A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology andmanagement

Thomas G Whitham, Catherine A Gehring, Luke M. Evans, Carri J. LeRoy, Randy K. Bangert, Jennifer A. Schweitzer, Gerard J Allan, Robert C. Barbour, Dylan G. Fischer, Bradley M. Potts, Joseph K. Bailey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The emerging field of community and ecosystem genetics has so far focused on how the genetic variation in one species can influence the composition of associated communities and ecosystem processes such as decomposition (see definitions in Table 3–1; reviews by Whitham et al. 2003, 2006; Johnson&Stinchcombe 2007; Hughes et al. 2008). A key component of this approach has been an emphasis on understanding how the genetics of foundation plant species influence a much larger community. It is reasoned that because foundation species structure their ecosystems by creating locally stable conditions and provide specific resources for diverse organisms (Dayton 1972; Ellison et al. 2005), the genetics of these species as “community drivers” are most important to understand and most likely to have cascading ecological and evolutionary effects throughout an ecosystem (Whitham et al. 2006). For example, when a foundation species’ genotype influences the relative fitness of other species, it constitutes an indirect genetic interaction (Shuster et al. 2006), and when these interactions change species composition and abundance among individual tree genotypes, they result in individual genotypes having distinct community and ecosystem phenotypes. Thus, in addition to an individual genotype having the “traditional” phenotype that population geneticists typically consider as the expression of a trait at the individual and population level, community geneticists must also consider higher-level phenotypes at the community and ecosystem level. The predictability of phenotypes at levels higher than the population can be quantified as community heritability (i.e., the tendency for related individuals to support similar communities of organisms and ecosystem processes; Whitham et al. 2003, 2006; Shuster et al. 2006).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMolecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages50-73
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)9780511777592, 9780521515641
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Ecosystem
Biological Sciences
ecosystems
Genotype
Phenotype
phenotype
geneticists
genotype
Population
plant genetics
organisms
heritability
species diversity
genetic variation
degradation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Whitham, T. G., Gehring, C. A., Evans, L. M., LeRoy, C. J., Bangert, R. K., Schweitzer, J. A., ... Bailey, J. K. (2010). A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology andmanagement. In Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management (pp. 50-73). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777592.004

A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology andmanagement. / Whitham, Thomas G; Gehring, Catherine A; Evans, Luke M.; LeRoy, Carri J.; Bangert, Randy K.; Schweitzer, Jennifer A.; Allan, Gerard J; Barbour, Robert C.; Fischer, Dylan G.; Potts, Bradley M.; Bailey, Joseph K.

Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 50-73.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Whitham, TG, Gehring, CA, Evans, LM, LeRoy, CJ, Bangert, RK, Schweitzer, JA, Allan, GJ, Barbour, RC, Fischer, DG, Potts, BM & Bailey, JK 2010, A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology andmanagement. in Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management. Cambridge University Press, pp. 50-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777592.004
Whitham TG, Gehring CA, Evans LM, LeRoy CJ, Bangert RK, Schweitzer JA et al. A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology andmanagement. In Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 50-73 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777592.004
Whitham, Thomas G ; Gehring, Catherine A ; Evans, Luke M. ; LeRoy, Carri J. ; Bangert, Randy K. ; Schweitzer, Jennifer A. ; Allan, Gerard J ; Barbour, Robert C. ; Fischer, Dylan G. ; Potts, Bradley M. ; Bailey, Joseph K. / A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology andmanagement. Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management. Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 50-73
@inbook{0c45010e416440759b25cd8a7f75a3a3,
title = "A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology andmanagement",
abstract = "The emerging field of community and ecosystem genetics has so far focused on how the genetic variation in one species can influence the composition of associated communities and ecosystem processes such as decomposition (see definitions in Table 3–1; reviews by Whitham et al. 2003, 2006; Johnson&Stinchcombe 2007; Hughes et al. 2008). A key component of this approach has been an emphasis on understanding how the genetics of foundation plant species influence a much larger community. It is reasoned that because foundation species structure their ecosystems by creating locally stable conditions and provide specific resources for diverse organisms (Dayton 1972; Ellison et al. 2005), the genetics of these species as “community drivers” are most important to understand and most likely to have cascading ecological and evolutionary effects throughout an ecosystem (Whitham et al. 2006). For example, when a foundation species’ genotype influences the relative fitness of other species, it constitutes an indirect genetic interaction (Shuster et al. 2006), and when these interactions change species composition and abundance among individual tree genotypes, they result in individual genotypes having distinct community and ecosystem phenotypes. Thus, in addition to an individual genotype having the “traditional” phenotype that population geneticists typically consider as the expression of a trait at the individual and population level, community geneticists must also consider higher-level phenotypes at the community and ecosystem level. The predictability of phenotypes at levels higher than the population can be quantified as community heritability (i.e., the tendency for related individuals to support similar communities of organisms and ecosystem processes; Whitham et al. 2003, 2006; Shuster et al. 2006).",
author = "Whitham, {Thomas G} and Gehring, {Catherine A} and Evans, {Luke M.} and LeRoy, {Carri J.} and Bangert, {Randy K.} and Schweitzer, {Jennifer A.} and Allan, {Gerard J} and Barbour, {Robert C.} and Fischer, {Dylan G.} and Potts, {Bradley M.} and Bailey, {Joseph K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511777592.004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511777592",
pages = "50--73",
booktitle = "Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A community and ecosystem genetics approach to conservation biology andmanagement

