108 years of change in spatial pattern following selective harvest of a Pinus ponderosa stand in northern Arizona

Andrew J Sanchez Meador, Margaret M Moore, J. D. Bakker, P. F. Parysow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Questions: How did an initial tree harvest in 1894 influence the spatial and temporal patterns of Pinus ponderosa recruitment? How do these patterns compare to our understanding of P. ponderosa stand dynamics prior to Euro-American settlement? How might spatial pattern information, particularly with respect to patch characteristics, inform current restoration and management practices? Location: A 2.59-ha permanent sample plot in the Fort Valley Experimental Forest, Flagstaff, Arizona. The plot was selectively harvested in 1894 and measured in 1909 and 2002. Methods: We used historical stem-map and ledger data, contemporary data, and dendrochronological techniques to reconstruct stand structure (tree size, age, location) in three scenarios: (1) unharvested (1909), (2) harvested (1909), and (3) contemporary (2002). We used Clark and Evans' R, Ripley's K(t) univariate analysis, and correlogram analysis to assess the spatial pattern in each scenario. We also used Ripley's K12(O bivariate analysis and tree age data to examine spatial and temporal recruitment patterns as observed in the contemporary scenario. Results and Conclusions: The unharvested stand was aggregated at scales up to 28 m. The selective harvest accentuated the spatial patchiness of the stand in 1909 and changed spatial patterns by homogenizing tree size within patches. By 2002, the stand was a single patch dominated by small trees. Postharvest recruitment patterns were not spatially random; Pinus seedlings initially established in natural grass openings and then proceeded to fill-in stump patches created by harvesting. Knowledge of spatial pattern should be explicitly incorporated into restoration activities in these forests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-90
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Vegetation Science
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Pinus ponderosa
experimental forests
tree age
stand structure
stand dynamics
stumps
patch size
patchiness
valleys
Pinus
grasses
management practice
stems
seedlings
harvest
stem
seedling
grass
valley
methodology

Keywords

  • Clark and evans' R
  • Fort Valley Experimental Forest
  • Gap model
  • Moran's I
  • Neyman-scott process
  • Recruitment pattern
  • Residual stand
  • Ripley's K
  • Woolsey permanent plots

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Plant Science

Cite this

108 years of change in spatial pattern following selective harvest of a Pinus ponderosa stand in northern Arizona. / Sanchez Meador, Andrew J; Moore, Margaret M; Bakker, J. D.; Parysow, P. F.

In: Journal of Vegetation Science, Vol. 20, No. 1, 02.2009, p. 79-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{313dd9ed42204a8688a86b922b78e7a6,
title = "108 years of change in spatial pattern following selective harvest of a Pinus ponderosa stand in northern Arizona",
abstract = "Questions: How did an initial tree harvest in 1894 influence the spatial and temporal patterns of Pinus ponderosa recruitment? How do these patterns compare to our understanding of P. ponderosa stand dynamics prior to Euro-American settlement? How might spatial pattern information, particularly with respect to patch characteristics, inform current restoration and management practices? Location: A 2.59-ha permanent sample plot in the Fort Valley Experimental Forest, Flagstaff, Arizona. The plot was selectively harvested in 1894 and measured in 1909 and 2002. Methods: We used historical stem-map and ledger data, contemporary data, and dendrochronological techniques to reconstruct stand structure (tree size, age, location) in three scenarios: (1) unharvested (1909), (2) harvested (1909), and (3) contemporary (2002). We used Clark and Evans' R, Ripley's K(t) univariate analysis, and correlogram analysis to assess the spatial pattern in each scenario. We also used Ripley's K12(O bivariate analysis and tree age data to examine spatial and temporal recruitment patterns as observed in the contemporary scenario. Results and Conclusions: The unharvested stand was aggregated at scales up to 28 m. The selective harvest accentuated the spatial patchiness of the stand in 1909 and changed spatial patterns by homogenizing tree size within patches. By 2002, the stand was a single patch dominated by small trees. Postharvest recruitment patterns were not spatially random; Pinus seedlings initially established in natural grass openings and then proceeded to fill-in stump patches created by harvesting. Knowledge of spatial pattern should be explicitly incorporated into restoration activities in these forests.",
keywords = "Clark and evans' R, Fort Valley Experimental Forest, Gap model, Moran's I, Neyman-scott process, Recruitment pattern, Residual stand, Ripley's K, Woolsey permanent plots",
author = "{Sanchez Meador}, {Andrew J} and Moore, {Margaret M} and Bakker, {J. D.} and Parysow, {P. F.}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05464.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "79--90",
journal = "Journal of Vegetation Science",
issn = "1100-9233",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 108 years of change in spatial pattern following selective harvest of a Pinus ponderosa stand in northern Arizona

