Analysis of specific leaf area and photosynthesis of two inbred lines of Plantago major differing in relative growth rate

Paul Dijkstra, HANS LAMBERS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two inbred lines of Plantago major L., differing in relative growth rate (RGR), were studied in order to elucidate physiological factors responsible for this difference. The slow growing inbred line of P. major ssp. major L. (line W9) had a lower specific leaf area (SLA) compared with that of the fast growing P. major ssp. pleiosperma Pilger (line A4). Photosynthetic activity per unit leaf area was higher than that of A4, but expressed per unit leaf dry weight W9 exhibited a lower activity than A4. Photosynthetic capacity (per unit leaf dry weight or nitrogen) was identical for both lines. The amount of chlorophyll a per unit dry weight or leaf area was higher for line W9. Differences in the chemical composition of the leaf dry weight of the two lines did not explain the lower SLA or lower photosynthetic activity per unit leaf dry weight of the slow growing line. The lower SLA of W9 was mainly caused by the lower water content per unit dry weight. A higher amount of cell wall material per unit leaf dry weight was found. We conclude that the lower SLA of W9 resulted in a greater shading within the leaf, a lower light absorption and lower photosynthetic rate per unit leaf dry weight. Consequently, this resulted in a lower RGR. The significance of these characters for growth under trampling and soil compaction is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-290
Number of pages8
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume113
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Plantago major
Plantago
Photosynthesis
inbred lines
leaf area
photosynthesis
Weights and Measures
Growth
leaves
soil compaction
Cell Wall
shade
Nitrogen
Soil
chemical composition
cell walls
water content
chlorophyll
Water

Keywords

  • Chemical composition
  • genetic variation
  • photosynthetic capacity
  • Plantago major
  • relative growth rate
  • soil compaction
  • specific leaf area
  • trampling resistance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Medicine(all)
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Analysis of specific leaf area and photosynthesis of two inbred lines of Plantago major differing in relative growth rate. / Dijkstra, Paul; LAMBERS, HANS.

In: New Phytologist, Vol. 113, No. 3, 1989, p. 283-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{213e464f32c84bdab2d488814d18c38c,
title = "Analysis of specific leaf area and photosynthesis of two inbred lines of Plantago major differing in relative growth rate",
abstract = "Two inbred lines of Plantago major L., differing in relative growth rate (RGR), were studied in order to elucidate physiological factors responsible for this difference. The slow growing inbred line of P. major ssp. major L. (line W9) had a lower specific leaf area (SLA) compared with that of the fast growing P. major ssp. pleiosperma Pilger (line A4). Photosynthetic activity per unit leaf area was higher than that of A4, but expressed per unit leaf dry weight W9 exhibited a lower activity than A4. Photosynthetic capacity (per unit leaf dry weight or nitrogen) was identical for both lines. The amount of chlorophyll a per unit dry weight or leaf area was higher for line W9. Differences in the chemical composition of the leaf dry weight of the two lines did not explain the lower SLA or lower photosynthetic activity per unit leaf dry weight of the slow growing line. The lower SLA of W9 was mainly caused by the lower water content per unit dry weight. A higher amount of cell wall material per unit leaf dry weight was found. We conclude that the lower SLA of W9 resulted in a greater shading within the leaf, a lower light absorption and lower photosynthetic rate per unit leaf dry weight. Consequently, this resulted in a lower RGR. The significance of these characters for growth under trampling and soil compaction is discussed.",
keywords = "Chemical composition, genetic variation, photosynthetic capacity, Plantago major, relative growth rate, soil compaction, specific leaf area, trampling resistance",
author = "Paul Dijkstra and HANS LAMBERS",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-8137.1989.tb02405.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "283--290",
journal = "New Phytologist",
issn = "0028-646X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of specific leaf area and photosynthesis of two inbred lines of Plantago major differing in relative growth rate

AU - Dijkstra, Paul

AU - LAMBERS, HANS

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Two inbred lines of Plantago major L., differing in relative growth rate (RGR), were studied in order to elucidate physiological factors responsible for this difference. The slow growing inbred line of P. major ssp. major L. (line W9) had a lower specific leaf area (SLA) compared with that of the fast growing P. major ssp. pleiosperma Pilger (line A4). Photosynthetic activity per unit leaf area was higher than that of A4, but expressed per unit leaf dry weight W9 exhibited a lower activity than A4. Photosynthetic capacity (per unit leaf dry weight or nitrogen) was identical for both lines. The amount of chlorophyll a per unit dry weight or leaf area was higher for line W9. Differences in the chemical composition of the leaf dry weight of the two lines did not explain the lower SLA or lower photosynthetic activity per unit leaf dry weight of the slow growing line. The lower SLA of W9 was mainly caused by the lower water content per unit dry weight. A higher amount of cell wall material per unit leaf dry weight was found. We conclude that the lower SLA of W9 resulted in a greater shading within the leaf, a lower light absorption and lower photosynthetic rate per unit leaf dry weight. Consequently, this resulted in a lower RGR. The significance of these characters for growth under trampling and soil compaction is discussed.

AB - Two inbred lines of Plantago major L., differing in relative growth rate (RGR), were studied in order to elucidate physiological factors responsible for this difference. The slow growing inbred line of P. major ssp. major L. (line W9) had a lower specific leaf area (SLA) compared with that of the fast growing P. major ssp. pleiosperma Pilger (line A4). Photosynthetic activity per unit leaf area was higher than that of A4, but expressed per unit leaf dry weight W9 exhibited a lower activity than A4. Photosynthetic capacity (per unit leaf dry weight or nitrogen) was identical for both lines. The amount of chlorophyll a per unit dry weight or leaf area was higher for line W9. Differences in the chemical composition of the leaf dry weight of the two lines did not explain the lower SLA or lower photosynthetic activity per unit leaf dry weight of the slow growing line. The lower SLA of W9 was mainly caused by the lower water content per unit dry weight. A higher amount of cell wall material per unit leaf dry weight was found. We conclude that the lower SLA of W9 resulted in a greater shading within the leaf, a lower light absorption and lower photosynthetic rate per unit leaf dry weight. Consequently, this resulted in a lower RGR. The significance of these characters for growth under trampling and soil compaction is discussed.

KW - Chemical composition

KW - genetic variation

KW - photosynthetic capacity

KW - Plantago major

KW - relative growth rate

KW - soil compaction

KW - specific leaf area

KW - trampling resistance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987014770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987014770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1989.tb02405.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1989.tb02405.x

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 283

EP - 290

JO - New Phytologist

JF - New Phytologist

SN - 0028-646X

IS - 3

ER -