A systematic review of brief functional analysis methodology with typically developing children

Andrew W Gardner, Trina D. Spencer, Eric W. Boelter, Melanie Dubard, Heather K. Jennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Brief functional analysis (BFA) is an abbreviated assessment methodology derived from traditional extended functional analysis methods. BFAs are often conducted when time constraints in clinics, schools or homes are of concern. While BFAs have been used extensively to identify the function of problem behavior for children with disabilities, their utility with typically developing children has been questioned. This systematic review evaluates empirical studies, in which BFAs were employed with typically developing children to identify function of problem behavior. Twelve articles were reviewed and coded for quality indicators based on specific single-subject design criteria. Nine studies were considered to have acceptable quality and were summarized according to practice dimensions such as settings, therapists, problem behavior, and behavioral functions. Results suggest that BFA meets the standards for an empirically supported assessment methodology for typically developing children. Evidence is strongest for parents and teachers to serve as therapists when disruptive behavior is of concern.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-332
Number of pages20
JournalEducation and Treatment of Children
Volume35
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

functional analysis
methodology
therapist
Disabled Children
parents
Parents
disability
Problem Behavior
teacher
school
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

A systematic review of brief functional analysis methodology with typically developing children. / Gardner, Andrew W; Spencer, Trina D.; Boelter, Eric W.; Dubard, Melanie; Jennett, Heather K.

In: Education and Treatment of Children, Vol. 35, No. 2, 05.2012, p. 313-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gardner, Andrew W ; Spencer, Trina D. ; Boelter, Eric W. ; Dubard, Melanie ; Jennett, Heather K. / A systematic review of brief functional analysis methodology with typically developing children. In: Education and Treatment of Children. 2012 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 313-332.
@article{eb73e91b228745589b42b71175539d21,
title = "A systematic review of brief functional analysis methodology with typically developing children",
abstract = "Brief functional analysis (BFA) is an abbreviated assessment methodology derived from traditional extended functional analysis methods. BFAs are often conducted when time constraints in clinics, schools or homes are of concern. While BFAs have been used extensively to identify the function of problem behavior for children with disabilities, their utility with typically developing children has been questioned. This systematic review evaluates empirical studies, in which BFAs were employed with typically developing children to identify function of problem behavior. Twelve articles were reviewed and coded for quality indicators based on specific single-subject design criteria. Nine studies were considered to have acceptable quality and were summarized according to practice dimensions such as settings, therapists, problem behavior, and behavioral functions. Results suggest that BFA meets the standards for an empirically supported assessment methodology for typically developing children. Evidence is strongest for parents and teachers to serve as therapists when disruptive behavior is of concern.",
author = "Gardner, {Andrew W} and Spencer, {Trina D.} and Boelter, {Eric W.} and Melanie Dubard and Jennett, {Heather K.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "313--332",
journal = "Education and Treatment of Children",
issn = "0748-8491",
publisher = "West Virginia University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of brief functional analysis methodology with typically developing children

AU - Gardner, Andrew W

AU - Spencer, Trina D.

AU - Boelter, Eric W.

AU - Dubard, Melanie

AU - Jennett, Heather K.

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Brief functional analysis (BFA) is an abbreviated assessment methodology derived from traditional extended functional analysis methods. BFAs are often conducted when time constraints in clinics, schools or homes are of concern. While BFAs have been used extensively to identify the function of problem behavior for children with disabilities, their utility with typically developing children has been questioned. This systematic review evaluates empirical studies, in which BFAs were employed with typically developing children to identify function of problem behavior. Twelve articles were reviewed and coded for quality indicators based on specific single-subject design criteria. Nine studies were considered to have acceptable quality and were summarized according to practice dimensions such as settings, therapists, problem behavior, and behavioral functions. Results suggest that BFA meets the standards for an empirically supported assessment methodology for typically developing children. Evidence is strongest for parents and teachers to serve as therapists when disruptive behavior is of concern.

AB - Brief functional analysis (BFA) is an abbreviated assessment methodology derived from traditional extended functional analysis methods. BFAs are often conducted when time constraints in clinics, schools or homes are of concern. While BFAs have been used extensively to identify the function of problem behavior for children with disabilities, their utility with typically developing children has been questioned. This systematic review evaluates empirical studies, in which BFAs were employed with typically developing children to identify function of problem behavior. Twelve articles were reviewed and coded for quality indicators based on specific single-subject design criteria. Nine studies were considered to have acceptable quality and were summarized according to practice dimensions such as settings, therapists, problem behavior, and behavioral functions. Results suggest that BFA meets the standards for an empirically supported assessment methodology for typically developing children. Evidence is strongest for parents and teachers to serve as therapists when disruptive behavior is of concern.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860444095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860444095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860444095

VL - 35

SP - 313

EP - 332

JO - Education and Treatment of Children

JF - Education and Treatment of Children

SN - 0748-8491

IS - 2

ER -