A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies

Deborah N. Huntzinger, Thomas D. Eatmon

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  • 278 Citations

Abstract

Concern over the impact of anthropogenic carbon emissions on the global climate has increased in recent years due to growth in global warming awareness. Approximately 5% of global CO2 emissions originate from the manufacturing of cement, the third largest source of carbon emission in the United States. In addition to the generation of CO2 the cement manufacturing process produces millions of tons of the waste product cement kiln dust (CKD) each year contributing to respiratory and pollution health risks. In this paper LCA is used to evaluate the environmental impact of four cement manufacturing processes: (1) the production of traditional Portland cement, (2) blended cement (natural pozzolans), (3) cement where 100% of waste cement kiln dust is recycled into the kiln process, and (4) Portland cement produced when cement kiln dust (CKD) is used to sequester a portion of the process related CO2 emissions. To reduce uncertainty this manuscript presents a cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment of several cement products. Analysis using SimaPro 6.0 software shows that blended cements provide the greatest environmental savings followed by utilization of CKD for sequestration. The recycling of CKD was found to have little environmental savings over the traditional process.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages668-675
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume17
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

cement
manufacturing
life cycle
alternative technology
Portland cement
Life cycle
Cements
Life cycle assessment
Manufacturing
Cement
Kilns
Dust
dust
Carbon
carbon emission
savings
product
Carbon emissions
Manufacturing process
Savings

Keywords

  • Cement production
  • Environmental impacts
  • Global warming
  • Natural pozzolans
  • Portland cement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{27afc646186340648f77b9a25c27823e,
title = "A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies",
abstract = "Concern over the impact of anthropogenic carbon emissions on the global climate has increased in recent years due to growth in global warming awareness. Approximately 5% of global CO2 emissions originate from the manufacturing of cement, the third largest source of carbon emission in the United States. In addition to the generation of CO2 the cement manufacturing process produces millions of tons of the waste product cement kiln dust (CKD) each year contributing to respiratory and pollution health risks. In this paper LCA is used to evaluate the environmental impact of four cement manufacturing processes: (1) the production of traditional Portland cement, (2) blended cement (natural pozzolans), (3) cement where 100% of waste cement kiln dust is recycled into the kiln process, and (4) Portland cement produced when cement kiln dust (CKD) is used to sequester a portion of the process related CO2 emissions. To reduce uncertainty this manuscript presents a cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment of several cement products. Analysis using SimaPro 6.0 software shows that blended cements provide the greatest environmental savings followed by utilization of CKD for sequestration. The recycling of CKD was found to have little environmental savings over the traditional process.",
keywords = "Cement production, Environmental impacts, Global warming, Natural pozzolans, Portland cement",
author = "Huntzinger, {Deborah N.} and Eatmon, {Thomas D.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007",
volume = "17",
pages = "668--675",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing

T2 - Journal of Cleaner Production

AU - Huntzinger,Deborah N.

AU - Eatmon,Thomas D.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Concern over the impact of anthropogenic carbon emissions on the global climate has increased in recent years due to growth in global warming awareness. Approximately 5% of global CO2 emissions originate from the manufacturing of cement, the third largest source of carbon emission in the United States. In addition to the generation of CO2 the cement manufacturing process produces millions of tons of the waste product cement kiln dust (CKD) each year contributing to respiratory and pollution health risks. In this paper LCA is used to evaluate the environmental impact of four cement manufacturing processes: (1) the production of traditional Portland cement, (2) blended cement (natural pozzolans), (3) cement where 100% of waste cement kiln dust is recycled into the kiln process, and (4) Portland cement produced when cement kiln dust (CKD) is used to sequester a portion of the process related CO2 emissions. To reduce uncertainty this manuscript presents a cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment of several cement products. Analysis using SimaPro 6.0 software shows that blended cements provide the greatest environmental savings followed by utilization of CKD for sequestration. The recycling of CKD was found to have little environmental savings over the traditional process.

AB - Concern over the impact of anthropogenic carbon emissions on the global climate has increased in recent years due to growth in global warming awareness. Approximately 5% of global CO2 emissions originate from the manufacturing of cement, the third largest source of carbon emission in the United States. In addition to the generation of CO2 the cement manufacturing process produces millions of tons of the waste product cement kiln dust (CKD) each year contributing to respiratory and pollution health risks. In this paper LCA is used to evaluate the environmental impact of four cement manufacturing processes: (1) the production of traditional Portland cement, (2) blended cement (natural pozzolans), (3) cement where 100% of waste cement kiln dust is recycled into the kiln process, and (4) Portland cement produced when cement kiln dust (CKD) is used to sequester a portion of the process related CO2 emissions. To reduce uncertainty this manuscript presents a cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment of several cement products. Analysis using SimaPro 6.0 software shows that blended cements provide the greatest environmental savings followed by utilization of CKD for sequestration. The recycling of CKD was found to have little environmental savings over the traditional process.

KW - Cement production

KW - Environmental impacts

KW - Global warming

KW - Natural pozzolans

KW - Portland cement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60849089328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60849089328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 668

EP - 675

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

IS - 7

ER -