Being secure means being willing to say you´re sorry: Attachment style and the communication of relational dissatisfaction and disengagement.

Patricia Pizzano, John C Sherblom, Laura R Umphrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present study examines the influence of attachment style on the communication choices people make in response to relational dissatisfaction and disengagement. A path analysis models these choices, showing that a secure attachment style predicts the use of voice and de-escalation. A preoccupied style predicts neglect, loyalty, and de-escalation. A dismissing-avoidant style also leads to neglect and loyalty, but predicts behavioural de-escalation. Finally, a fearful-avoidant style indicates more limited communication choices and relational exit. The model shows the possibility of strategically made communication choices changing the results of these attachment style outcomes. Pathways through the model show that active communication choices lead to more positive long-term relational outcomes and passive choices predict relational challenges.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
JournalJournal of Relationships Research
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Attachment style
Dissatisfaction
Communication
Escalation
Neglect
Loyalty
Path analysis
Model choice
Exit
Pathway

Cite this

@article{b3dad24905b54ce88e4a7151fe214963,
title = "Being secure means being willing to say you´re sorry: Attachment style and the communication of relational dissatisfaction and disengagement.",
abstract = "The present study examines the influence of attachment style on the communication choices people make in response to relational dissatisfaction and disengagement. A path analysis models these choices, showing that a secure attachment style predicts the use of voice and de-escalation. A preoccupied style predicts neglect, loyalty, and de-escalation. A dismissing-avoidant style also leads to neglect and loyalty, but predicts behavioural de-escalation. Finally, a fearful-avoidant style indicates more limited communication choices and relational exit. The model shows the possibility of strategically made communication choices changing the results of these attachment style outcomes. Pathways through the model show that active communication choices lead to more positive long-term relational outcomes and passive choices predict relational challenges.",
author = "Patricia Pizzano and Sherblom, {John C} and Umphrey, {Laura R}",
year = "2013",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2013.7",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Journal of Relationships Research",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Being secure means being willing to say you´re sorry: Attachment style and the communication of relational dissatisfaction and disengagement.

AU - Pizzano, Patricia

AU - Sherblom, John C

AU - Umphrey, Laura R

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The present study examines the influence of attachment style on the communication choices people make in response to relational dissatisfaction and disengagement. A path analysis models these choices, showing that a secure attachment style predicts the use of voice and de-escalation. A preoccupied style predicts neglect, loyalty, and de-escalation. A dismissing-avoidant style also leads to neglect and loyalty, but predicts behavioural de-escalation. Finally, a fearful-avoidant style indicates more limited communication choices and relational exit. The model shows the possibility of strategically made communication choices changing the results of these attachment style outcomes. Pathways through the model show that active communication choices lead to more positive long-term relational outcomes and passive choices predict relational challenges.

AB - The present study examines the influence of attachment style on the communication choices people make in response to relational dissatisfaction and disengagement. A path analysis models these choices, showing that a secure attachment style predicts the use of voice and de-escalation. A preoccupied style predicts neglect, loyalty, and de-escalation. A dismissing-avoidant style also leads to neglect and loyalty, but predicts behavioural de-escalation. Finally, a fearful-avoidant style indicates more limited communication choices and relational exit. The model shows the possibility of strategically made communication choices changing the results of these attachment style outcomes. Pathways through the model show that active communication choices lead to more positive long-term relational outcomes and passive choices predict relational challenges.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2013.7

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2013.7

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Journal of Relationships Research

JF - Journal of Relationships Research

ER -