A comparative evaluation of the tissue responses associated with polymeric implants in the rat and mouse

K. R. Kidd, D. B. Dal Ponte, Robert S Kellar, S. K. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

End product application is an important consideration when evaluating a material in an in vivo setting (Didisheim, Cardiovasc Pathol 1993;2:1S-2S). Small animal models allow high through-put evaluation of biocompatability. Previous preclinical evaluations have often used a rat subcutaneous model for the characterization of material-tissue interaction. Recent advances in genetic manipulation have provided mouse models with selective expression of a wide range of critical proteins. The rat model does not have many of the resources (i.e., knockouts, SCID, nude) that are present in mouse strains. The availability of these mice provides a resource to delineate the mechanisms regulating the healing associated with implants. However, before the mouse models can be used, they must be validated with respect to their ability to accurately assess tissue reponses to materials. In this study the tissue responses after the implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) were compared between rat and mouse. Discs of ePTFE (30-μm internodal distance) were implanted in subcutaneous and epididymal fat tissue of rats (Sprague-Dawley) and mice (129-SVJ). After 5 weeks the samples were removed and evaluated for vascular density, inflammation, and fibrous encapsulation. No difference in the vessel density was observed within the peri-implant subcutaneous and adipose tissue or within the porous material. However, a significant difference was found in the number of activated macrophages and giant cells between these two species. Implants in the rat exhibited greater numbers of activated inflammatory cells in the peri-implant tissue. The data indicate that the mouse and rat provide a comparable model for evaluating angiogenesis and neovascularization associated with synthetic porous implants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)682-689
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Biomedical Materials Research
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rats
Tissue
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Polytetrafluoroethylenes
Macrophages
Oils and fats
Encapsulation
Porous materials
Polymeric implants
Animals
Fats
Availability
Proteins

Keywords

  • Angiogenesis
  • Neovascularization
  • Polymeric implants
  • Tissue responses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biomaterials

Cite this

A comparative evaluation of the tissue responses associated with polymeric implants in the rat and mouse. / Kidd, K. R.; Dal Ponte, D. B.; Kellar, Robert S; Williams, S. K.

In: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 59, No. 4, 15.03.2002, p. 682-689.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e691fe1ee55a458e82434f611a20f092,
title = "A comparative evaluation of the tissue responses associated with polymeric implants in the rat and mouse",
abstract = "End product application is an important consideration when evaluating a material in an in vivo setting (Didisheim, Cardiovasc Pathol 1993;2:1S-2S). Small animal models allow high through-put evaluation of biocompatability. Previous preclinical evaluations have often used a rat subcutaneous model for the characterization of material-tissue interaction. Recent advances in genetic manipulation have provided mouse models with selective expression of a wide range of critical proteins. The rat model does not have many of the resources (i.e., knockouts, SCID, nude) that are present in mouse strains. The availability of these mice provides a resource to delineate the mechanisms regulating the healing associated with implants. However, before the mouse models can be used, they must be validated with respect to their ability to accurately assess tissue reponses to materials. In this study the tissue responses after the implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) were compared between rat and mouse. Discs of ePTFE (30-μm internodal distance) were implanted in subcutaneous and epididymal fat tissue of rats (Sprague-Dawley) and mice (129-SVJ). After 5 weeks the samples were removed and evaluated for vascular density, inflammation, and fibrous encapsulation. No difference in the vessel density was observed within the peri-implant subcutaneous and adipose tissue or within the porous material. However, a significant difference was found in the number of activated macrophages and giant cells between these two species. Implants in the rat exhibited greater numbers of activated inflammatory cells in the peri-implant tissue. The data indicate that the mouse and rat provide a comparable model for evaluating angiogenesis and neovascularization associated with synthetic porous implants.",
keywords = "Angiogenesis, Neovascularization, Polymeric implants, Tissue responses",
author = "Kidd, {K. R.} and {Dal Ponte}, {D. B.} and Kellar, {Robert S} and Williams, {S. K.}",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/jbm.10032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "682--689",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Materials Research",
issn = "0021-9304",
publisher = "Heterocorporation",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative evaluation of the tissue responses associated with polymeric implants in the rat and mouse

AU - Kidd, K. R.

AU - Dal Ponte, D. B.

AU - Kellar, Robert S

AU - Williams, S. K.

PY - 2002/3/15

Y1 - 2002/3/15

N2 - End product application is an important consideration when evaluating a material in an in vivo setting (Didisheim, Cardiovasc Pathol 1993;2:1S-2S). Small animal models allow high through-put evaluation of biocompatability. Previous preclinical evaluations have often used a rat subcutaneous model for the characterization of material-tissue interaction. Recent advances in genetic manipulation have provided mouse models with selective expression of a wide range of critical proteins. The rat model does not have many of the resources (i.e., knockouts, SCID, nude) that are present in mouse strains. The availability of these mice provides a resource to delineate the mechanisms regulating the healing associated with implants. However, before the mouse models can be used, they must be validated with respect to their ability to accurately assess tissue reponses to materials. In this study the tissue responses after the implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) were compared between rat and mouse. Discs of ePTFE (30-μm internodal distance) were implanted in subcutaneous and epididymal fat tissue of rats (Sprague-Dawley) and mice (129-SVJ). After 5 weeks the samples were removed and evaluated for vascular density, inflammation, and fibrous encapsulation. No difference in the vessel density was observed within the peri-implant subcutaneous and adipose tissue or within the porous material. However, a significant difference was found in the number of activated macrophages and giant cells between these two species. Implants in the rat exhibited greater numbers of activated inflammatory cells in the peri-implant tissue. The data indicate that the mouse and rat provide a comparable model for evaluating angiogenesis and neovascularization associated with synthetic porous implants.

AB - End product application is an important consideration when evaluating a material in an in vivo setting (Didisheim, Cardiovasc Pathol 1993;2:1S-2S). Small animal models allow high through-put evaluation of biocompatability. Previous preclinical evaluations have often used a rat subcutaneous model for the characterization of material-tissue interaction. Recent advances in genetic manipulation have provided mouse models with selective expression of a wide range of critical proteins. The rat model does not have many of the resources (i.e., knockouts, SCID, nude) that are present in mouse strains. The availability of these mice provides a resource to delineate the mechanisms regulating the healing associated with implants. However, before the mouse models can be used, they must be validated with respect to their ability to accurately assess tissue reponses to materials. In this study the tissue responses after the implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) were compared between rat and mouse. Discs of ePTFE (30-μm internodal distance) were implanted in subcutaneous and epididymal fat tissue of rats (Sprague-Dawley) and mice (129-SVJ). After 5 weeks the samples were removed and evaluated for vascular density, inflammation, and fibrous encapsulation. No difference in the vessel density was observed within the peri-implant subcutaneous and adipose tissue or within the porous material. However, a significant difference was found in the number of activated macrophages and giant cells between these two species. Implants in the rat exhibited greater numbers of activated inflammatory cells in the peri-implant tissue. The data indicate that the mouse and rat provide a comparable model for evaluating angiogenesis and neovascularization associated with synthetic porous implants.

KW - Angiogenesis

KW - Neovascularization

KW - Polymeric implants

KW - Tissue responses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037086722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037086722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jbm.10032

DO - 10.1002/jbm.10032

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 682

EP - 689

JO - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

JF - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

SN - 0021-9304

IS - 4

ER -