Are consensus democracies more environmentally effective?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Are consensus democracies more likely to enact environmentally friendly policies than majoritarian democracies? The relationship between democratic type and environmental effectiveness is more complex than previously assumed. What matters are not only institutions but also the nature of the policy issues, the types of institutions and veto players in the system. Four measures of effectiveness emerged from the data: mundane environmentalism; environmental taxation; conservation; and nuclear energy production. Environmental effectiveness in democratic systems differs depending upon which measure of effectiveness is examined and whether or not one looks at representational or organisational aspects of democracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)410-430
Number of pages21
JournalEnvironmental Politics
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

democracy
environmentalism
energy production
nuclear energy
taxation
conservation
policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Are consensus democracies more environmentally effective? / Poloni-Staudinger, Lori.

In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 17, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 410-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5c78bf9e85fe4966a9289a59130f8057,
title = "Are consensus democracies more environmentally effective?",
abstract = "Are consensus democracies more likely to enact environmentally friendly policies than majoritarian democracies? The relationship between democratic type and environmental effectiveness is more complex than previously assumed. What matters are not only institutions but also the nature of the policy issues, the types of institutions and veto players in the system. Four measures of effectiveness emerged from the data: mundane environmentalism; environmental taxation; conservation; and nuclear energy production. Environmental effectiveness in democratic systems differs depending upon which measure of effectiveness is examined and whether or not one looks at representational or organisational aspects of democracy.",
author = "Lori Poloni-Staudinger",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/09644010802055634",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "410--430",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are consensus democracies more environmentally effective?

AU - Poloni-Staudinger, Lori

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Are consensus democracies more likely to enact environmentally friendly policies than majoritarian democracies? The relationship between democratic type and environmental effectiveness is more complex than previously assumed. What matters are not only institutions but also the nature of the policy issues, the types of institutions and veto players in the system. Four measures of effectiveness emerged from the data: mundane environmentalism; environmental taxation; conservation; and nuclear energy production. Environmental effectiveness in democratic systems differs depending upon which measure of effectiveness is examined and whether or not one looks at representational or organisational aspects of democracy.

AB - Are consensus democracies more likely to enact environmentally friendly policies than majoritarian democracies? The relationship between democratic type and environmental effectiveness is more complex than previously assumed. What matters are not only institutions but also the nature of the policy issues, the types of institutions and veto players in the system. Four measures of effectiveness emerged from the data: mundane environmentalism; environmental taxation; conservation; and nuclear energy production. Environmental effectiveness in democratic systems differs depending upon which measure of effectiveness is examined and whether or not one looks at representational or organisational aspects of democracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46249093343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46249093343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09644010802055634

DO - 10.1080/09644010802055634

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:46249093343

VL - 17

SP - 410

EP - 430

JO - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

IS - 3

ER -