Animal galloping and human hopping

An energetics and biomechanics laboratory exercise

Stan L Lindstedt, Patrick M. Mineo, Paul J. Schaeffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This laboratory exercise demonstrates fundamental principles of mammalian locomotion. It provides opportunities to interrogate aspects of locomotion from biomechanics to energetics to body size scaling. It has the added benefit of having results with robust signal to noise so that students will have success even if not "meticulous" in attention to detail. First, using respirometry, students measure the energetic cost of hopping at a "preferred" hop frequency. This is followed by hopping at an imposed frequency the O2 uptake and work done with each hop, students calculate mechanical efficiency. Lessons learned from this laboratory include 1) that the metabolic cost per hop at half of the preferred frequency is nearly double the cost at the preferred frequency; 2) that when a person is forced to hop at half of their preferred frequency, the mechanical efficiency is nearly that predicted for muscle but is much higher at the preferred frequency; 3) that the preferred hop frequency is strongly body size dependent; and 4) that the hop frequency of a human is nearly identical to the galloping frequency predicted for a quadruped of our size. Together, these exercises demonstrate that humans store and recover elastic recoil potential energy when hopping but that energetic savings are highly frequency dependent. This stride frequency is dependent on body size such that frequency is likely chosen to maximize this function. Finally, by requiring students to make quantitative solutions using appropriate units and dimensions of the physical variables, these exercises sharpen analytic and quantitative skills.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-383
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

Humulus
Biomechanical Phenomena
Exercise
Body Size
Students
Locomotion
Costs and Cost Analysis
Noise
Muscles

Keywords

  • Allometry
  • Eccentric contractions
  • Frequency
  • Locomotion
  • Metabolism
  • Respirometry
  • Scaling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Animal galloping and human hopping : An energetics and biomechanics laboratory exercise. / Lindstedt, Stan L; Mineo, Patrick M.; Schaeffer, Paul J.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.12.2013, p. 377-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1215bada82f4f338e4d805e3d8f7e4a,
title = "Animal galloping and human hopping: An energetics and biomechanics laboratory exercise",
abstract = "This laboratory exercise demonstrates fundamental principles of mammalian locomotion. It provides opportunities to interrogate aspects of locomotion from biomechanics to energetics to body size scaling. It has the added benefit of having results with robust signal to noise so that students will have success even if not {"}meticulous{"} in attention to detail. First, using respirometry, students measure the energetic cost of hopping at a {"}preferred{"} hop frequency. This is followed by hopping at an imposed frequency the O2 uptake and work done with each hop, students calculate mechanical efficiency. Lessons learned from this laboratory include 1) that the metabolic cost per hop at half of the preferred frequency is nearly double the cost at the preferred frequency; 2) that when a person is forced to hop at half of their preferred frequency, the mechanical efficiency is nearly that predicted for muscle but is much higher at the preferred frequency; 3) that the preferred hop frequency is strongly body size dependent; and 4) that the hop frequency of a human is nearly identical to the galloping frequency predicted for a quadruped of our size. Together, these exercises demonstrate that humans store and recover elastic recoil potential energy when hopping but that energetic savings are highly frequency dependent. This stride frequency is dependent on body size such that frequency is likely chosen to maximize this function. Finally, by requiring students to make quantitative solutions using appropriate units and dimensions of the physical variables, these exercises sharpen analytic and quantitative skills.",
keywords = "Allometry, Eccentric contractions, Frequency, Locomotion, Metabolism, Respirometry, Scaling",
author = "Lindstedt, {Stan L} and Mineo, {Patrick M.} and Schaeffer, {Paul J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/advan.00045.2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "377--383",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education",
issn = "1043-4046",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Animal galloping and human hopping

T2 - An energetics and biomechanics laboratory exercise

AU - Lindstedt, Stan L

AU - Mineo, Patrick M.

AU - Schaeffer, Paul J.

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - This laboratory exercise demonstrates fundamental principles of mammalian locomotion. It provides opportunities to interrogate aspects of locomotion from biomechanics to energetics to body size scaling. It has the added benefit of having results with robust signal to noise so that students will have success even if not "meticulous" in attention to detail. First, using respirometry, students measure the energetic cost of hopping at a "preferred" hop frequency. This is followed by hopping at an imposed frequency the O2 uptake and work done with each hop, students calculate mechanical efficiency. Lessons learned from this laboratory include 1) that the metabolic cost per hop at half of the preferred frequency is nearly double the cost at the preferred frequency; 2) that when a person is forced to hop at half of their preferred frequency, the mechanical efficiency is nearly that predicted for muscle but is much higher at the preferred frequency; 3) that the preferred hop frequency is strongly body size dependent; and 4) that the hop frequency of a human is nearly identical to the galloping frequency predicted for a quadruped of our size. Together, these exercises demonstrate that humans store and recover elastic recoil potential energy when hopping but that energetic savings are highly frequency dependent. This stride frequency is dependent on body size such that frequency is likely chosen to maximize this function. Finally, by requiring students to make quantitative solutions using appropriate units and dimensions of the physical variables, these exercises sharpen analytic and quantitative skills.

AB - This laboratory exercise demonstrates fundamental principles of mammalian locomotion. It provides opportunities to interrogate aspects of locomotion from biomechanics to energetics to body size scaling. It has the added benefit of having results with robust signal to noise so that students will have success even if not "meticulous" in attention to detail. First, using respirometry, students measure the energetic cost of hopping at a "preferred" hop frequency. This is followed by hopping at an imposed frequency the O2 uptake and work done with each hop, students calculate mechanical efficiency. Lessons learned from this laboratory include 1) that the metabolic cost per hop at half of the preferred frequency is nearly double the cost at the preferred frequency; 2) that when a person is forced to hop at half of their preferred frequency, the mechanical efficiency is nearly that predicted for muscle but is much higher at the preferred frequency; 3) that the preferred hop frequency is strongly body size dependent; and 4) that the hop frequency of a human is nearly identical to the galloping frequency predicted for a quadruped of our size. Together, these exercises demonstrate that humans store and recover elastic recoil potential energy when hopping but that energetic savings are highly frequency dependent. This stride frequency is dependent on body size such that frequency is likely chosen to maximize this function. Finally, by requiring students to make quantitative solutions using appropriate units and dimensions of the physical variables, these exercises sharpen analytic and quantitative skills.

KW - Allometry

KW - Eccentric contractions

KW - Frequency

KW - Locomotion

KW - Metabolism

KW - Respirometry

KW - Scaling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890870400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890870400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/advan.00045.2013

DO - 10.1152/advan.00045.2013

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 377

EP - 383

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

SN - 1043-4046

IS - 4

ER -