A more social science: Barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy

Gerald G. Singh, Jordan Tam, Thomas D Sisk, Sarah C. Klain, Megan E. Mach, Rebecca G. Martone, Kai M A Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scientists are increasingly called upon to engage in policy formulation, but the literature on engagement is strong on speculation and weak on evidence. Using a survey administered at several broadly "ecological" conferences, we investigated: (1) the extent to which respondents engage in policy-related activities (including reporting scientific results, interpreting science for policy makers, integrating science into decision making, taking a position on a policy issue, and acting as a decision maker); (2) what factors best explain these types of engagement; and (3) whether respondents' activity levels match their stated beliefs on such activities. Different factors explain different forms of participation. Past negative experience was identified as a barrier to taking part in policy, while self-perceived competence in navigating the science-policy interface was consistently important in explaining activity across all engagement types, highlighting the importance of training programs linking scientists to policy. Many respondents believed that scientists should interpret, integrate, and advocate, which contrasts with previous research and relatively low levels of self-reported participation in policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-166
Number of pages6
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

social sciences
incentive
social science
policy
education programs
decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Singh, G. G., Tam, J., Sisk, T. D., Klain, S. C., Mach, M. E., Martone, R. G., & Chan, K. M. A. (2014). A more social science: Barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(3), 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1890/130011

A more social science : Barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy. / Singh, Gerald G.; Tam, Jordan; Sisk, Thomas D; Klain, Sarah C.; Mach, Megan E.; Martone, Rebecca G.; Chan, Kai M A.

In: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2014, p. 161-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Singh, Gerald G. ; Tam, Jordan ; Sisk, Thomas D ; Klain, Sarah C. ; Mach, Megan E. ; Martone, Rebecca G. ; Chan, Kai M A. / A more social science : Barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy. In: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2014 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 161-166.
@article{ef10cc4a71ee4e69aa874c7f3ba966b6,
title = "A more social science: Barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy",
abstract = "Scientists are increasingly called upon to engage in policy formulation, but the literature on engagement is strong on speculation and weak on evidence. Using a survey administered at several broadly {"}ecological{"} conferences, we investigated: (1) the extent to which respondents engage in policy-related activities (including reporting scientific results, interpreting science for policy makers, integrating science into decision making, taking a position on a policy issue, and acting as a decision maker); (2) what factors best explain these types of engagement; and (3) whether respondents' activity levels match their stated beliefs on such activities. Different factors explain different forms of participation. Past negative experience was identified as a barrier to taking part in policy, while self-perceived competence in navigating the science-policy interface was consistently important in explaining activity across all engagement types, highlighting the importance of training programs linking scientists to policy. Many respondents believed that scientists should interpret, integrate, and advocate, which contrasts with previous research and relatively low levels of self-reported participation in policy.",
author = "Singh, {Gerald G.} and Jordan Tam and Sisk, {Thomas D} and Klain, {Sarah C.} and Mach, {Megan E.} and Martone, {Rebecca G.} and Chan, {Kai M A}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1890/130011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "161--166",
journal = "Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment",
issn = "1540-9295",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A more social science

T2 - Barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy

AU - Singh, Gerald G.

AU - Tam, Jordan

AU - Sisk, Thomas D

AU - Klain, Sarah C.

AU - Mach, Megan E.

AU - Martone, Rebecca G.

AU - Chan, Kai M A

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Scientists are increasingly called upon to engage in policy formulation, but the literature on engagement is strong on speculation and weak on evidence. Using a survey administered at several broadly "ecological" conferences, we investigated: (1) the extent to which respondents engage in policy-related activities (including reporting scientific results, interpreting science for policy makers, integrating science into decision making, taking a position on a policy issue, and acting as a decision maker); (2) what factors best explain these types of engagement; and (3) whether respondents' activity levels match their stated beliefs on such activities. Different factors explain different forms of participation. Past negative experience was identified as a barrier to taking part in policy, while self-perceived competence in navigating the science-policy interface was consistently important in explaining activity across all engagement types, highlighting the importance of training programs linking scientists to policy. Many respondents believed that scientists should interpret, integrate, and advocate, which contrasts with previous research and relatively low levels of self-reported participation in policy.

AB - Scientists are increasingly called upon to engage in policy formulation, but the literature on engagement is strong on speculation and weak on evidence. Using a survey administered at several broadly "ecological" conferences, we investigated: (1) the extent to which respondents engage in policy-related activities (including reporting scientific results, interpreting science for policy makers, integrating science into decision making, taking a position on a policy issue, and acting as a decision maker); (2) what factors best explain these types of engagement; and (3) whether respondents' activity levels match their stated beliefs on such activities. Different factors explain different forms of participation. Past negative experience was identified as a barrier to taking part in policy, while self-perceived competence in navigating the science-policy interface was consistently important in explaining activity across all engagement types, highlighting the importance of training programs linking scientists to policy. Many respondents believed that scientists should interpret, integrate, and advocate, which contrasts with previous research and relatively low levels of self-reported participation in policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903204084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903204084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1890/130011

DO - 10.1890/130011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84903204084

VL - 12

SP - 161

EP - 166

JO - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

JF - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

SN - 1540-9295

IS - 3

ER -