Addressing barriers to improve biocrust colonization and establishment in dryland restoration

Anita Antoninka, Matthew A. Bowker, Nichole N. Barger, Jayne Belnap, Ana Giraldo-Silva, Sasha C. Reed, Ferran Garcia-Pichel, Michael C. Duniway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Methods to reduce soil loss and associated loss of ecosystem functions due to land degradation are of particular importance in dryland ecosystems. Biocrusts are communities of cyanobacteria, lichens, and bryophytes that are vulnerable to soil disturbance, but provide vital ecosystem functions when present. Biocrusts stabilize soil, improve hydrologic function, and increase nutrient and carbon inputs. Methods to reestablish biocrust rapidly, when lost from ecosystems, have the potential to restore important dryland ecosystem functions and thereby increase probability of successful rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to identify habitat ameliorations to enhance the success of biocrust inoculation by: (1) reducing physiological stress on biocrusts and increasing resource availability (using shade, soil surface roughening, and watering), and (2) stabilizing mobile soils (using straw borders, three soil tackifiers [soil stabilizers], and a combination of shade, water, roughening, and tackifier). In the Great Basin Desert on the Utah Test and Training Range near Salt Lake City, we applied field-harvested biocrust material to experimental plots on coarse- and fine-textured soils with the top 2 cm of soil and biocrust removed. Habitat ameliorations were applied with and without biocrust addition. Shade provision increased biocrust cover 50% over controls. Biocrust cover and soil stability were 65% lower in straw border plots relative to controls. Soil tackifiers, alone and in combination with resource augmentation and stress reduction, did not improve cover and stabilization over inoculated controls. We found variability in recovery by time and between soil types. These results suggest plausible strategies to improve success of biocrust inoculation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalRestoration Ecology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

arid lands
colonization
soil
ecosystem function
ecosystems
shade
straw
inoculation
remediation
restoration
fine-textured soils
coarse-textured soils
land degradation
ecosystem
bryophyte
habitat
resource availability
habitats
lichen
topsoil

Keywords

  • biocrust
  • biocrust rehabilitation
  • dryland restoration
  • Great Basin
  • habitat amelioration
  • soil stabilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Antoninka, A., Bowker, M. A., Barger, N. N., Belnap, J., Giraldo-Silva, A., Reed, S. C., ... Duniway, M. C. (Accepted/In press). Addressing barriers to improve biocrust colonization and establishment in dryland restoration. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13052

Addressing barriers to improve biocrust colonization and establishment in dryland restoration. / Antoninka, Anita; Bowker, Matthew A.; Barger, Nichole N.; Belnap, Jayne; Giraldo-Silva, Ana; Reed, Sasha C.; Garcia-Pichel, Ferran; Duniway, Michael C.

In: Restoration Ecology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Antoninka, A, Bowker, MA, Barger, NN, Belnap, J, Giraldo-Silva, A, Reed, SC, Garcia-Pichel, F & Duniway, MC 2019, 'Addressing barriers to improve biocrust colonization and establishment in dryland restoration', Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13052
Antoninka, Anita ; Bowker, Matthew A. ; Barger, Nichole N. ; Belnap, Jayne ; Giraldo-Silva, Ana ; Reed, Sasha C. ; Garcia-Pichel, Ferran ; Duniway, Michael C. / Addressing barriers to improve biocrust colonization and establishment in dryland restoration. In: Restoration Ecology. 2019.
@article{c38d16973d5246b781f02c9db7076ef9,
title = "Addressing barriers to improve biocrust colonization and establishment in dryland restoration",
abstract = "Methods to reduce soil loss and associated loss of ecosystem functions due to land degradation are of particular importance in dryland ecosystems. Biocrusts are communities of cyanobacteria, lichens, and bryophytes that are vulnerable to soil disturbance, but provide vital ecosystem functions when present. Biocrusts stabilize soil, improve hydrologic function, and increase nutrient and carbon inputs. Methods to reestablish biocrust rapidly, when lost from ecosystems, have the potential to restore important dryland ecosystem functions and thereby increase probability of successful rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to identify habitat ameliorations to enhance the success of biocrust inoculation by: (1) reducing physiological stress on biocrusts and increasing resource availability (using shade, soil surface roughening, and watering), and (2) stabilizing mobile soils (using straw borders, three soil tackifiers [soil stabilizers], and a combination of shade, water, roughening, and tackifier). In the Great Basin Desert on the Utah Test and Training Range near Salt Lake City, we applied field-harvested biocrust material to experimental plots on coarse- and fine-textured soils with the top 2 cm of soil and biocrust removed. Habitat ameliorations were applied with and without biocrust addition. Shade provision increased biocrust cover 50{\%} over controls. Biocrust cover and soil stability were 65{\%} lower in straw border plots relative to controls. Soil tackifiers, alone and in combination with resource augmentation and stress reduction, did not improve cover and stabilization over inoculated controls. We found variability in recovery by time and between soil types. These results suggest plausible strategies to improve success of biocrust inoculation.",
keywords = "biocrust, biocrust rehabilitation, dryland restoration, Great Basin, habitat amelioration, soil stabilization",
author = "Anita Antoninka and Bowker, {Matthew A.} and Barger, {Nichole N.} and Jayne Belnap and Ana Giraldo-Silva and Reed, {Sasha C.} and Ferran Garcia-Pichel and Duniway, {Michael C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/rec.13052",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing barriers to improve biocrust colonization and establishment in dryland restoration

