A comparison of fire hazard mitigation alternatives in pinyon-juniper woodlands of Arizona

David W. Huffman, Peter Z Fule, Joseph E. Crouse, Kristen M. Pearson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concern over uncontrollable wildfire in pinyon-juniper woodlands has led public land managers in the southwestern United States to seek approaches for mitigating wildfire hazard, yet little information is available concerning effectiveness and ecological responses of alternative treatments. We established a randomized block experiment at a pinyon-juniper site in northern Arizona and tested effects of no treatment (Control), thinning only (Thin), prescribed fire only (Burn), and thinning followed by prescribed fire (Thin + Burn) on overstory structure, hazardous fuels reduction, and woody understory responses. One year after implementation, mean trees per hectare (TPH) of Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) and pinyon pine (Pinus edulis), and basal area (BA) of pinyon, were significantly (P < 0.05) less in Thin and Thin + Burn treatments than Control. Additionally, pinyon TPH was less in Burn than Control. Quadratic mean diameter was significantly greater in Thin and Thin + Burn than in Control and Burn treatments. Thinning shifted diameter distributions from uneven- to even-sized. Crown fuel load (CFL) of both pinyon and juniper was significantly lower in Thin and Thin + Burn compared with Control and Burn treatments. Thin, Burn, and Thin + Burn treatments resulted in significantly greater 1-h surface fuel loads compared with the Control. The Thin treatment resulted in significantly greater mean load of the 1000-h fuel class compared with Burn and Control treatments, but did not differ from Thin + Burn. Forest floor Oi (litter) layer was not significantly affected by the treatments but Oe + Oa (duff) depth was significantly less in the Burn treatment compared with Thin and Control. Live shrubs and tree regeneration showed no differences among treatments. We concluded that thinning and thinning followed by prescribed fire were effective approaches for fuels reduction; however, resulting stand structures may be novel and outside the historical range of variability. Prescribed fire alone had minimal effects on structure and fuels reduction. Woody shrubs and tree regeneration in the understory suggested that these treatments may not have long-term deleterious ecological effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)628-635
Number of pages8
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume257
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 31 2009

Fingerprint

Juniperus osteosperma
fire hazard
woodlands
woodland
mitigation
thinning (plants)
thinning
prescribed burning
hazard
wildfires
wildfire
understory
shrub
shrubs
regeneration
Pinus edulis
public lands
Southwestern United States
stand structure
overstory

Keywords

  • Juniperus osteosperma
  • Mechanical thinning
  • Pinus edulis
  • Prescribed fire
  • Wildland-urban interface

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

A comparison of fire hazard mitigation alternatives in pinyon-juniper woodlands of Arizona. / Huffman, David W.; Fule, Peter Z; Crouse, Joseph E.; Pearson, Kristen M.

In: Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 257, No. 2, 31.01.2009, p. 628-635.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huffman, David W. ; Fule, Peter Z ; Crouse, Joseph E. ; Pearson, Kristen M. / A comparison of fire hazard mitigation alternatives in pinyon-juniper woodlands of Arizona. In: Forest Ecology and Management. 2009 ; Vol. 257, No. 2. pp. 628-635.
@article{d5d00157b1dd4aa6bef3b2bd9cd3e768,
title = "A comparison of fire hazard mitigation alternatives in pinyon-juniper woodlands of Arizona",
abstract = "Concern over uncontrollable wildfire in pinyon-juniper woodlands has led public land managers in the southwestern United States to seek approaches for mitigating wildfire hazard, yet little information is available concerning effectiveness and ecological responses of alternative treatments. We established a randomized block experiment at a pinyon-juniper site in northern Arizona and tested effects of no treatment (Control), thinning only (Thin), prescribed fire only (Burn), and thinning followed by prescribed fire (Thin + Burn) on overstory structure, hazardous fuels reduction, and woody understory responses. One year after implementation, mean trees per hectare (TPH) of Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) and pinyon pine (Pinus edulis), and basal area (BA) of pinyon, were significantly (P < 0.05) less in Thin and Thin + Burn treatments than Control. Additionally, pinyon TPH was less in Burn than Control. Quadratic mean diameter was significantly greater in Thin and Thin + Burn than in Control and Burn treatments. Thinning shifted diameter distributions from uneven- to even-sized. Crown fuel load (CFL) of both pinyon and juniper was significantly lower in Thin and Thin + Burn compared with Control and Burn treatments. Thin, Burn, and Thin + Burn treatments resulted in significantly greater 1-h surface fuel loads compared with the Control. The Thin treatment resulted in significantly greater mean load of the 1000-h fuel class compared with Burn and Control treatments, but did not differ from Thin + Burn. Forest floor Oi (litter) layer was not significantly affected by the treatments but Oe + Oa (duff) depth was significantly less in the Burn treatment compared with Thin and Control. Live shrubs and tree regeneration showed no differences among treatments. We concluded that thinning and thinning followed by prescribed fire were effective approaches for fuels reduction; however, resulting stand structures may be novel and outside the historical range of variability. Prescribed fire alone had minimal effects on structure and fuels reduction. Woody shrubs and tree regeneration in the understory suggested that these treatments may not have long-term deleterious ecological effects.",
keywords = "Juniperus osteosperma, Mechanical thinning, Pinus edulis, Prescribed fire, Wildland-urban interface",
author = "Huffman, {David W.} and Fule, {Peter Z} and Crouse, {Joseph E.} and Pearson, {Kristen M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "257",
pages = "628--635",
journal = "Forest Ecology and Management",
issn = "0378-1127",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of fire hazard mitigation alternatives in pinyon-juniper woodlands of Arizona

AU - Huffman, David W.

