An examination of pace’s model of student development and college impress

Corinna A. Ethington, Robert Horn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pace (1979b) delineates a model for the study of student development and college impress. That model was the basis for his development of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ) and the Community College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CCSEQ). His perspective is similar to Astin (1970 1984) and Tinto (1975 1986) in that each posit student time and effort to be the key constructs associated with outcomes of the college experience. These authors also postulate that the extent to which students’ exert their time and efforts in the educational opportunities and activities provided by institutions directly impacts their growth and development. This study tests Pace’s model using a sample of community college students in 40 community colleges across the United States with the student outcome being perceived gains in personal and social development. Results strongly support Pace’s proposition relative to student effort in that effort is the most important determinant of perceived gains. Recommendations suggest that the best application of the model would involve merging institutional data with CCSEQ data. This would provide a more rich and complete set of measures of background and status in college.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-215
Number of pages17
JournalCommunity College Journal of Research and Practice
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

examination
student
community
questionnaire
experience
educational activities
educational opportunity
social development
determinants
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

An examination of pace’s model of student development and college impress. / Ethington, Corinna A.; Horn, Robert.

In: Community College Journal of Research and Practice, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2007, p. 199-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc16aa68fce841f2a8efabdd2c734fb9,
title = "An examination of pace’s model of student development and college impress",
abstract = "Pace (1979b) delineates a model for the study of student development and college impress. That model was the basis for his development of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ) and the Community College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CCSEQ). His perspective is similar to Astin (1970 1984) and Tinto (1975 1986) in that each posit student time and effort to be the key constructs associated with outcomes of the college experience. These authors also postulate that the extent to which students’ exert their time and efforts in the educational opportunities and activities provided by institutions directly impacts their growth and development. This study tests Pace’s model using a sample of community college students in 40 community colleges across the United States with the student outcome being perceived gains in personal and social development. Results strongly support Pace’s proposition relative to student effort in that effort is the most important determinant of perceived gains. Recommendations suggest that the best application of the model would involve merging institutional data with CCSEQ data. This would provide a more rich and complete set of measures of background and status in college.",
author = "Ethington, {Corinna A.} and Robert Horn",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1080/10668920600857222",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "199--215",
journal = "Community College Journal of Research and Practice",
issn = "1066-8926",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An examination of pace’s model of student development and college impress

AU - Ethington, Corinna A.

AU - Horn, Robert

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Pace (1979b) delineates a model for the study of student development and college impress. That model was the basis for his development of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ) and the Community College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CCSEQ). His perspective is similar to Astin (1970 1984) and Tinto (1975 1986) in that each posit student time and effort to be the key constructs associated with outcomes of the college experience. These authors also postulate that the extent to which students’ exert their time and efforts in the educational opportunities and activities provided by institutions directly impacts their growth and development. This study tests Pace’s model using a sample of community college students in 40 community colleges across the United States with the student outcome being perceived gains in personal and social development. Results strongly support Pace’s proposition relative to student effort in that effort is the most important determinant of perceived gains. Recommendations suggest that the best application of the model would involve merging institutional data with CCSEQ data. This would provide a more rich and complete set of measures of background and status in college.

AB - Pace (1979b) delineates a model for the study of student development and college impress. That model was the basis for his development of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ) and the Community College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CCSEQ). His perspective is similar to Astin (1970 1984) and Tinto (1975 1986) in that each posit student time and effort to be the key constructs associated with outcomes of the college experience. These authors also postulate that the extent to which students’ exert their time and efforts in the educational opportunities and activities provided by institutions directly impacts their growth and development. This study tests Pace’s model using a sample of community college students in 40 community colleges across the United States with the student outcome being perceived gains in personal and social development. Results strongly support Pace’s proposition relative to student effort in that effort is the most important determinant of perceived gains. Recommendations suggest that the best application of the model would involve merging institutional data with CCSEQ data. This would provide a more rich and complete set of measures of background and status in college.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011438654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011438654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10668920600857222

DO - 10.1080/10668920600857222

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 199

EP - 215

JO - Community College Journal of Research and Practice

JF - Community College Journal of Research and Practice

SN - 1066-8926

IS - 3

ER -