A register perspective on grammar and discourse

Variability in the form and use of english complement clauses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the importance of register variation for analyses of grammar and discourse. The general theme is illustrated through consideration of variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. First, the patterns of use for four related grammatical constructions are considered: that-clauses and to-clauses, headed by verbs and by nouns. The differing discourse functions of each construction type are explored by considering their lexico-grammatical associations (i.e. the verbs or nouns most commonly occurring as the head of each type). However, it is shown that the characteristic uses of each type are conditioned by register. That is, each construction type has a different distribution across spoken and written registers, with a different set of associated lexical heads. A second study provides an even more striking illustration of this interaction between grammar, discourse, and register: the contextual factors conditioning the retention vs omission of the complementizer that. In this case, it is shown that each register has an overall norm, and that contextual factors are influential only when they work in opposition to that register norm. These case studies are presented to make the general point that analyses of grammar and discourse are often inadequate and misleading when they disregard register differences. Instead, a register perspective is required to capture the range of variability associated with grammatical patterns of use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-150
Number of pages20
JournalDiscourse Studies
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

grammar
Head
discourse
conditioning
opposition
Complement Clause
Grammar
Discourse
interaction
Contextual Factors
Nouns
Verbs
Interaction
Disregard
Conditioning
Discourse Functions
That-clauses
Clause
Complementizer
Grammatical Constructions

Keywords

  • Complement clauses
  • Corpus linguistics
  • Discourse function
  • English grammar
  • Lexico-grammar
  • Register variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Social Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Communication

Cite this

@article{c40c7df6b4ea4f7484073f70bfe94013,
title = "A register perspective on grammar and discourse: Variability in the form and use of english complement clauses",
abstract = "This article explores the importance of register variation for analyses of grammar and discourse. The general theme is illustrated through consideration of variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. First, the patterns of use for four related grammatical constructions are considered: that-clauses and to-clauses, headed by verbs and by nouns. The differing discourse functions of each construction type are explored by considering their lexico-grammatical associations (i.e. the verbs or nouns most commonly occurring as the head of each type). However, it is shown that the characteristic uses of each type are conditioned by register. That is, each construction type has a different distribution across spoken and written registers, with a different set of associated lexical heads. A second study provides an even more striking illustration of this interaction between grammar, discourse, and register: the contextual factors conditioning the retention vs omission of the complementizer that. In this case, it is shown that each register has an overall norm, and that contextual factors are influential only when they work in opposition to that register norm. These case studies are presented to make the general point that analyses of grammar and discourse are often inadequate and misleading when they disregard register differences. Instead, a register perspective is required to capture the range of variability associated with grammatical patterns of use.",
keywords = "Complement clauses, Corpus linguistics, Discourse function, English grammar, Lexico-grammar, Register variation",
author = "Biber, {Douglas E}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1177/1461445699001002001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "131--150",
journal = "Discourse Studies",
issn = "1461-4456",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A register perspective on grammar and discourse

T2 - Variability in the form and use of english complement clauses

AU - Biber, Douglas E

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This article explores the importance of register variation for analyses of grammar and discourse. The general theme is illustrated through consideration of variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. First, the patterns of use for four related grammatical constructions are considered: that-clauses and to-clauses, headed by verbs and by nouns. The differing discourse functions of each construction type are explored by considering their lexico-grammatical associations (i.e. the verbs or nouns most commonly occurring as the head of each type). However, it is shown that the characteristic uses of each type are conditioned by register. That is, each construction type has a different distribution across spoken and written registers, with a different set of associated lexical heads. A second study provides an even more striking illustration of this interaction between grammar, discourse, and register: the contextual factors conditioning the retention vs omission of the complementizer that. In this case, it is shown that each register has an overall norm, and that contextual factors are influential only when they work in opposition to that register norm. These case studies are presented to make the general point that analyses of grammar and discourse are often inadequate and misleading when they disregard register differences. Instead, a register perspective is required to capture the range of variability associated with grammatical patterns of use.

AB - This article explores the importance of register variation for analyses of grammar and discourse. The general theme is illustrated through consideration of variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. First, the patterns of use for four related grammatical constructions are considered: that-clauses and to-clauses, headed by verbs and by nouns. The differing discourse functions of each construction type are explored by considering their lexico-grammatical associations (i.e. the verbs or nouns most commonly occurring as the head of each type). However, it is shown that the characteristic uses of each type are conditioned by register. That is, each construction type has a different distribution across spoken and written registers, with a different set of associated lexical heads. A second study provides an even more striking illustration of this interaction between grammar, discourse, and register: the contextual factors conditioning the retention vs omission of the complementizer that. In this case, it is shown that each register has an overall norm, and that contextual factors are influential only when they work in opposition to that register norm. These case studies are presented to make the general point that analyses of grammar and discourse are often inadequate and misleading when they disregard register differences. Instead, a register perspective is required to capture the range of variability associated with grammatical patterns of use.

KW - Complement clauses

KW - Corpus linguistics

KW - Discourse function

KW - English grammar

KW - Lexico-grammar

KW - Register variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642340883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642340883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1461445699001002001

DO - 10.1177/1461445699001002001

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 131

EP - 150

JO - Discourse Studies

JF - Discourse Studies

SN - 1461-4456

IS - 2

ER -