A diagnostic evaluation model for complex research partnerships with community engagement: The partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention (NACP) model

Robert T Trotter II, Kelly Laurila, David Alberts, Laura F Huenneke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Complex community oriented health care prevention and intervention partnerships fail or only partially succeed at alarming rates. In light of the current rapid expansion of critically needed programs targeted at health disparities in minority populations, we have designed and are testing an "logic model plus" evaluation model that combines classic logic model and query based evaluation designs (CDC, NIH, Kellogg Foundation) with advances in community engaged designs derived from industry-university partnership models. These approaches support the application of a "near real time" feedback system (diagnosis and intervention) based on organizational theory, social network theory, and logic model metrics directed at partnership dynamics, combined with logic model metrics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10-20
Number of pages11
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume48
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

North American Indians
cancer
diagnostic
evaluation
Research
community
Neoplasms
Community Health Services
Computer Systems
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Social Support
Industry
social network
health care
Logic model
Diagnostics
Native Americans
Community engagement
Evaluation model
Cancer

Keywords

  • Cancer program evaluation
  • Community engaged evaluation
  • Health disparities evaluation
  • Logic model design
  • Organizational culture evaluation
  • Organizational theory
  • Partnership best practices
  • Partnership failure
  • Partnership success
  • Social network models of partnerships

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

@article{7d658b4d476048e3b38639ab66c24127,
title = "A diagnostic evaluation model for complex research partnerships with community engagement: The partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention (NACP) model",
abstract = "Complex community oriented health care prevention and intervention partnerships fail or only partially succeed at alarming rates. In light of the current rapid expansion of critically needed programs targeted at health disparities in minority populations, we have designed and are testing an {"}logic model plus{"} evaluation model that combines classic logic model and query based evaluation designs (CDC, NIH, Kellogg Foundation) with advances in community engaged designs derived from industry-university partnership models. These approaches support the application of a {"}near real time{"} feedback system (diagnosis and intervention) based on organizational theory, social network theory, and logic model metrics directed at partnership dynamics, combined with logic model metrics.",
keywords = "Cancer program evaluation, Community engaged evaluation, Health disparities evaluation, Logic model design, Organizational culture evaluation, Organizational theory, Partnership best practices, Partnership failure, Partnership success, Social network models of partnerships",
author = "{Trotter II}, {Robert T} and Kelly Laurila and David Alberts and Huenneke, {Laura F}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "10--20",
journal = "Evaluation and Program Planning",
issn = "0149-7189",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A diagnostic evaluation model for complex research partnerships with community engagement

T2 - The partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention (NACP) model

AU - Trotter II, Robert T

AU - Laurila, Kelly

AU - Alberts, David

AU - Huenneke, Laura F

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Complex community oriented health care prevention and intervention partnerships fail or only partially succeed at alarming rates. In light of the current rapid expansion of critically needed programs targeted at health disparities in minority populations, we have designed and are testing an "logic model plus" evaluation model that combines classic logic model and query based evaluation designs (CDC, NIH, Kellogg Foundation) with advances in community engaged designs derived from industry-university partnership models. These approaches support the application of a "near real time" feedback system (diagnosis and intervention) based on organizational theory, social network theory, and logic model metrics directed at partnership dynamics, combined with logic model metrics.

AB - Complex community oriented health care prevention and intervention partnerships fail or only partially succeed at alarming rates. In light of the current rapid expansion of critically needed programs targeted at health disparities in minority populations, we have designed and are testing an "logic model plus" evaluation model that combines classic logic model and query based evaluation designs (CDC, NIH, Kellogg Foundation) with advances in community engaged designs derived from industry-university partnership models. These approaches support the application of a "near real time" feedback system (diagnosis and intervention) based on organizational theory, social network theory, and logic model metrics directed at partnership dynamics, combined with logic model metrics.

KW - Cancer program evaluation

KW - Community engaged evaluation

KW - Health disparities evaluation

KW - Logic model design

KW - Organizational culture evaluation

KW - Organizational theory

KW - Partnership best practices

KW - Partnership failure

KW - Partnership success

KW - Social network models of partnerships

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930935592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930935592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 10

EP - 20

JO - Evaluation and Program Planning

JF - Evaluation and Program Planning

SN - 0149-7189

ER -