Analytic hierarchy process application for multiple purpose forest resources management budget allocation in Durango, Mexico

Aregai Tecle, Gustavo Perez Verdin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A very important aspect of natural resources management is determining optimal budget allocation to satisfy the needs and aspirations of multiple stakeholders. This is especially the case in developing countries like Mexico where budgetary funds are in short supply. There has been an increasing debate in Durango, Mexico, for example, about determining the most efficient way of allocating a budget for multi-purpose forest management. The debate has been triggered by a growing number of interests and stakeholders, which in addition to optimal timber production, have the desire to improve environmental conditions, water resource development, range and other non-timber resources production, and to provide better amenity values and expanded recreational opportunities. CONAFOR (COmisión NAcionale FORestal), the Mexican agency in charge of allocating funds to promote sustainable forest resources development, has been implementing four national programs: developments of forest resources, tree plantations, non-timber products, and water resources. In addition to these programs, the forest resources management decision-making process involves four interest groups and six management objectives independently connected in a hierarchical framework. Accordingly, the most suitable multi-objective/multi-criterion decision-making (MODM/MCDM) technique for optimal allocation of scarce budgetary funds among the four natural resources development programs is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The two programs that receive the most funds are forest resources development and water resources/ environmental services development. In this way, the AHP can be used to optimally distribute scarce financial resources among competing programs to improve regional economic development and better satisfy the needs of various interest groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-63
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of the Analytic Hierachy Process
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Forest resources
Mexico
Resource management
Budget allocation
Analytic hierarchy process
Water resources
Interest groups
Forest management
Regional economic development
Developing countries
Financial resources
Multiple stakeholders
Decision-making process
Timber production
Plantation
Amenity value
Optimal allocation
Management decision-making
Stakeholders
Natural resource management

Keywords

  • CONAFOR
  • Ejido
  • Forest budget allocation
  • Mexican community forestry
  • Multi-objective forest management
  • Utility model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{d66c02b8f1c34f41a2d52278f7fbd003,
title = "Analytic hierarchy process application for multiple purpose forest resources management budget allocation in Durango, Mexico",
abstract = "A very important aspect of natural resources management is determining optimal budget allocation to satisfy the needs and aspirations of multiple stakeholders. This is especially the case in developing countries like Mexico where budgetary funds are in short supply. There has been an increasing debate in Durango, Mexico, for example, about determining the most efficient way of allocating a budget for multi-purpose forest management. The debate has been triggered by a growing number of interests and stakeholders, which in addition to optimal timber production, have the desire to improve environmental conditions, water resource development, range and other non-timber resources production, and to provide better amenity values and expanded recreational opportunities. CONAFOR (COmisi{\'o}n NAcionale FORestal), the Mexican agency in charge of allocating funds to promote sustainable forest resources development, has been implementing four national programs: developments of forest resources, tree plantations, non-timber products, and water resources. In addition to these programs, the forest resources management decision-making process involves four interest groups and six management objectives independently connected in a hierarchical framework. Accordingly, the most suitable multi-objective/multi-criterion decision-making (MODM/MCDM) technique for optimal allocation of scarce budgetary funds among the four natural resources development programs is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The two programs that receive the most funds are forest resources development and water resources/ environmental services development. In this way, the AHP can be used to optimally distribute scarce financial resources among competing programs to improve regional economic development and better satisfy the needs of various interest groups.",
keywords = "CONAFOR, Ejido, Forest budget allocation, Mexican community forestry, Multi-objective forest management, Utility model",
author = "Aregai Tecle and Verdin, {Gustavo Perez}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.13033/ijahp.v10i1.422",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "39--63",
journal = "International Journal of the Analytic Hierachy Process",
issn = "1936-6744",
publisher = "Creative Decisions Foundation",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analytic hierarchy process application for multiple purpose forest resources management budget allocation in Durango, Mexico

AU - Tecle, Aregai

AU - Verdin, Gustavo Perez

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - A very important aspect of natural resources management is determining optimal budget allocation to satisfy the needs and aspirations of multiple stakeholders. This is especially the case in developing countries like Mexico where budgetary funds are in short supply. There has been an increasing debate in Durango, Mexico, for example, about determining the most efficient way of allocating a budget for multi-purpose forest management. The debate has been triggered by a growing number of interests and stakeholders, which in addition to optimal timber production, have the desire to improve environmental conditions, water resource development, range and other non-timber resources production, and to provide better amenity values and expanded recreational opportunities. CONAFOR (COmisión NAcionale FORestal), the Mexican agency in charge of allocating funds to promote sustainable forest resources development, has been implementing four national programs: developments of forest resources, tree plantations, non-timber products, and water resources. In addition to these programs, the forest resources management decision-making process involves four interest groups and six management objectives independently connected in a hierarchical framework. Accordingly, the most suitable multi-objective/multi-criterion decision-making (MODM/MCDM) technique for optimal allocation of scarce budgetary funds among the four natural resources development programs is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The two programs that receive the most funds are forest resources development and water resources/ environmental services development. In this way, the AHP can be used to optimally distribute scarce financial resources among competing programs to improve regional economic development and better satisfy the needs of various interest groups.

AB - A very important aspect of natural resources management is determining optimal budget allocation to satisfy the needs and aspirations of multiple stakeholders. This is especially the case in developing countries like Mexico where budgetary funds are in short supply. There has been an increasing debate in Durango, Mexico, for example, about determining the most efficient way of allocating a budget for multi-purpose forest management. The debate has been triggered by a growing number of interests and stakeholders, which in addition to optimal timber production, have the desire to improve environmental conditions, water resource development, range and other non-timber resources production, and to provide better amenity values and expanded recreational opportunities. CONAFOR (COmisión NAcionale FORestal), the Mexican agency in charge of allocating funds to promote sustainable forest resources development, has been implementing four national programs: developments of forest resources, tree plantations, non-timber products, and water resources. In addition to these programs, the forest resources management decision-making process involves four interest groups and six management objectives independently connected in a hierarchical framework. Accordingly, the most suitable multi-objective/multi-criterion decision-making (MODM/MCDM) technique for optimal allocation of scarce budgetary funds among the four natural resources development programs is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The two programs that receive the most funds are forest resources development and water resources/ environmental services development. In this way, the AHP can be used to optimally distribute scarce financial resources among competing programs to improve regional economic development and better satisfy the needs of various interest groups.

KW - CONAFOR

KW - Ejido

KW - Forest budget allocation

KW - Mexican community forestry

KW - Multi-objective forest management

KW - Utility model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050373725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050373725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13033/ijahp.v10i1.422

DO - 10.13033/ijahp.v10i1.422

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 39

EP - 63

JO - International Journal of the Analytic Hierachy Process

T2 - International Journal of the Analytic Hierachy Process

JF - International Journal of the Analytic Hierachy Process

SN - 1936-6744

IS - 1

ER -