Applying the kriging method to predicting irradiance variability at a potential PV power plant

Samuel H. Monger, Eric R. Morgan, Ana R. Dyreson, Tom L Acker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One-second irradiance data from forty-five sensors spaced over a one-mile square section of land were analyzed to characterize the short-term (1-s to 1-min) variability of the solar resource in Northern Arizona. The geostatistical interpolation model known as kriging was applied to our data set to better understand the method's strengths and weaknesses in accurately predicting the variations in the irradiance over this relatively small section of land. Of particular interest was to investigate the ability of the kriging method to show the variation in solar irradiance over the section of land as compared to that measured by the sensors. When using data from all the sensors as input to the prediction method, kriging performed very well compared to the sensors. However, because it is unlikely to have a large number of sensors to characterize the variability at a prospective solar site, it was also of interest to investigate how many sensors are required as input to the kriging technique in order to generate a reliable prediction. Solar data from four characteristic periods (related to the four seasons) were analyzed, and different sensor configurations, consisting of subsets of the actual sensor array, were employed using the method to demonstrate the number of sensors required to correctly characterize the short-term irradiance variability at the site. Using four measurement stations as input to the kriging method was shown to reasonably represent the variability in the 1-s to 1-min timescales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7088
Pages (from-to)602-610
Number of pages9
JournalRenewable Energy
Volume86
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Power plants
Sensors
Sensor arrays
Interpolation

Keywords

  • Grid operation timescales
  • Kriging
  • Photovoltaics
  • Solar resource variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Applying the kriging method to predicting irradiance variability at a potential PV power plant. / Monger, Samuel H.; Morgan, Eric R.; Dyreson, Ana R.; Acker, Tom L.

In: Renewable Energy, Vol. 86, 7088, 01.02.2016, p. 602-610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Monger, Samuel H. ; Morgan, Eric R. ; Dyreson, Ana R. ; Acker, Tom L. / Applying the kriging method to predicting irradiance variability at a potential PV power plant. In: Renewable Energy. 2016 ; Vol. 86. pp. 602-610.
@article{d017a86e6d184526b1bbb909755bfc13,
title = "Applying the kriging method to predicting irradiance variability at a potential PV power plant",
abstract = "One-second irradiance data from forty-five sensors spaced over a one-mile square section of land were analyzed to characterize the short-term (1-s to 1-min) variability of the solar resource in Northern Arizona. The geostatistical interpolation model known as kriging was applied to our data set to better understand the method's strengths and weaknesses in accurately predicting the variations in the irradiance over this relatively small section of land. Of particular interest was to investigate the ability of the kriging method to show the variation in solar irradiance over the section of land as compared to that measured by the sensors. When using data from all the sensors as input to the prediction method, kriging performed very well compared to the sensors. However, because it is unlikely to have a large number of sensors to characterize the variability at a prospective solar site, it was also of interest to investigate how many sensors are required as input to the kriging technique in order to generate a reliable prediction. Solar data from four characteristic periods (related to the four seasons) were analyzed, and different sensor configurations, consisting of subsets of the actual sensor array, were employed using the method to demonstrate the number of sensors required to correctly characterize the short-term irradiance variability at the site. Using four measurement stations as input to the kriging method was shown to reasonably represent the variability in the 1-s to 1-min timescales.",
keywords = "Grid operation timescales, Kriging, Photovoltaics, Solar resource variability",
author = "Monger, {Samuel H.} and Morgan, {Eric R.} and Dyreson, {Ana R.} and Acker, {Tom L}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "602--610",
journal = "Renewable Energy",
issn = "0960-1481",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying the kriging method to predicting irradiance variability at a potential PV power plant

AU - Monger, Samuel H.

AU - Morgan, Eric R.

AU - Dyreson, Ana R.

AU - Acker, Tom L

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - One-second irradiance data from forty-five sensors spaced over a one-mile square section of land were analyzed to characterize the short-term (1-s to 1-min) variability of the solar resource in Northern Arizona. The geostatistical interpolation model known as kriging was applied to our data set to better understand the method's strengths and weaknesses in accurately predicting the variations in the irradiance over this relatively small section of land. Of particular interest was to investigate the ability of the kriging method to show the variation in solar irradiance over the section of land as compared to that measured by the sensors. When using data from all the sensors as input to the prediction method, kriging performed very well compared to the sensors. However, because it is unlikely to have a large number of sensors to characterize the variability at a prospective solar site, it was also of interest to investigate how many sensors are required as input to the kriging technique in order to generate a reliable prediction. Solar data from four characteristic periods (related to the four seasons) were analyzed, and different sensor configurations, consisting of subsets of the actual sensor array, were employed using the method to demonstrate the number of sensors required to correctly characterize the short-term irradiance variability at the site. Using four measurement stations as input to the kriging method was shown to reasonably represent the variability in the 1-s to 1-min timescales.

AB - One-second irradiance data from forty-five sensors spaced over a one-mile square section of land were analyzed to characterize the short-term (1-s to 1-min) variability of the solar resource in Northern Arizona. The geostatistical interpolation model known as kriging was applied to our data set to better understand the method's strengths and weaknesses in accurately predicting the variations in the irradiance over this relatively small section of land. Of particular interest was to investigate the ability of the kriging method to show the variation in solar irradiance over the section of land as compared to that measured by the sensors. When using data from all the sensors as input to the prediction method, kriging performed very well compared to the sensors. However, because it is unlikely to have a large number of sensors to characterize the variability at a prospective solar site, it was also of interest to investigate how many sensors are required as input to the kriging technique in order to generate a reliable prediction. Solar data from four characteristic periods (related to the four seasons) were analyzed, and different sensor configurations, consisting of subsets of the actual sensor array, were employed using the method to demonstrate the number of sensors required to correctly characterize the short-term irradiance variability at the site. Using four measurement stations as input to the kriging method was shown to reasonably represent the variability in the 1-s to 1-min timescales.

KW - Grid operation timescales

KW - Kriging

KW - Photovoltaics

KW - Solar resource variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941090377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941090377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.058

DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84941090377

VL - 86

SP - 602

EP - 610

JO - Renewable Energy

JF - Renewable Energy

SN - 0960-1481

M1 - 7088

ER -