Biaxial ratchetting with novel variations of kinematic hardening

Yannis F. Dafalias, Heidi P Feigenbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Kinematic hardening and the associated concept of back-stress and its evolution are fundamental constitutive ingredients of classical plasticity theory used to simulate the inelastic material response under stress reversals. Cyclic plasticity addresses such response under a sequence of repeated stress reversals, which results in plastic strain accumulation, called ratchetting. Biaxial ratchetting occurs whenever the material is loaded in two directions although typically the cyclic loading is only in one direction. The realistic description of the material response during cyclic loading depends strongly on the kind of kinematic hardening used. This paper investigates the performance of some existing and novel kinematic hardening rules in the prediction of ratchetting. The multiplicative AF model by Dafalias et al. (2008a,b), which was originally applied to the simulation of uniaxial ratchetting, will be used here to simulate also biaxial ratchetting and will be compared with a model using the concept of a hardening stress threshold. The suggestion of Delobelle et al. (1995) to combine the Armstrong/Frederick and Burlet and Cailletaud (1986) kinematic hardening rules is incorporated in the aforementioned model and used to obtain improved simulations of biaxial ratchetting. After showing a deficiency of the foregoing suggestion which results in the possibility for the back-stress to cross it's bounding surface and induce a negative plastic modulus, a variation is proposed void of the foregoing deficiency, which is successfully tested in the simulation of multiple biaxial ratchetting experimental results on carbon steel 1026.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-491
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Plasticity
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Hardening
Kinematics
Plasticity
Carbon steel
Plastic deformation
Plastics
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Biaxial ratchetting
  • Cyclic plasticity
  • Kinematic hardening
  • Multicomponent
  • Multiplicative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Biaxial ratchetting with novel variations of kinematic hardening. / Dafalias, Yannis F.; Feigenbaum, Heidi P.

In: International Journal of Plasticity, Vol. 27, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 479-491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b3cc91918024189b9cf73bfcc2abd2d,
title = "Biaxial ratchetting with novel variations of kinematic hardening",
abstract = "Kinematic hardening and the associated concept of back-stress and its evolution are fundamental constitutive ingredients of classical plasticity theory used to simulate the inelastic material response under stress reversals. Cyclic plasticity addresses such response under a sequence of repeated stress reversals, which results in plastic strain accumulation, called ratchetting. Biaxial ratchetting occurs whenever the material is loaded in two directions although typically the cyclic loading is only in one direction. The realistic description of the material response during cyclic loading depends strongly on the kind of kinematic hardening used. This paper investigates the performance of some existing and novel kinematic hardening rules in the prediction of ratchetting. The multiplicative AF model by Dafalias et al. (2008a,b), which was originally applied to the simulation of uniaxial ratchetting, will be used here to simulate also biaxial ratchetting and will be compared with a model using the concept of a hardening stress threshold. The suggestion of Delobelle et al. (1995) to combine the Armstrong/Frederick and Burlet and Cailletaud (1986) kinematic hardening rules is incorporated in the aforementioned model and used to obtain improved simulations of biaxial ratchetting. After showing a deficiency of the foregoing suggestion which results in the possibility for the back-stress to cross it's bounding surface and induce a negative plastic modulus, a variation is proposed void of the foregoing deficiency, which is successfully tested in the simulation of multiple biaxial ratchetting experimental results on carbon steel 1026.",
keywords = "Biaxial ratchetting, Cyclic plasticity, Kinematic hardening, Multicomponent, Multiplicative",
author = "Dafalias, {Yannis F.} and Feigenbaum, {Heidi P}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "479--491",
journal = "International Journal of Plasticity",
issn = "0749-6419",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biaxial ratchetting with novel variations of kinematic hardening

AU - Dafalias, Yannis F.

AU - Feigenbaum, Heidi P

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Kinematic hardening and the associated concept of back-stress and its evolution are fundamental constitutive ingredients of classical plasticity theory used to simulate the inelastic material response under stress reversals. Cyclic plasticity addresses such response under a sequence of repeated stress reversals, which results in plastic strain accumulation, called ratchetting. Biaxial ratchetting occurs whenever the material is loaded in two directions although typically the cyclic loading is only in one direction. The realistic description of the material response during cyclic loading depends strongly on the kind of kinematic hardening used. This paper investigates the performance of some existing and novel kinematic hardening rules in the prediction of ratchetting. The multiplicative AF model by Dafalias et al. (2008a,b), which was originally applied to the simulation of uniaxial ratchetting, will be used here to simulate also biaxial ratchetting and will be compared with a model using the concept of a hardening stress threshold. The suggestion of Delobelle et al. (1995) to combine the Armstrong/Frederick and Burlet and Cailletaud (1986) kinematic hardening rules is incorporated in the aforementioned model and used to obtain improved simulations of biaxial ratchetting. After showing a deficiency of the foregoing suggestion which results in the possibility for the back-stress to cross it's bounding surface and induce a negative plastic modulus, a variation is proposed void of the foregoing deficiency, which is successfully tested in the simulation of multiple biaxial ratchetting experimental results on carbon steel 1026.

AB - Kinematic hardening and the associated concept of back-stress and its evolution are fundamental constitutive ingredients of classical plasticity theory used to simulate the inelastic material response under stress reversals. Cyclic plasticity addresses such response under a sequence of repeated stress reversals, which results in plastic strain accumulation, called ratchetting. Biaxial ratchetting occurs whenever the material is loaded in two directions although typically the cyclic loading is only in one direction. The realistic description of the material response during cyclic loading depends strongly on the kind of kinematic hardening used. This paper investigates the performance of some existing and novel kinematic hardening rules in the prediction of ratchetting. The multiplicative AF model by Dafalias et al. (2008a,b), which was originally applied to the simulation of uniaxial ratchetting, will be used here to simulate also biaxial ratchetting and will be compared with a model using the concept of a hardening stress threshold. The suggestion of Delobelle et al. (1995) to combine the Armstrong/Frederick and Burlet and Cailletaud (1986) kinematic hardening rules is incorporated in the aforementioned model and used to obtain improved simulations of biaxial ratchetting. After showing a deficiency of the foregoing suggestion which results in the possibility for the back-stress to cross it's bounding surface and induce a negative plastic modulus, a variation is proposed void of the foregoing deficiency, which is successfully tested in the simulation of multiple biaxial ratchetting experimental results on carbon steel 1026.

KW - Biaxial ratchetting

KW - Cyclic plasticity

KW - Kinematic hardening

KW - Multicomponent

KW - Multiplicative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952280540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952280540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 479

EP - 491

JO - International Journal of Plasticity

JF - International Journal of Plasticity

SN - 0749-6419

IS - 4

ER -