Avian use of desert wildlife water developments as determined by remote videography

Janet C. Lynn, Steven S. Rosenstock, Carol L Chambers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the desert Southwest, migrating birds have been documented using upland habitat and xeroriparian washes as well as riparian areas. Yet aside from the river corridors, natural water sources (e.g., natural rock tanks [tinajas], springs, and ephemeral washes) in upland areas are scarce. Because of this scarcity, state and federal resource managers augmented water sources throughout the Southwest by constructing permanent wildlife water developments with the intention of enhancing game populations. However, despite these increases in free-standing water, there is a paucity of information on the use of water by birds during migration. Our objectives were to document use of these wildlife water developments by resident and migratory songbirds and assess the effectiveness of monitoring these species using remote color videography. We placed color video cameras at 2 wildlife water developments in southwestern Arizona during the spring and fall of 2004. Although we observed more use by migrants during spring than fall, overall use by migratory birds was low. However, the wildlife water developments were frequently used by resident birds. Remote videography provided continuous information on daily and seasonal patterns of bird use at wildlife water catchments with negligible disturbance by observers, yet for passerines, we felt that the benefits of remote videography did not justify the high cost of equipment purchase, installation, maintenance, and data processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-112
Number of pages6
JournalWestern North American Naturalist
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

videography
deserts
wildlife
desert
water
bird
birds
highlands
video cameras
songbird
color
riparian areas
passerine
managers
rocks
seasonal variation
catchment
disturbance

Keywords

  • Arizona
  • Neotropical migratory birds
  • Resident birds
  • Sonoran desert
  • Video cameras
  • Water developments
  • Xeroriparian washes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Avian use of desert wildlife water developments as determined by remote videography. / Lynn, Janet C.; Rosenstock, Steven S.; Chambers, Carol L.

In: Western North American Naturalist, Vol. 68, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 107-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a008b2f4c8084ddda4074bf397c48837,
title = "Avian use of desert wildlife water developments as determined by remote videography",
abstract = "In the desert Southwest, migrating birds have been documented using upland habitat and xeroriparian washes as well as riparian areas. Yet aside from the river corridors, natural water sources (e.g., natural rock tanks [tinajas], springs, and ephemeral washes) in upland areas are scarce. Because of this scarcity, state and federal resource managers augmented water sources throughout the Southwest by constructing permanent wildlife water developments with the intention of enhancing game populations. However, despite these increases in free-standing water, there is a paucity of information on the use of water by birds during migration. Our objectives were to document use of these wildlife water developments by resident and migratory songbirds and assess the effectiveness of monitoring these species using remote color videography. We placed color video cameras at 2 wildlife water developments in southwestern Arizona during the spring and fall of 2004. Although we observed more use by migrants during spring than fall, overall use by migratory birds was low. However, the wildlife water developments were frequently used by resident birds. Remote videography provided continuous information on daily and seasonal patterns of bird use at wildlife water catchments with negligible disturbance by observers, yet for passerines, we felt that the benefits of remote videography did not justify the high cost of equipment purchase, installation, maintenance, and data processing.",
keywords = "Arizona, Neotropical migratory birds, Resident birds, Sonoran desert, Video cameras, Water developments, Xeroriparian washes",
author = "Lynn, {Janet C.} and Rosenstock, {Steven S.} and Chambers, {Carol L}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.3398/1527-0904(2008)68[107:AUODWW]2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "107--112",
journal = "Western North American Naturalist",
issn = "1527-0904",
publisher = "Brigham Young University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Avian use of desert wildlife water developments as determined by remote videography

AU - Lynn, Janet C.

AU - Rosenstock, Steven S.

AU - Chambers, Carol L

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - In the desert Southwest, migrating birds have been documented using upland habitat and xeroriparian washes as well as riparian areas. Yet aside from the river corridors, natural water sources (e.g., natural rock tanks [tinajas], springs, and ephemeral washes) in upland areas are scarce. Because of this scarcity, state and federal resource managers augmented water sources throughout the Southwest by constructing permanent wildlife water developments with the intention of enhancing game populations. However, despite these increases in free-standing water, there is a paucity of information on the use of water by birds during migration. Our objectives were to document use of these wildlife water developments by resident and migratory songbirds and assess the effectiveness of monitoring these species using remote color videography. We placed color video cameras at 2 wildlife water developments in southwestern Arizona during the spring and fall of 2004. Although we observed more use by migrants during spring than fall, overall use by migratory birds was low. However, the wildlife water developments were frequently used by resident birds. Remote videography provided continuous information on daily and seasonal patterns of bird use at wildlife water catchments with negligible disturbance by observers, yet for passerines, we felt that the benefits of remote videography did not justify the high cost of equipment purchase, installation, maintenance, and data processing.

AB - In the desert Southwest, migrating birds have been documented using upland habitat and xeroriparian washes as well as riparian areas. Yet aside from the river corridors, natural water sources (e.g., natural rock tanks [tinajas], springs, and ephemeral washes) in upland areas are scarce. Because of this scarcity, state and federal resource managers augmented water sources throughout the Southwest by constructing permanent wildlife water developments with the intention of enhancing game populations. However, despite these increases in free-standing water, there is a paucity of information on the use of water by birds during migration. Our objectives were to document use of these wildlife water developments by resident and migratory songbirds and assess the effectiveness of monitoring these species using remote color videography. We placed color video cameras at 2 wildlife water developments in southwestern Arizona during the spring and fall of 2004. Although we observed more use by migrants during spring than fall, overall use by migratory birds was low. However, the wildlife water developments were frequently used by resident birds. Remote videography provided continuous information on daily and seasonal patterns of bird use at wildlife water catchments with negligible disturbance by observers, yet for passerines, we felt that the benefits of remote videography did not justify the high cost of equipment purchase, installation, maintenance, and data processing.

KW - Arizona

KW - Neotropical migratory birds

KW - Resident birds

KW - Sonoran desert

KW - Video cameras

KW - Water developments

KW - Xeroriparian washes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42249115260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42249115260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3398/1527-0904(2008)68[107:AUODWW]2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.3398/1527-0904(2008)68[107:AUODWW]2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 107

EP - 112

JO - Western North American Naturalist

JF - Western North American Naturalist

SN - 1527-0904

IS - 1

ER -