AU - Antoninka, Anita

AU - Bowker, Matthew A.

AU - Barger, Nichole N.

AU - Belnap, Jayne

AU - Giraldo-Silva, Ana

AU - Reed, Sasha C.

AU - Garcia-Pichel, Ferran

AU - Duniway, Michael C.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Methods to reduce soil loss and associated loss of ecosystem functions due to land degradation are of particular importance in dryland ecosystems. Biocrusts are communities of cyanobacteria, lichens, and bryophytes that are vulnerable to soil disturbance, but provide vital ecosystem functions when present. Biocrusts stabilize soil, improve hydrologic function, and increase nutrient and carbon inputs. Methods to reestablish biocrust rapidly, when lost from ecosystems, have the potential to restore important dryland ecosystem functions and thereby increase probability of successful rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to identify habitat ameliorations to enhance the success of biocrust inoculation by: (1) reducing physiological stress on biocrusts and increasing resource availability (using shade, soil surface roughening, and watering), and (2) stabilizing mobile soils (using straw borders, three soil tackifiers [soil stabilizers], and a combination of shade, water, roughening, and tackifier). In the Great Basin Desert on the Utah Test and Training Range near Salt Lake City, we applied field-harvested biocrust material to experimental plots on coarse- and fine-textured soils with the top 2 cm of soil and biocrust removed. Habitat ameliorations were applied with and without biocrust addition. Shade provision increased biocrust cover 50% over controls. Biocrust cover and soil stability were 65% lower in straw border plots relative to controls. Soil tackifiers, alone and in combination with resource augmentation and stress reduction, did not improve cover and stabilization over inoculated controls. We found variability in recovery by time and between soil types. These results suggest plausible strategies to improve success of biocrust inoculation.

AB - Methods to reduce soil loss and associated loss of ecosystem functions due to land degradation are of particular importance in dryland ecosystems. Biocrusts are communities of cyanobacteria, lichens, and bryophytes that are vulnerable to soil disturbance, but provide vital ecosystem functions when present. Biocrusts stabilize soil, improve hydrologic function, and increase nutrient and carbon inputs. Methods to reestablish biocrust rapidly, when lost from ecosystems, have the potential to restore important dryland ecosystem functions and thereby increase probability of successful rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to identify habitat ameliorations to enhance the success of biocrust inoculation by: (1) reducing physiological stress on biocrusts and increasing resource availability (using shade, soil surface roughening, and watering), and (2) stabilizing mobile soils (using straw borders, three soil tackifiers [soil stabilizers], and a combination of shade, water, roughening, and tackifier). In the Great Basin Desert on the Utah Test and Training Range near Salt Lake City, we applied field-harvested biocrust material to experimental plots on coarse- and fine-textured soils with the top 2 cm of soil and biocrust removed. Habitat ameliorations were applied with and without biocrust addition. Shade provision increased biocrust cover 50% over controls. Biocrust cover and soil stability were 65% lower in straw border plots relative to controls. Soil tackifiers, alone and in combination with resource augmentation and stress reduction, did not improve cover and stabilization over inoculated controls. We found variability in recovery by time and between soil types. These results suggest plausible strategies to improve success of biocrust inoculation.

KW - biocrust

KW - biocrust rehabilitation

KW - dryland restoration

KW - Great Basin

KW - habitat amelioration

KW - soil stabilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074854002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074854002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/rec.13052

DO - 10.1111/rec.13052

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074854002

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

ER -