential to assess the magnitude and response of the terrestrial plant to the changing climate. Here, we use estimates from 10 terrestrial ecosystem models to quantify the impacts of climate, atmospheric CO2 concentration, and nitrogen (N) deposition on water use efficiency (WUE), and carbon use efficiency (CUE). We find that across models, WUE increases over the 20th Century particularly due to CO2 fertilization and N deposition and compares favorably to experimental studies. Also, the results show a decrease in WUE with climate for the last 3 decades, in contrasts with up-scaled flux observations that demonstrate a constant WUE. Modeled WUE responds minimally to climate with modeled CUE exhibiting no clear trend across space and time. The divergence between simulated and observationally-constrained WUE and CUE is driven by modeled NPP and autotrophic respiration, nitrogen cycle, carbon allocation, and soil moisture dynamics in current ecosystem models. We suggest that carbon-modeling community needs to reexamine stomatal conductance schemes and the soil-vegetation interactions for more robust modeling of carbon and water cycles.",
author = "{El Masri}, Bassil and Christopher Schwalm and Huntzinger, {Deborah N.} and Jiafu Mao and Xiaoying Shi and Changhui Peng and Fisher, {Joshua B.} and Jain, {Atul K.} and Hanqin Tian and Benjamin Poulter and Michalak, {Anna M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-019-50808-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carbon and Water Use Efficiencies

T2 - A Comparative Analysis of Ten Terrestrial Ecosystem Models under Changing Climate

AU - El Masri, Bassil

AU - Schwalm, Christopher

AU - Huntzinger, Deborah N.

AU - Mao, Jiafu

AU - Shi, Xiaoying

AU - Peng, Changhui

AU - Fisher, Joshua B.

AU - Jain, Atul K.

AU - Tian, Hanqin

AU - Poulter, Benjamin

AU - Michalak, Anna M.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Terrestrial ecosystems carbon and water cycles are tightly coupled through photosynthesis and evapotranspiration processes. The ratios of carbon stored to carbon uptake and water loss to carbon gain are key ecophysiological indicators essential to assess the magnitude and response of the terrestrial plant to the changing climate. Here, we use estimates from 10 terrestrial ecosystem models to quantify the impacts of climate, atmospheric CO2 concentration, and nitrogen (N) deposition on water use efficiency (WUE), and carbon use efficiency (CUE). We find that across models, WUE increases over the 20th Century particularly due to CO2 fertilization and N deposition and compares favorably to experimental studies. Also, the results show a decrease in WUE with climate for the last 3 decades, in contrasts with up-scaled flux observations that demonstrate a constant WUE. Modeled WUE responds minimally to climate with modeled CUE exhibiting no clear trend across space and time. The divergence between simulated and observationally-constrained WUE and CUE is driven by modeled NPP and autotrophic respiration, nitrogen cycle, carbon allocation, and soil moisture dynamics in current ecosystem models. We suggest that carbon-modeling community needs to reexamine stomatal conductance schemes and the soil-vegetation interactions for more robust modeling of carbon and water cycles.

AB - Terrestrial ecosystems carbon and water cycles are tightly coupled through photosynthesis and evapotranspiration processes. The ratios of carbon stored to carbon uptake and water loss to carbon gain are key ecophysiological indicators essential to assess the magnitude and response of the terrestrial plant to the changing climate. Here, we use estimates from 10 terrestrial ecosystem models to quantify the impacts of climate, atmospheric CO2 concentration, and nitrogen (N) deposition on water use efficiency (WUE), and carbon use efficiency (CUE). We find that across models, WUE increases over the 20th Century particularly due to CO2 fertilization and N deposition and compares favorably to experimental studies. Also, the results show a decrease in WUE with climate for the last 3 decades, in contrasts with up-scaled flux observations that demonstrate a constant WUE. Modeled WUE responds minimally to climate with modeled CUE exhibiting no clear trend across space and time. The divergence between simulated and observationally-constrained WUE and CUE is driven by modeled NPP and autotrophic respiration, nitrogen cycle, carbon allocation, and soil moisture dynamics in current ecosystem models. We suggest that carbon-modeling community needs to reexamine stomatal conductance schemes and the soil-vegetation interactions for more robust modeling of carbon and water cycles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073152142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073152142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-019-50808-7

DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-50808-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 31604972

AN - SCOPUS:85073152142

VL - 9

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 14680

ER -