AU - Fule, Peter Z

AU - Crouse, Joseph E.

AU - Pearson, Kristen M.

PY - 2009/1/31

Y1 - 2009/1/31

N2 - Concern over uncontrollable wildfire in pinyon-juniper woodlands has led public land managers in the southwestern United States to seek approaches for mitigating wildfire hazard, yet little information is available concerning effectiveness and ecological responses of alternative treatments. We established a randomized block experiment at a pinyon-juniper site in northern Arizona and tested effects of no treatment (Control), thinning only (Thin), prescribed fire only (Burn), and thinning followed by prescribed fire (Thin + Burn) on overstory structure, hazardous fuels reduction, and woody understory responses. One year after implementation, mean trees per hectare (TPH) of Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) and pinyon pine (Pinus edulis), and basal area (BA) of pinyon, were significantly (P < 0.05) less in Thin and Thin + Burn treatments than Control. Additionally, pinyon TPH was less in Burn than Control. Quadratic mean diameter was significantly greater in Thin and Thin + Burn than in Control and Burn treatments. Thinning shifted diameter distributions from uneven- to even-sized. Crown fuel load (CFL) of both pinyon and juniper was significantly lower in Thin and Thin + Burn compared with Control and Burn treatments. Thin, Burn, and Thin + Burn treatments resulted in significantly greater 1-h surface fuel loads compared with the Control. The Thin treatment resulted in significantly greater mean load of the 1000-h fuel class compared with Burn and Control treatments, but did not differ from Thin + Burn. Forest floor Oi (litter) layer was not significantly affected by the treatments but Oe + Oa (duff) depth was significantly less in the Burn treatment compared with Thin and Control. Live shrubs and tree regeneration showed no differences among treatments. We concluded that thinning and thinning followed by prescribed fire were effective approaches for fuels reduction; however, resulting stand structures may be novel and outside the historical range of variability. Prescribed fire alone had minimal effects on structure and fuels reduction. Woody shrubs and tree regeneration in the understory suggested that these treatments may not have long-term deleterious ecological effects.

AB - Concern over uncontrollable wildfire in pinyon-juniper woodlands has led public land managers in the southwestern United States to seek approaches for mitigating wildfire hazard, yet little information is available concerning effectiveness and ecological responses of alternative treatments. We established a randomized block experiment at a pinyon-juniper site in northern Arizona and tested effects of no treatment (Control), thinning only (Thin), prescribed fire only (Burn), and thinning followed by prescribed fire (Thin + Burn) on overstory structure, hazardous fuels reduction, and woody understory responses. One year after implementation, mean trees per hectare (TPH) of Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) and pinyon pine (Pinus edulis), and basal area (BA) of pinyon, were significantly (P < 0.05) less in Thin and Thin + Burn treatments than Control. Additionally, pinyon TPH was less in Burn than Control. Quadratic mean diameter was significantly greater in Thin and Thin + Burn than in Control and Burn treatments. Thinning shifted diameter distributions from uneven- to even-sized. Crown fuel load (CFL) of both pinyon and juniper was significantly lower in Thin and Thin + Burn compared with Control and Burn treatments. Thin, Burn, and Thin + Burn treatments resulted in significantly greater 1-h surface fuel loads compared with the Control. The Thin treatment resulted in significantly greater mean load of the 1000-h fuel class compared with Burn and Control treatments, but did not differ from Thin + Burn. Forest floor Oi (litter) layer was not significantly affected by the treatments but Oe + Oa (duff) depth was significantly less in the Burn treatment compared with Thin and Control. Live shrubs and tree regeneration showed no differences among treatments. We concluded that thinning and thinning followed by prescribed fire were effective approaches for fuels reduction; however, resulting stand structures may be novel and outside the historical range of variability. Prescribed fire alone had minimal effects on structure and fuels reduction. Woody shrubs and tree regeneration in the understory suggested that these treatments may not have long-term deleterious ecological effects.

KW - Juniperus osteosperma

KW - Mechanical thinning

KW - Pinus edulis

KW - Prescribed fire

KW - Wildland-urban interface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56649102169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56649102169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.041

DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.041

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:56649102169

VL - 257

SP - 628

EP - 635

JO - Forest Ecology and Management

JF - Forest Ecology and Management

SN - 0378-1127

IS - 2

ER -