AU - Whitham, Thomas G

AU - Gehring, Catherine A

AU - Evans, Luke M.

AU - LeRoy, Carri J.

AU - Bangert, Randy K.

AU - Schweitzer, Jennifer A.

AU - Allan, Gerard J

AU - Barbour, Robert C.

AU - Fischer, Dylan G.

AU - Potts, Bradley M.

AU - Bailey, Joseph K.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The emerging field of community and ecosystem genetics has so far focused on how the genetic variation in one species can influence the composition of associated communities and ecosystem processes such as decomposition (see definitions in Table 3–1; reviews by Whitham et al. 2003, 2006; Johnson&Stinchcombe 2007; Hughes et al. 2008). A key component of this approach has been an emphasis on understanding how the genetics of foundation plant species influence a much larger community. It is reasoned that because foundation species structure their ecosystems by creating locally stable conditions and provide specific resources for diverse organisms (Dayton 1972; Ellison et al. 2005), the genetics of these species as “community drivers” are most important to understand and most likely to have cascading ecological and evolutionary effects throughout an ecosystem (Whitham et al. 2006). For example, when a foundation species’ genotype influences the relative fitness of other species, it constitutes an indirect genetic interaction (Shuster et al. 2006), and when these interactions change species composition and abundance among individual tree genotypes, they result in individual genotypes having distinct community and ecosystem phenotypes. Thus, in addition to an individual genotype having the “traditional” phenotype that population geneticists typically consider as the expression of a trait at the individual and population level, community geneticists must also consider higher-level phenotypes at the community and ecosystem level. The predictability of phenotypes at levels higher than the population can be quantified as community heritability (i.e., the tendency for related individuals to support similar communities of organisms and ecosystem processes; Whitham et al. 2003, 2006; Shuster et al. 2006).

AB - The emerging field of community and ecosystem genetics has so far focused on how the genetic variation in one species can influence the composition of associated communities and ecosystem processes such as decomposition (see definitions in Table 3–1; reviews by Whitham et al. 2003, 2006; Johnson&Stinchcombe 2007; Hughes et al. 2008). A key component of this approach has been an emphasis on understanding how the genetics of foundation plant species influence a much larger community. It is reasoned that because foundation species structure their ecosystems by creating locally stable conditions and provide specific resources for diverse organisms (Dayton 1972; Ellison et al. 2005), the genetics of these species as “community drivers” are most important to understand and most likely to have cascading ecological and evolutionary effects throughout an ecosystem (Whitham et al. 2006). For example, when a foundation species’ genotype influences the relative fitness of other species, it constitutes an indirect genetic interaction (Shuster et al. 2006), and when these interactions change species composition and abundance among individual tree genotypes, they result in individual genotypes having distinct community and ecosystem phenotypes. Thus, in addition to an individual genotype having the “traditional” phenotype that population geneticists typically consider as the expression of a trait at the individual and population level, community geneticists must also consider higher-level phenotypes at the community and ecosystem level. The predictability of phenotypes at levels higher than the population can be quantified as community heritability (i.e., the tendency for related individuals to support similar communities of organisms and ecosystem processes; Whitham et al. 2003, 2006; Shuster et al. 2006).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82955243521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82955243521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511777592.004

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511777592.004

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511777592

SN - 9780521515641

SP - 50

EP - 73

BT - Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -