An Exploratory Study of Learning Behaviors and Their Relationship to Gains in Linguistic and Communicative Competence

ROBERT L. POLITZER, Mary E McGroarty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

160 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A questionnaire relating to presumed good learning behaviors was administered to 37 students enrolled in an eight‐week intensive course in English as a second language in preparation for graduate study in the United States. The answers to the self‐report questionnaire were classified according to the students' cultural background (Asian versus Hispanic) and field of specialization (professional engineering/science versus social science/humanities) and related to gains on four English language proficiency measures: linguistic competence; auditory comprehension; overall oral proficiency; and communicative competence, conceptualized here primarily as the ability to convey information. Analyses indicated that while the Asian subjects engaged in fewer of the assumed “good” learning behaviors than the Hispanics, they tended to make greater gains in linguistic competence and communicative competence. On the other hand, the Hispanic students made more progress in overall oral proficiency and in auditory comprehension. Examination of the relationships between specific behaviors and second language learning gains revealed an interesting split: Some behaviors were associated with conscious learning, while others were related to acquisition and gains in general communicative competence. Results indicate that caution in prescribing good learning behaviors is warranted. Considerable further research is needed to explain which behaviors are helpful for learners at various levels and to relate these behaviors to current second language learning theories. 1985 TESOL International Association

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-123
Number of pages21
JournalTESOL Quarterly
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

linguistic competence
communicative competence
learning behavior
comprehension
language theory
engineering science
questionnaire
student
learning theory
language
specialization
learning
English language
social science
graduate
examination
Communicative Competence
Linguistic Competence
ability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

An Exploratory Study of Learning Behaviors and Their Relationship to Gains in Linguistic and Communicative Competence. / POLITZER, ROBERT L.; McGroarty, Mary E.

In: TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1985, p. 103-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93f4d8a4db3a4ebb96bf85b9c7c90b5f,
title = "An Exploratory Study of Learning Behaviors and Their Relationship to Gains in Linguistic and Communicative Competence",
abstract = "A questionnaire relating to presumed good learning behaviors was administered to 37 students enrolled in an eight‐week intensive course in English as a second language in preparation for graduate study in the United States. The answers to the self‐report questionnaire were classified according to the students' cultural background (Asian versus Hispanic) and field of specialization (professional engineering/science versus social science/humanities) and related to gains on four English language proficiency measures: linguistic competence; auditory comprehension; overall oral proficiency; and communicative competence, conceptualized here primarily as the ability to convey information. Analyses indicated that while the Asian subjects engaged in fewer of the assumed “good” learning behaviors than the Hispanics, they tended to make greater gains in linguistic competence and communicative competence. On the other hand, the Hispanic students made more progress in overall oral proficiency and in auditory comprehension. Examination of the relationships between specific behaviors and second language learning gains revealed an interesting split: Some behaviors were associated with conscious learning, while others were related to acquisition and gains in general communicative competence. Results indicate that caution in prescribing good learning behaviors is warranted. Considerable further research is needed to explain which behaviors are helpful for learners at various levels and to relate these behaviors to current second language learning theories. 1985 TESOL International Association",
author = "POLITZER, {ROBERT L.} and McGroarty, {Mary E}",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.2307/3586774",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "103--123",
journal = "TESOL Quarterly",
issn = "0039-8322",
publisher = "TESOL",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Exploratory Study of Learning Behaviors and Their Relationship to Gains in Linguistic and Communicative Competence

AU - POLITZER, ROBERT L.

AU - McGroarty, Mary E

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - A questionnaire relating to presumed good learning behaviors was administered to 37 students enrolled in an eight‐week intensive course in English as a second language in preparation for graduate study in the United States. The answers to the self‐report questionnaire were classified according to the students' cultural background (Asian versus Hispanic) and field of specialization (professional engineering/science versus social science/humanities) and related to gains on four English language proficiency measures: linguistic competence; auditory comprehension; overall oral proficiency; and communicative competence, conceptualized here primarily as the ability to convey information. Analyses indicated that while the Asian subjects engaged in fewer of the assumed “good” learning behaviors than the Hispanics, they tended to make greater gains in linguistic competence and communicative competence. On the other hand, the Hispanic students made more progress in overall oral proficiency and in auditory comprehension. Examination of the relationships between specific behaviors and second language learning gains revealed an interesting split: Some behaviors were associated with conscious learning, while others were related to acquisition and gains in general communicative competence. Results indicate that caution in prescribing good learning behaviors is warranted. Considerable further research is needed to explain which behaviors are helpful for learners at various levels and to relate these behaviors to current second language learning theories. 1985 TESOL International Association

AB - A questionnaire relating to presumed good learning behaviors was administered to 37 students enrolled in an eight‐week intensive course in English as a second language in preparation for graduate study in the United States. The answers to the self‐report questionnaire were classified according to the students' cultural background (Asian versus Hispanic) and field of specialization (professional engineering/science versus social science/humanities) and related to gains on four English language proficiency measures: linguistic competence; auditory comprehension; overall oral proficiency; and communicative competence, conceptualized here primarily as the ability to convey information. Analyses indicated that while the Asian subjects engaged in fewer of the assumed “good” learning behaviors than the Hispanics, they tended to make greater gains in linguistic competence and communicative competence. On the other hand, the Hispanic students made more progress in overall oral proficiency and in auditory comprehension. Examination of the relationships between specific behaviors and second language learning gains revealed an interesting split: Some behaviors were associated with conscious learning, while others were related to acquisition and gains in general communicative competence. Results indicate that caution in prescribing good learning behaviors is warranted. Considerable further research is needed to explain which behaviors are helpful for learners at various levels and to relate these behaviors to current second language learning theories. 1985 TESOL International Association

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981685258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981685258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/3586774

DO - 10.2307/3586774

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 103

EP - 123

JO - TESOL Quarterly

JF - TESOL Quarterly

SN - 0039-8322

IS - 1

ER -