Abstract
Are consensus democracies more likely to enact environmentally friendly policies than majoritarian democracies? The relationship between democratic type and environmental effectiveness is more complex than previously assumed. What matters are not only institutions but also the nature of the policy issues, the types of institutions and veto players in the system. Four measures of effectiveness emerged from the data: mundane environmentalism; environmental taxation; conservation; and nuclear energy production. Environmental effectiveness in democratic systems differs depending upon which measure of effectiveness is examined and whether or not one looks at representational or organisational aspects of democracy.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 410-430 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Environmental Politics |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2008 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
Cite this
Are consensus democracies more environmentally effective? / Poloni-Staudinger, Lori.
In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 17, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 410-430.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Are consensus democracies more environmentally effective?
AU - Poloni-Staudinger, Lori
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - Are consensus democracies more likely to enact environmentally friendly policies than majoritarian democracies? The relationship between democratic type and environmental effectiveness is more complex than previously assumed. What matters are not only institutions but also the nature of the policy issues, the types of institutions and veto players in the system. Four measures of effectiveness emerged from the data: mundane environmentalism; environmental taxation; conservation; and nuclear energy production. Environmental effectiveness in democratic systems differs depending upon which measure of effectiveness is examined and whether or not one looks at representational or organisational aspects of democracy.
AB - Are consensus democracies more likely to enact environmentally friendly policies than majoritarian democracies? The relationship between democratic type and environmental effectiveness is more complex than previously assumed. What matters are not only institutions but also the nature of the policy issues, the types of institutions and veto players in the system. Four measures of effectiveness emerged from the data: mundane environmentalism; environmental taxation; conservation; and nuclear energy production. Environmental effectiveness in democratic systems differs depending upon which measure of effectiveness is examined and whether or not one looks at representational or organisational aspects of democracy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46249093343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46249093343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09644010802055634
DO - 10.1080/09644010802055634
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:46249093343
VL - 17
SP - 410
EP - 430
JO - Environmental Politics
JF - Environmental Politics
SN - 0964-4016
IS - 3
ER -