AU - Sanchez Meador, Andrew J

AU - Moore, Margaret M

AU - Bakker, J. D.

AU - Parysow, P. F.

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Questions: How did an initial tree harvest in 1894 influence the spatial and temporal patterns of Pinus ponderosa recruitment? How do these patterns compare to our understanding of P. ponderosa stand dynamics prior to Euro-American settlement? How might spatial pattern information, particularly with respect to patch characteristics, inform current restoration and management practices? Location: A 2.59-ha permanent sample plot in the Fort Valley Experimental Forest, Flagstaff, Arizona. The plot was selectively harvested in 1894 and measured in 1909 and 2002. Methods: We used historical stem-map and ledger data, contemporary data, and dendrochronological techniques to reconstruct stand structure (tree size, age, location) in three scenarios: (1) unharvested (1909), (2) harvested (1909), and (3) contemporary (2002). We used Clark and Evans' R, Ripley's K(t) univariate analysis, and correlogram analysis to assess the spatial pattern in each scenario. We also used Ripley's K12(O bivariate analysis and tree age data to examine spatial and temporal recruitment patterns as observed in the contemporary scenario. Results and Conclusions: The unharvested stand was aggregated at scales up to 28 m. The selective harvest accentuated the spatial patchiness of the stand in 1909 and changed spatial patterns by homogenizing tree size within patches. By 2002, the stand was a single patch dominated by small trees. Postharvest recruitment patterns were not spatially random; Pinus seedlings initially established in natural grass openings and then proceeded to fill-in stump patches created by harvesting. Knowledge of spatial pattern should be explicitly incorporated into restoration activities in these forests.

AB - Questions: How did an initial tree harvest in 1894 influence the spatial and temporal patterns of Pinus ponderosa recruitment? How do these patterns compare to our understanding of P. ponderosa stand dynamics prior to Euro-American settlement? How might spatial pattern information, particularly with respect to patch characteristics, inform current restoration and management practices? Location: A 2.59-ha permanent sample plot in the Fort Valley Experimental Forest, Flagstaff, Arizona. The plot was selectively harvested in 1894 and measured in 1909 and 2002. Methods: We used historical stem-map and ledger data, contemporary data, and dendrochronological techniques to reconstruct stand structure (tree size, age, location) in three scenarios: (1) unharvested (1909), (2) harvested (1909), and (3) contemporary (2002). We used Clark and Evans' R, Ripley's K(t) univariate analysis, and correlogram analysis to assess the spatial pattern in each scenario. We also used Ripley's K12(O bivariate analysis and tree age data to examine spatial and temporal recruitment patterns as observed in the contemporary scenario. Results and Conclusions: The unharvested stand was aggregated at scales up to 28 m. The selective harvest accentuated the spatial patchiness of the stand in 1909 and changed spatial patterns by homogenizing tree size within patches. By 2002, the stand was a single patch dominated by small trees. Postharvest recruitment patterns were not spatially random; Pinus seedlings initially established in natural grass openings and then proceeded to fill-in stump patches created by harvesting. Knowledge of spatial pattern should be explicitly incorporated into restoration activities in these forests.

KW - Clark and evans' R

KW - Fort Valley Experimental Forest

KW - Gap model

KW - Moran's I

KW - Neyman-scott process

KW - Recruitment pattern

KW - Residual stand

KW - Ripley's K

KW - Woolsey permanent plots

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249151017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249151017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05464.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05464.x

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 79

EP - 90

JO - Journal of Vegetation Science

JF - Journal of Vegetation Science

SN - 1100-9233

IS - 1

ER -