Bayesians in space

Using Bayesian methods to inform choice of spatial weights matrix in hedonic property analyses

Julie M Mueller, John B. Loomis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The choice of weights is a non-nested problem in most applied spatial econometric models. Despite numerous recent advances in spatial econometrics, the choice of spatial weights remains exogenously determined by the researcher in empirical applications. Bayesian techniques provide statistical evidence regarding the simultaneous choice of model specification and spatial weights matrices by using posterior probabilities. This paper demonstrates the Bayesian estimation approach in a spatial hedonic property model estimating the impacts of repeated wildfires on house prices in Southern California. We find that improper choice of spatial model and weights can result in up to 5 percent difference in estimated coefficients and in our case study up to a $15 Million difference in total benefits of reducing wildfires in Los Angeles County.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-255
Number of pages11
JournalReview of Regional Studies
Volume40
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

matrix
econometrics
wildfire
method
evidence
price

Keywords

  • Bayesian Estimation
  • Spatial Hedonic Models
  • Wildfires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Bayesians in space : Using Bayesian methods to inform choice of spatial weights matrix in hedonic property analyses. / Mueller, Julie M; Loomis, John B.

In: Review of Regional Studies, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2010, p. 245-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea9ef70070d9487fab00afdb8ad3d708,
title = "Bayesians in space: Using Bayesian methods to inform choice of spatial weights matrix in hedonic property analyses",
abstract = "The choice of weights is a non-nested problem in most applied spatial econometric models. Despite numerous recent advances in spatial econometrics, the choice of spatial weights remains exogenously determined by the researcher in empirical applications. Bayesian techniques provide statistical evidence regarding the simultaneous choice of model specification and spatial weights matrices by using posterior probabilities. This paper demonstrates the Bayesian estimation approach in a spatial hedonic property model estimating the impacts of repeated wildfires on house prices in Southern California. We find that improper choice of spatial model and weights can result in up to 5 percent difference in estimated coefficients and in our case study up to a $15 Million difference in total benefits of reducing wildfires in Los Angeles County.",
keywords = "Bayesian Estimation, Spatial Hedonic Models, Wildfires",
author = "Mueller, {Julie M} and Loomis, {John B.}",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "245--255",
journal = "Review of Regional Studies",
issn = "1553-0892",
publisher = "Oklahoma State University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bayesians in space

T2 - Using Bayesian methods to inform choice of spatial weights matrix in hedonic property analyses

AU - Mueller, Julie M

AU - Loomis, John B.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The choice of weights is a non-nested problem in most applied spatial econometric models. Despite numerous recent advances in spatial econometrics, the choice of spatial weights remains exogenously determined by the researcher in empirical applications. Bayesian techniques provide statistical evidence regarding the simultaneous choice of model specification and spatial weights matrices by using posterior probabilities. This paper demonstrates the Bayesian estimation approach in a spatial hedonic property model estimating the impacts of repeated wildfires on house prices in Southern California. We find that improper choice of spatial model and weights can result in up to 5 percent difference in estimated coefficients and in our case study up to a $15 Million difference in total benefits of reducing wildfires in Los Angeles County.

AB - The choice of weights is a non-nested problem in most applied spatial econometric models. Despite numerous recent advances in spatial econometrics, the choice of spatial weights remains exogenously determined by the researcher in empirical applications. Bayesian techniques provide statistical evidence regarding the simultaneous choice of model specification and spatial weights matrices by using posterior probabilities. This paper demonstrates the Bayesian estimation approach in a spatial hedonic property model estimating the impacts of repeated wildfires on house prices in Southern California. We find that improper choice of spatial model and weights can result in up to 5 percent difference in estimated coefficients and in our case study up to a $15 Million difference in total benefits of reducing wildfires in Los Angeles County.

KW - Bayesian Estimation

KW - Spatial Hedonic Models

KW - Wildfires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861001806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861001806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 245

EP - 255

JO - Review of Regional Studies

JF - Review of Regional Studies

SN - 1553-0892

IS - 3

ER -