Bathing with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate evidence and costs associated with central line-associated bloodstream infections

Hena N. Shah, Jennifer L. Schwartz, Gaye Luna, Deborah L. Cullen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a coordinated national effort reported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has reduced the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate by 40%. Conversely, a recent randomized clinical trial determined that chlorhexidine bathing did not reduce the CLABSI rate. The objectives of this study were to conduct meta-analysis and clarify the effectiveness of 2% CHG bathing by nurses on CLABSIs in adult intensive care unit patients and to determine the contributing costs attributable to CLABSIs and 2% CHG bathing. Eligible studies that included the outcome of bloodstream infection rate for central lines were considered. A rigorous systematic review protocol and software tools available from the Joanna Briggs Institute via OvidSPwere used. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tools assisted with identifiable CHG bathing costs. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis for the outcome of primary bloodstream infections, and 2 studies narratively supported the metaanalysis. A relative risk of 0.46 with 95% confidence interval (0.34-0.63) was determined. This significant effect is seen in an overall z-score of 4.84 (P <.0001). This meta-analysis supports that 2% CHG reduces CLABSIs. The estimated cost increase of 2% CHG-impregnated cloths is 4.10 versus nonmedicated bathing cloths. The cost associated with a single CLABSI is 10 times more than the cost of using 2% CHG-impregnated cloths. Nursing provides significant influence for the prevention of CLABSIs in critical care via evidence-based best practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-50
Number of pages9
JournalCritical Care Nursing Quarterly
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Costs and Cost Analysis
Infection
Meta-Analysis
Health Services Research
Chlorhexidine
Evidence-Based Practice
Critical Care
chlorhexidine gluconate
Practice Guidelines
Intensive Care Units
Nursing
Software
Randomized Controlled Trials
Nurses
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • adult
  • Bloodstream infection
  • Central venous catheter
  • Chlorhexidine bath
  • CLABSI
  • ICU
  • ICU nursing
  • Nursing intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care

Cite this

Bathing with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate evidence and costs associated with central line-associated bloodstream infections. / Shah, Hena N.; Schwartz, Jennifer L.; Luna, Gaye; Cullen, Deborah L.

In: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2016, p. 42-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f56176f9a99c434187a2acba94eccb43,
title = "Bathing with 2{\%} chlorhexidine gluconate evidence and costs associated with central line-associated bloodstream infections",
abstract = "In a coordinated national effort reported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the use of 2{\%} chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has reduced the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate by 40{\%}. Conversely, a recent randomized clinical trial determined that chlorhexidine bathing did not reduce the CLABSI rate. The objectives of this study were to conduct meta-analysis and clarify the effectiveness of 2{\%} CHG bathing by nurses on CLABSIs in adult intensive care unit patients and to determine the contributing costs attributable to CLABSIs and 2{\%} CHG bathing. Eligible studies that included the outcome of bloodstream infection rate for central lines were considered. A rigorous systematic review protocol and software tools available from the Joanna Briggs Institute via OvidSPwere used. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tools assisted with identifiable CHG bathing costs. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis for the outcome of primary bloodstream infections, and 2 studies narratively supported the metaanalysis. A relative risk of 0.46 with 95{\%} confidence interval (0.34-0.63) was determined. This significant effect is seen in an overall z-score of 4.84 (P <.0001). This meta-analysis supports that 2{\%} CHG reduces CLABSIs. The estimated cost increase of 2{\%} CHG-impregnated cloths is 4.10 versus nonmedicated bathing cloths. The cost associated with a single CLABSI is 10 times more than the cost of using 2{\%} CHG-impregnated cloths. Nursing provides significant influence for the prevention of CLABSIs in critical care via evidence-based best practices.",
keywords = "adult, Bloodstream infection, Central venous catheter, Chlorhexidine bath, CLABSI, ICU, ICU nursing, Nursing intervention",
author = "Shah, {Hena N.} and Schwartz, {Jennifer L.} and Gaye Luna and Cullen, {Deborah L.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "42--50",
journal = "Critical Care Nursing Quarterly",
issn = "0887-9303",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bathing with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate evidence and costs associated with central line-associated bloodstream infections

AU - Shah, Hena N.

AU - Schwartz, Jennifer L.

AU - Luna, Gaye

AU - Cullen, Deborah L.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In a coordinated national effort reported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has reduced the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate by 40%. Conversely, a recent randomized clinical trial determined that chlorhexidine bathing did not reduce the CLABSI rate. The objectives of this study were to conduct meta-analysis and clarify the effectiveness of 2% CHG bathing by nurses on CLABSIs in adult intensive care unit patients and to determine the contributing costs attributable to CLABSIs and 2% CHG bathing. Eligible studies that included the outcome of bloodstream infection rate for central lines were considered. A rigorous systematic review protocol and software tools available from the Joanna Briggs Institute via OvidSPwere used. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tools assisted with identifiable CHG bathing costs. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis for the outcome of primary bloodstream infections, and 2 studies narratively supported the metaanalysis. A relative risk of 0.46 with 95% confidence interval (0.34-0.63) was determined. This significant effect is seen in an overall z-score of 4.84 (P <.0001). This meta-analysis supports that 2% CHG reduces CLABSIs. The estimated cost increase of 2% CHG-impregnated cloths is 4.10 versus nonmedicated bathing cloths. The cost associated with a single CLABSI is 10 times more than the cost of using 2% CHG-impregnated cloths. Nursing provides significant influence for the prevention of CLABSIs in critical care via evidence-based best practices.

AB - In a coordinated national effort reported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has reduced the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate by 40%. Conversely, a recent randomized clinical trial determined that chlorhexidine bathing did not reduce the CLABSI rate. The objectives of this study were to conduct meta-analysis and clarify the effectiveness of 2% CHG bathing by nurses on CLABSIs in adult intensive care unit patients and to determine the contributing costs attributable to CLABSIs and 2% CHG bathing. Eligible studies that included the outcome of bloodstream infection rate for central lines were considered. A rigorous systematic review protocol and software tools available from the Joanna Briggs Institute via OvidSPwere used. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tools assisted with identifiable CHG bathing costs. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis for the outcome of primary bloodstream infections, and 2 studies narratively supported the metaanalysis. A relative risk of 0.46 with 95% confidence interval (0.34-0.63) was determined. This significant effect is seen in an overall z-score of 4.84 (P <.0001). This meta-analysis supports that 2% CHG reduces CLABSIs. The estimated cost increase of 2% CHG-impregnated cloths is 4.10 versus nonmedicated bathing cloths. The cost associated with a single CLABSI is 10 times more than the cost of using 2% CHG-impregnated cloths. Nursing provides significant influence for the prevention of CLABSIs in critical care via evidence-based best practices.

KW - adult

KW - Bloodstream infection

KW - Central venous catheter

KW - Chlorhexidine bath

KW - CLABSI

KW - ICU

KW - ICU nursing

KW - Nursing intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952360122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952360122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000096

DO - 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000096

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 42

EP - 50

JO - Critical Care Nursing Quarterly

JF - Critical Care Nursing Quarterly

SN - 0887-9303

IS - 1

ER -