A Batesonian perspective on qualitative research and complex human systems

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the fundamental assumptions and presuppositions of the complexity sciences in contrast to various paradigms of educational research. This examination focuses on a variety of conflicting assumptions that lead to problems in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and, in fact, to problems in how we see and understand our world, in general. In addition, the chapter explores how such conflicting assumptions and their associated paradigms insidiously work their way into the research on complex systems and dynamics. From this basis, the chapter develops an argument for qualitative research that provides more consistent and in depth approaches to understanding complex systems dynamics in educational settings. This chapter draws on the historical work of Kurt Lewin, Gregory Bateson, L. Andrew Coward, Gerald Weinberg, Ross Ashby, Ruth Benedict, Hannah Arendt, and others, as well as on more recent work in the complexity sciences in education, including the work of Brent Davis, David Sumara, Bill Doll, Jayne Fleener, and many others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationComplex Dynamical Systems in Education
Subtitle of host publicationConcepts, Methods and Applications
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages23-37
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9783319275772
ISBN (Print)9783319275758
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

qualitative research
paradigm
educational setting
science
educational research
examination
interpretation
education

Keywords

  • Abduction
  • Abstraction
  • Bateson
  • Conflicting assumptions
  • Contextualized
  • Multiple description
  • Nonlinearity
  • Paradigmatic cohesiveness
  • Relationships
  • Systems thinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Bloom, J. W. (2016). A Batesonian perspective on qualitative research and complex human systems. In Complex Dynamical Systems in Education: Concepts, Methods and Applications (pp. 23-37). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_3

A Batesonian perspective on qualitative research and complex human systems. / Bloom, Jeffrey W.

Complex Dynamical Systems in Education: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Springer International Publishing, 2016. p. 23-37.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Bloom, JW 2016, A Batesonian perspective on qualitative research and complex human systems. in Complex Dynamical Systems in Education: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Springer International Publishing, pp. 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_3
Bloom JW. A Batesonian perspective on qualitative research and complex human systems. In Complex Dynamical Systems in Education: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Springer International Publishing. 2016. p. 23-37 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_3
Bloom, Jeffrey W. / A Batesonian perspective on qualitative research and complex human systems. Complex Dynamical Systems in Education: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Springer International Publishing, 2016. pp. 23-37
@inbook{fdd8a66f4b6c4acf84875840f26c06f1,
title = "A Batesonian perspective on qualitative research and complex human systems",
abstract = "This chapter examines the fundamental assumptions and presuppositions of the complexity sciences in contrast to various paradigms of educational research. This examination focuses on a variety of conflicting assumptions that lead to problems in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and, in fact, to problems in how we see and understand our world, in general. In addition, the chapter explores how such conflicting assumptions and their associated paradigms insidiously work their way into the research on complex systems and dynamics. From this basis, the chapter develops an argument for qualitative research that provides more consistent and in depth approaches to understanding complex systems dynamics in educational settings. This chapter draws on the historical work of Kurt Lewin, Gregory Bateson, L. Andrew Coward, Gerald Weinberg, Ross Ashby, Ruth Benedict, Hannah Arendt, and others, as well as on more recent work in the complexity sciences in education, including the work of Brent Davis, David Sumara, Bill Doll, Jayne Fleener, and many others.",
keywords = "Abduction, Abstraction, Bateson, Conflicting assumptions, Contextualized, Multiple description, Nonlinearity, Paradigmatic cohesiveness, Relationships, Systems thinking",
author = "Bloom, {Jeffrey W}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_3",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319275758",
pages = "23--37",
booktitle = "Complex Dynamical Systems in Education",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A Batesonian perspective on qualitative research and complex human systems

AU - Bloom, Jeffrey W

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This chapter examines the fundamental assumptions and presuppositions of the complexity sciences in contrast to various paradigms of educational research. This examination focuses on a variety of conflicting assumptions that lead to problems in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and, in fact, to problems in how we see and understand our world, in general. In addition, the chapter explores how such conflicting assumptions and their associated paradigms insidiously work their way into the research on complex systems and dynamics. From this basis, the chapter develops an argument for qualitative research that provides more consistent and in depth approaches to understanding complex systems dynamics in educational settings. This chapter draws on the historical work of Kurt Lewin, Gregory Bateson, L. Andrew Coward, Gerald Weinberg, Ross Ashby, Ruth Benedict, Hannah Arendt, and others, as well as on more recent work in the complexity sciences in education, including the work of Brent Davis, David Sumara, Bill Doll, Jayne Fleener, and many others.

AB - This chapter examines the fundamental assumptions and presuppositions of the complexity sciences in contrast to various paradigms of educational research. This examination focuses on a variety of conflicting assumptions that lead to problems in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and, in fact, to problems in how we see and understand our world, in general. In addition, the chapter explores how such conflicting assumptions and their associated paradigms insidiously work their way into the research on complex systems and dynamics. From this basis, the chapter develops an argument for qualitative research that provides more consistent and in depth approaches to understanding complex systems dynamics in educational settings. This chapter draws on the historical work of Kurt Lewin, Gregory Bateson, L. Andrew Coward, Gerald Weinberg, Ross Ashby, Ruth Benedict, Hannah Arendt, and others, as well as on more recent work in the complexity sciences in education, including the work of Brent Davis, David Sumara, Bill Doll, Jayne Fleener, and many others.

KW - Abduction

KW - Abstraction

KW - Bateson

KW - Conflicting assumptions

KW - Contextualized

KW - Multiple description

KW - Nonlinearity

KW - Paradigmatic cohesiveness

KW - Relationships

KW - Systems thinking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008870569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008870569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_3

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_3

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319275758

SP - 23

EP - 37

BT - Complex Dynamical Systems in Education

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -