A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research

EMMA MARSDEN, SOPHIE THOMPSON, Luke D Plonsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-paced reading tests (SPRs) are being increasingly adopted by second language (L2) researchers. Using SPR with L2 populations presents specific challenges, and its use is still evolving in L2 research (as well as in first language research, in many respects). Although the topic of several narrative overviews (Keating & Jegerski, 2015; Roberts, 2016), we do not have a comprehensive picture of its usage in L2 research. Building on the growing body of systematic reviews of research practices in applied linguistics (e.g., Liu & Brown, 2015; Plonsky, 2013), we report a methodological synthesis of the rationales, study contexts, and methodological decision making in L2 SPR research. Our comprehensive search yielded 74 SPRs used in L2 research. Each instrument was coded along 121 parameters, including: reported rationales and study characteristics, indicating the scope and nature of L2 SPR research agendas; design and analysis features and reporting practices, determining instrument validity and reliability; and materials transparency, affecting reproducibility and systematicity of agendas. Our findings indicate an urgent need to standardize the use and reporting of this technique, requiring empirical investigation to inform methodological decision making. We also identify several areas (e.g., study design, sample demographics, instrument construction, data analysis, and transparency) where SPR research could be improved to enrich our understanding of L2 processing, reading, and learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-44
Number of pages44
JournalApplied Psycholinguistics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 17 2018

Fingerprint

Reading
Language
language
Research
transparency
Decision Making
decision making
research practice
Second-language Research
Self-paced Reading
Linguistics
Reproducibility of Results
data analysis
Transparency
linguistics
narrative
Research Personnel
Demography
Learning
learning

Keywords

  • foreign language learning
  • moving window
  • open science
  • research design
  • research methodology
  • second language learning
  • self-paced reading
  • synthesis
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. / MARSDEN, EMMA; THOMPSON, SOPHIE; Plonsky, Luke D.

In: Applied Psycholinguistics, 17.05.2018, p. 1-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71c1a37ea68e4904b5831642fbfe47a2,
title = "A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research",
abstract = "Self-paced reading tests (SPRs) are being increasingly adopted by second language (L2) researchers. Using SPR with L2 populations presents specific challenges, and its use is still evolving in L2 research (as well as in first language research, in many respects). Although the topic of several narrative overviews (Keating & Jegerski, 2015; Roberts, 2016), we do not have a comprehensive picture of its usage in L2 research. Building on the growing body of systematic reviews of research practices in applied linguistics (e.g., Liu & Brown, 2015; Plonsky, 2013), we report a methodological synthesis of the rationales, study contexts, and methodological decision making in L2 SPR research. Our comprehensive search yielded 74 SPRs used in L2 research. Each instrument was coded along 121 parameters, including: reported rationales and study characteristics, indicating the scope and nature of L2 SPR research agendas; design and analysis features and reporting practices, determining instrument validity and reliability; and materials transparency, affecting reproducibility and systematicity of agendas. Our findings indicate an urgent need to standardize the use and reporting of this technique, requiring empirical investigation to inform methodological decision making. We also identify several areas (e.g., study design, sample demographics, instrument construction, data analysis, and transparency) where SPR research could be improved to enrich our understanding of L2 processing, reading, and learning.",
keywords = "foreign language learning, moving window, open science, research design, research methodology, second language learning, self-paced reading, synthesis, systematic review",
author = "EMMA MARSDEN and SOPHIE THOMPSON and Plonsky, {Luke D}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1017/S0142716418000036",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--44",
journal = "Applied Psycholinguistics",
issn = "0142-7164",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research

AU - MARSDEN, EMMA

AU - THOMPSON, SOPHIE

AU - Plonsky, Luke D

PY - 2018/5/17

Y1 - 2018/5/17

N2 - Self-paced reading tests (SPRs) are being increasingly adopted by second language (L2) researchers. Using SPR with L2 populations presents specific challenges, and its use is still evolving in L2 research (as well as in first language research, in many respects). Although the topic of several narrative overviews (Keating & Jegerski, 2015; Roberts, 2016), we do not have a comprehensive picture of its usage in L2 research. Building on the growing body of systematic reviews of research practices in applied linguistics (e.g., Liu & Brown, 2015; Plonsky, 2013), we report a methodological synthesis of the rationales, study contexts, and methodological decision making in L2 SPR research. Our comprehensive search yielded 74 SPRs used in L2 research. Each instrument was coded along 121 parameters, including: reported rationales and study characteristics, indicating the scope and nature of L2 SPR research agendas; design and analysis features and reporting practices, determining instrument validity and reliability; and materials transparency, affecting reproducibility and systematicity of agendas. Our findings indicate an urgent need to standardize the use and reporting of this technique, requiring empirical investigation to inform methodological decision making. We also identify several areas (e.g., study design, sample demographics, instrument construction, data analysis, and transparency) where SPR research could be improved to enrich our understanding of L2 processing, reading, and learning.

AB - Self-paced reading tests (SPRs) are being increasingly adopted by second language (L2) researchers. Using SPR with L2 populations presents specific challenges, and its use is still evolving in L2 research (as well as in first language research, in many respects). Although the topic of several narrative overviews (Keating & Jegerski, 2015; Roberts, 2016), we do not have a comprehensive picture of its usage in L2 research. Building on the growing body of systematic reviews of research practices in applied linguistics (e.g., Liu & Brown, 2015; Plonsky, 2013), we report a methodological synthesis of the rationales, study contexts, and methodological decision making in L2 SPR research. Our comprehensive search yielded 74 SPRs used in L2 research. Each instrument was coded along 121 parameters, including: reported rationales and study characteristics, indicating the scope and nature of L2 SPR research agendas; design and analysis features and reporting practices, determining instrument validity and reliability; and materials transparency, affecting reproducibility and systematicity of agendas. Our findings indicate an urgent need to standardize the use and reporting of this technique, requiring empirical investigation to inform methodological decision making. We also identify several areas (e.g., study design, sample demographics, instrument construction, data analysis, and transparency) where SPR research could be improved to enrich our understanding of L2 processing, reading, and learning.

KW - foreign language learning

KW - moving window

KW - open science

KW - research design

KW - research methodology

KW - second language learning

KW - self-paced reading

KW - synthesis

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047161939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047161939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0142716418000036

DO - 10.1017/S0142716418000036

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 44

JO - Applied Psycholinguistics

JF - Applied Psycholinguistics

SN - 0142-7164

ER -