A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science

Paul Beier, Lara J. Hansen, Lynn Helbrecht, David Behar

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Resource managers often need scientific information to match their decisions (typically short-term and local) to complex, long-term, large-scale challenges such as adaptation to climate change. In such situations, the most reliable route to actionable science is coproduction, whereby managers, policy makers, scientists, and other stakeholders first identify specific decisions to be informed by science, and then jointly define the scope and context of the problem, research questions, methods, and outputs, make scientific inferences, and develop strategies for the appropriate use of science. Here, we present seven recommended practices intended to help scientists, managers, funders and other stakeholders carry out a coproduction project, one recommended practice to ensure that partners learn from attempts at coproduction, and two practices to promote coproduction at a programmatic level. The recommended practices focus research on decisions that need to be made, give priority to processes and outcomes over stand-alone products, and allocate resources to organizations and individuals that engage in coproduction. Although this article focuses on the coproduction of actionable science for climate change adaptation and natural resource management, the approach is relevant to other complex natural-human systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-296
Number of pages9
JournalConservation Letters
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

managers
stakeholders
climate change
stakeholder
natural resource management
research methods
research method
resource
resource management
natural resource
science
decision

Keywords

  • Actionable science
  • adaptation
  • climate change
  • coproduction
  • decision support
  • resource management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science. / Beier, Paul; Hansen, Lara J.; Helbrecht, Lynn; Behar, David.

In: Conservation Letters, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.05.2017, p. 288-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Beier, P, Hansen, LJ, Helbrecht, L & Behar, D 2017, 'A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science', Conservation Letters, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 288-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12300
Beier, Paul ; Hansen, Lara J. ; Helbrecht, Lynn ; Behar, David. / A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science. In: Conservation Letters. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 288-296.
@article{5f9d25a9c7bb46279b16737bcae87ad9,
title = "A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science",
abstract = "Resource managers often need scientific information to match their decisions (typically short-term and local) to complex, long-term, large-scale challenges such as adaptation to climate change. In such situations, the most reliable route to actionable science is coproduction, whereby managers, policy makers, scientists, and other stakeholders first identify specific decisions to be informed by science, and then jointly define the scope and context of the problem, research questions, methods, and outputs, make scientific inferences, and develop strategies for the appropriate use of science. Here, we present seven recommended practices intended to help scientists, managers, funders and other stakeholders carry out a coproduction project, one recommended practice to ensure that partners learn from attempts at coproduction, and two practices to promote coproduction at a programmatic level. The recommended practices focus research on decisions that need to be made, give priority to processes and outcomes over stand-alone products, and allocate resources to organizations and individuals that engage in coproduction. Although this article focuses on the coproduction of actionable science for climate change adaptation and natural resource management, the approach is relevant to other complex natural-human systems.",
keywords = "Actionable science, adaptation, climate change, coproduction, decision support, resource management",
author = "Paul Beier and Hansen, {Lara J.} and Lynn Helbrecht and David Behar",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/conl.12300",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "288--296",
journal = "Conservation Letters",
issn = "1755-263X",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science

AU - Beier, Paul

AU - Hansen, Lara J.

AU - Helbrecht, Lynn

AU - Behar, David

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Resource managers often need scientific information to match their decisions (typically short-term and local) to complex, long-term, large-scale challenges such as adaptation to climate change. In such situations, the most reliable route to actionable science is coproduction, whereby managers, policy makers, scientists, and other stakeholders first identify specific decisions to be informed by science, and then jointly define the scope and context of the problem, research questions, methods, and outputs, make scientific inferences, and develop strategies for the appropriate use of science. Here, we present seven recommended practices intended to help scientists, managers, funders and other stakeholders carry out a coproduction project, one recommended practice to ensure that partners learn from attempts at coproduction, and two practices to promote coproduction at a programmatic level. The recommended practices focus research on decisions that need to be made, give priority to processes and outcomes over stand-alone products, and allocate resources to organizations and individuals that engage in coproduction. Although this article focuses on the coproduction of actionable science for climate change adaptation and natural resource management, the approach is relevant to other complex natural-human systems.

AB - Resource managers often need scientific information to match their decisions (typically short-term and local) to complex, long-term, large-scale challenges such as adaptation to climate change. In such situations, the most reliable route to actionable science is coproduction, whereby managers, policy makers, scientists, and other stakeholders first identify specific decisions to be informed by science, and then jointly define the scope and context of the problem, research questions, methods, and outputs, make scientific inferences, and develop strategies for the appropriate use of science. Here, we present seven recommended practices intended to help scientists, managers, funders and other stakeholders carry out a coproduction project, one recommended practice to ensure that partners learn from attempts at coproduction, and two practices to promote coproduction at a programmatic level. The recommended practices focus research on decisions that need to be made, give priority to processes and outcomes over stand-alone products, and allocate resources to organizations and individuals that engage in coproduction. Although this article focuses on the coproduction of actionable science for climate change adaptation and natural resource management, the approach is relevant to other complex natural-human systems.

KW - Actionable science

KW - adaptation

KW - climate change

KW - coproduction

KW - decision support

KW - resource management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85001716363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85001716363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/conl.12300

DO - 10.1111/conl.12300

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85001716363

VL - 10

SP - 288

EP - 296

JO - Conservation Letters

JF - Conservation Letters

SN - 1755-263X

IS - 3

ER -